It is currently May 1st 2025 1:34 pm




  Page Previous  1, 2, 3
Post Posted: March 24th 2005 5:52 pm
 

Join: February 11th 2005 4:46 pm
Posts: 32
Nice job on the PDF mrblack!

Jedi Master Matt wrote:
Do you know if anyone has tried to OCR the scanned pages instead of retyping?

I've got a scanner at work that can do it; but, I don't know if it'll work with these scans.


I've OCRed all of the ones I've done so far.

I have all of the Order 66 chapter in text format. JangoFett2296 said he'd post more soon, but I can post the rest of it if he doesn't have time.


Post Posted: March 24th 2005 6:13 pm
 

Join: January 22nd 2004 11:19 pm
Posts: 211
Twinners wrote:

I've OCRed all of the ones I've done so far.



Good. I thought you were doing it by hand...

This deserves a Ric Olie "You catch on pretty quick". ;)


Post Posted: March 24th 2005 6:44 pm
 
User avatar

Join: February 16th 2005 8:18 pm
Posts: 5
Location: boston,ma
jesus christ :heavymetal:
thanks!


Post Posted: March 24th 2005 6:48 pm
 

Join: March 24th 2005 3:48 pm
Posts: 90
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
thanks for the posts guys..... I really like the Order 66 Chapter... Bail Organa is my favourite character from the PT :heavymetal:


Post Posted: March 24th 2005 6:57 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 8th 2005 1:36 pm
Posts: 49
Hmmm. I am tempted to read this, but somthing tells me that once I do so, I will have crossed a line beyond the point of no return. I have spoiled most of the basic plot points, but having the scenes mapped out in detailed descriptions... it's going to take away from my enjoyment of the film on May 19th I think. Still... very tempting.

I don't mind knowing about most of the scenes, thier setups and what happens etc. But by going through lines from the novel I think I'm going to spoil too much. I want to be able to experience some feeling of surprise when I see ROTS, some feeling of 'Gee, what a cool way to have the scene play out..'

I guess this means I'm signing off now... until the film is out that is. The spoilers will only get more and more revealing from here on in, I think I'm better off out of it. Will probably resume posting once the film has been out for a while. There will be plenty to discuss once that happens.

Peace out!


Post Posted: March 24th 2005 9:42 pm
 
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
User avatar

Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm
Posts: 4265
Twinner now has is own dedicated thread:
http://www.millenniumfalcon.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=3540

Let's keep scans here and transcriptions there. :)
Good Idea?


Post Posted: March 24th 2005 10:22 pm
 

Join: February 11th 2005 4:46 pm
Posts: 32
Good. I thought you were doing it by hand...

Nahhh... I'm dedicated, but not quite that dedicated. ;)

darthpsychotic wrote:
Twinner now has is own dedicated thread:
http://www.millenniumfalcon.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=3540

Let's keep scans here and transcriptions there. :)
Good Idea?


I think so. Thanks DP. :)


Post Posted: March 27th 2005 12:13 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 4th 2004 3:16 am
Posts: 5
If you guys like those excerpts, you really oughta check out Stover's kick ass Mace Windu book.


Post Posted: March 27th 2005 2:26 pm
 

Join: March 26th 2005 2:10 pm
Posts: 14
Location: Oslo, Norway
Man Matt Stover is such a great author!

I have been looking forward to this book since I first heard the news he would be penning it! I loved his other two Star Wars books and hoped he would be picked for the ROTS novelization.

These excerpts prove just how well he did. I am buying the book the day it arrives in my bookstore! :)

PS. Thanks for the scans!


Post Posted: March 27th 2005 5:30 pm
 

Join: November 2nd 2004 12:53 am
Posts: 84
Salacious Crumb wrote:
The story is gripping, emotional and excellently written. I say excellently written because, for all the bashers out there: there is no perfect style of writing.

Good writing is one which adapts to the needs of its audience and also conveys the tone of the story. Its first priority is to communicate clearly. This Stover does remarkably well: it recognises the fast-paced action through broken paragraphs; it also relates, in a similar fashion, the thought processes of all the main characters.

We know it is successful because no-one's confused - everything is made clear. The intentions, motivations, the visual descriptions. Everything.

btw unless your are some listless lawyer making a complex assertion "big paragraphs" do not equate to brain size, nor are they a sign of good writing. In fact they are the sure best bet to confuse an audience.

Thanks again for posting the scans. My confidence is high for RotS.


lol.. good writing is clear writing? Oh, my.. lol. K. So all symbolic or ambiguous novels are bad writing. Mystery novels where you are confused about motivation and the story are bad writing. Finnegan's Wake is really, really bad writing. Hmm.. if there are people out there that dumb and with that little taste, it's no wonder DaVinci Code did as well as it did. Thanks for clearing it up, because the sales of that book were really confusing to me.


Post Posted: March 28th 2005 12:29 am
 
User avatar

Join: April 4th 2004 3:16 am
Posts: 5
Oh and...

Ethril wrote:
I wrote for my highschool and college newspapers, I've written movie reviews for several sources, I've had short stories published various places, and I'm at around the 400 page mark in what I hope will be about a 500 page novel. I suppose none of that proves that I can write, but it proves that some people seem to think so, and it proves I've certainly put some thought and time into the subject. Maybe I'll rewrite a page later.. I don't really feel a need to prove myself, though.. for one thing, no insult intended, but I don't really care what people here think of me.. and for another thing, you and I seem to actually be agreeing.. I admited that the novel was a fun read, I just said it certainly wasn't "well-written".. it's certainly not literature with a capital L by anybody's standards. The main point of my post wasn't to prove my vast knowledge of writing, it was just to defend the person who got all attacked just for daring to say that the prose was disjointed and simpleminded.. which it obviously is..



Ethril, ( hi :) ), if I understand you (a claim I'm hesitating to make) your problem with Stover's storytelling is that it's "disjointed" and "simpleminded." alright, the first sounds like 1 part personal preference and 2 parts cemented mind conditioned with a dash of "rules of thumb" made law, for seasoning. this doesn't go a long way toward supporting your claim, IMNSHO, so, hopefully, you have other points warming the bench.

As for it being "simpleminded," I'm sort of wondering what brand of flowery language were you expecting to find in a Star Wars novelization? Besides, how often do you find prosey prose in a book anymore? the trend for at least four decades now has leaned toward minimalism but I know you know that so no need to get into it.

also curious if your opinion of Stover's style hinges entirely on those excerpts? His non-SW fiction is "Literature with a capital 'L' " and I know plenty of people far more well-read and well-written than either of us who would agree.

Now, just from all of the snippits I've come across here and elsewhere, I'm on the verge of calling this the best novelization put into print. Now, that's not a very tall order and I haven't read all that many novelizations but if I can be convinced otherwise, I'm willing to eat those words.


Post Posted: March 28th 2005 1:27 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 10th 2005 6:55 am
Posts: 158
Location: Los Angeles
My personal take on Stover's style: the man has a gift for metaphor and creative descriptions, but no discipline. He appears to be a bit too in love with his own cleverness, and needs to learn that less is often more.

I'm not particularly novelization-savvy, but in reading the excerpts, I felt quite frequently that a little had gone a long way, and the style had become sugary and distracting. He had me at, "Hello,"... he didn't need to go on for 5 more paragraphs.

But buried within his would-be Hardy-esque sentences appears to be a pretty cool story. I hope he's a young author, so he has time to reign in his abilities and use them less like gimmicks.

_Mike


Post Posted: March 28th 2005 3:07 am
 

Join: November 2nd 2004 12:53 am
Posts: 84
*somnambulating wrote:
Oh and...


Ethril, ( hi :) ), if I understand you (a claim I'm hesitating to make) your problem with Stover's storytelling is that it's "disjointed" and "simpleminded." alright, the first sounds like 1 part personal preference and 2 parts cemented mind conditioned with a dash of "rules of thumb" made law, for seasoning. this doesn't go a long way toward supporting your claim, IMNSHO, so, hopefully, you have other points warming the bench.

As for it being "simpleminded," I'm sort of wondering what brand of flowery language were you expecting to find in a Star Wars novelization? Besides, how often do you find prosey prose in a book anymore? the trend for at least four decades now has leaned toward minimalism but I know you know that so no need to get into it.

also curious if your opinion of Stover's style hinges entirely on those excerpts? His non-SW fiction is "Literature with a capital 'L' " and I know plenty of people far more well-read and well-written than either of us who would agree.

Now, just from all of the snippits I've come across here and elsewhere, I'm on the verge of calling this the best novelization put into print. Now, that's not a very tall order and I haven't read all that many novelizations but if I can be convinced otherwise, I'm willing to eat those words.


How do I really explain why I think a piece of writing is "bad" without going through it point by point? I don't know. Right now it's pretty late and i'm not at all in a debating kind of mood :) His writing reads, basically, as if he took the screenplay in a word document and elaborated on the action descriptions a little bit. His constant paragraph breaks are an excuse for having a rhythm in his actual words, and an ebb and flow to his syntax. There is no cohesion, form does not meld with content. Lots of people keep saying that it's just his style.. Bad word choise, weak command of language, bad flow between dissparate threads of the scenes, and so on. I'm fully aware of what his style is, and I'm not saying that anyone who uses that sort of style is catagorically "bad".. I'm saying that he is doing his chosen style poorly. I think maybe the flaws will be more apparent to people when they try reading a whole book of this stuff, rather than little excerpts.. If all this was intended as was a spoiler report on a website, then it would be great stuff.

Oh, and to the question, "What did I expect from a Star Wars Novelization".. you're right, of course. That's all it is.. nobody expected literature with a capital "L".. honestly, I doubt that would even be possible, as these stories are expressly designed for film, and when Star Wars films truely do achieve sublime moments, it is almost always through a wordless visual sequence or a juxtaposition of words and images. The point was that people are going on about how "well written" this stuff is, and that's just pretty sad. If you enjoy it that's one thing, I wouldn't judge anybody for that and honestly I enjoy it myself. But to think it's anything other than a hack-job just for fun and profit is kinda delusional and makes me sad for the literacy level of the populace.. that's all.


Post Posted: March 29th 2005 8:04 am
 
User avatar

Join: July 28th 2004 3:39 am
Posts: 80
Location: Malmoe, Sweden
Just a quick question on the old continuiety issue regarding Leia's memory of her mother:

We all know now that Padme dies seconds after Leia and Luke are born. We also know that when Luke in ROTJ asks Leia to remember not her mother, but real mother, she says she remembers her as 'sad but kind'.

Are we still to assume that Leia's referring to her surrogate mother? In that case Lukes emphasis on 'real' - in the light of ROTS - seems to suggest three mothers.

I think the Luke-Leia scene would benefit from a manipulation is this respect. But maybe I'm nitpicking.


Post Posted: March 29th 2005 8:58 am
 

Join: January 24th 2004 4:36 am
Posts: 33
Location: Japan
Lightivity wrote:
Are we still to assume that Leia's referring to her surrogate mother? In that case Lukes emphasis on 'real' - in the light of ROTS - seems to suggest three mothers.

I think the Luke-Leia scene would benefit from a manipulation is this respect. But maybe I'm nitpicking.


Actually. I really don't think there's any problem with this. Leia says she only remembers images and feelings. These are things that she could have sensed through the force; a power that she didn't know that she had. All Leia knows is that her mother died when she was young, so she has just taken the feelings and images that she felt and presumes them to be her memories as an infant. You have to look at the whole conversation from the point of view of Leia.

It's pretty weird when you try and think of your own childhood memories. There comes a point when you can't be sure how old you were. I can only go so far back before it's just snatches of vague images, and part of those I'm sure I filled in over time myself.


Post Posted: March 30th 2005 12:47 am
 

Join: February 1st 2005 6:49 pm
Posts: 75
I would imagine that, at least early in her life, she was raised under the impression that the Organas were her real parents. Considering that the whole family interacted closely with the empire, that is probably information that they would not want to get out in the open. So she may be having some kind of false memory, or a memory of someone else. Not that it fucking matters, because it is unlikely that they will explain this. Just another way to look at it.


Post Posted: March 30th 2005 1:21 am
 

Join: July 27th 2004 6:48 pm
Posts: 14
Interesting thing. The executive order FDR signed that allowed the government to round up the Japanese and inter them in camps? Executive Order 9066.


Post Posted: March 30th 2005 1:56 am
 

Join: February 1st 2005 6:49 pm
Posts: 75
That really is interesting. I did not know that.


Post Posted: March 30th 2005 3:24 am
 
User avatar

Join: July 28th 2004 3:39 am
Posts: 80
Location: Malmoe, Sweden
Bespin Sunset & Vinceyoung:

Yeah, my childhood memories are pretty fucked up and manipulated through all the pictures and stories I've been shown and told. But that wouldn't hold up as a movie explanation, I think.

The force theory is cool though. Although in that case it's strange that Luke has no such connections.


Post Posted: March 30th 2005 3:32 am
 

Join: July 24th 2004 6:46 am
Posts: 878
Location: Norway
Quote:
So she may be having some kind of false memory, or a memory of someone else.

Unlikely, since Luke asked about her mother, her real mother. They both seemed to know she was adopted by this point.


Post Posted: March 30th 2005 4:57 am
 

Join: January 24th 2005 12:13 am
Posts: 16
Location: Bangkok, THAILAND
You know, there were Order 66/23 issued by Thai goverment to end the conflict with Thai Communist Party peacefully some 15 years ago. Kashyyyk plates was shoot on locations in Thailand and the name Utapau is also the name of district in south Thailand that once an air force base the US military used during the Vietnam war.


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Page Previous  1, 2, 3



Jump to:  




millenniumfalcon.com©
phpBB©