It is currently May 1st 2025 11:31 am




  Page Previous  1, 2
Post Posted: March 22nd 2005 3:06 pm
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
d-trism wrote:
"First rule in government spending: Why build one when you can build two for twice the price?"

- SR Hadden in "Contact"


That is actually one of the first things I ever posted on this here internet about Star Wars.

Glad to see someone else gets the reference.

:monocle:


Post Posted: March 22nd 2005 3:11 pm
 

Join: July 24th 2004 6:46 am
Posts: 878
Location: Norway
Der Graf wrote:
Nice backpaddling there. Anyway, sorry for my reply being a bit late. I have to live a life from time to time. :)

Ah nice comeback, shithead. If you "have a life", why do you keep arguing about EU or numbers if it´s just fantasy and fiction? Oh, I forget, it´s only serious when you´re stating your case. :whatevaho:

Quote:
Anyway; I've read those "technical commentaries" several times in the last couple of years and it is a good laugh indeed, especially for an ex-student of physics who knows that physics as well as proper sciences don't mean shit in Star Wars realizing that some nerds take their Star Wars so damn seriously... Nevertheless, the 900 km diameter number was indeed mentioned only in relation to the "scale" argument, which doesn't hold any water, and the CINEFEX report and ITW, which I consider to be EU.
There you have it.

So please play nice and don't get your panties in a bunch over trivial things like these. Star Wars is just a fantasy world and personally I only care for exact sciences in the real world out there.

Suspension of Disbelief is what he´s using in the research. Taking realistic numbers and applying them to phenomenon seen in a fictional work.

It´s just a hobby. Now why are you arguing what´s "real" or not in SW, if you don´t care for numbers or SoD?

You´re switching sides and feigning ignorance due to it being "just a fantasy world". Well then, stop posing with false numbers if you don´t care for them either way. It shouldn´t be difficult if it´s just make-believe.


Post Posted: March 22nd 2005 3:43 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 6th 2005 5:16 pm
Posts: 95
Location: Germany
VT-16 wrote:
You´re switching sides and feigning ignorance due to it being "just a fantasy world". Well then, stop posing with false numbers if you don´t care for them either way. It shouldn´t be difficult if it´s just make-believe.


I usually enjoy your posts, so calm down again. And next time, quote me correctly please: living a life "from time to time". That's why I still enjoy message board discussion (from time to time) - as long as it is respectful.

Switching sides? Not really.
I participated in this thread because I don't care for EU and I was quite sure the 160 km scale WAS indeed canon. THAT was the starting point of my argumentation, not hairsplitting about false or correct numbers and fantasy or reality. But after being attacked personally, I had to defend myself, hairsplitting included.

OK, enough message board drama. Back to real life, I'm hungry.


Post Posted: March 22nd 2005 3:58 pm
 

Join: July 24th 2004 6:46 am
Posts: 878
Location: Norway
Quote:
I usually enjoy your posts, so calm down again.

I´m not the one throwing a shit-storm when the EU is mentioned. I certainly don´t love it, but I accept that some people enjoy a certain amount of continuity between it and the movies.

Quote:
I participated in this thread because I don't care for EU and I was quite sure the 160 km scale WAS indeed canon.

It is EU, and was never intended by the production crew. An early quote from them said the DS II was over five time larger than the DS I, though this was just an estimate early in the production. (At least I think it was.)

Quote:
But after being attacked personally, I had to defend myself, hairsplitting included.

When you mix the statements "Elaborate on that. 9 times bigger it is not. 120 km compared to 160 kilometers in diameter. " and "EU isn non-existent for me, so no prototype for me either. :)" you come across as a hypocrite. Hell, most of the vehicle-names and character-races are EU only, never mentioned in the movies or by the production crew. Some nutjobs won´t even accept the AT-AT´s name just because we didn´t hear it in the movie.

But fine, I´ve stated my position, the Saxton-link and ITW:OT book are there for anyone interested, and there is no problem with the depiction in the film itself. (Nor was there ever any problem with it from me. I´m sorry if it appeared that way.) :)


Post Posted: March 22nd 2005 4:15 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 6th 2005 5:16 pm
Posts: 95
Location: Germany
VT-16 wrote:
(Nor was there ever any problem with it from me. I´m sorry if it appeared that way.) :)


[typing while eating] No, it didn't. I guess our argument was just a typical escalating message board misunderstanding. Hatchet buried. :) [/typing while eating]


Post Posted: March 22nd 2005 4:27 pm
 

Join: July 24th 2004 6:46 am
Posts: 878
Location: Norway
SidiousTheDon wrote:
what up everyone this is my first post....got banned by that ******* goon bobthegoon....am i allowed to curse here?

anyway, just one question which has probably been disccussed already, but why does it take 20 some years to finish the first Death Star, when the Death Star II is ready in like 3 or 4? Was the Empire already working on the second one prior to a New Hope?

I'm sure it would take longer for the second one because they lost a good deal of henchman and cronies with the loss of DSI.

so what's the deal?

My eye is starting to twitch like the guy in CW 22.


READ. THE. THREAD. nub.


Post Posted: March 22nd 2005 4:34 pm
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
SidiousTheDon wrote:
..but why does it take 20 some years to finish the first Death Star, when the Death Star II is ready in like 3 or 4?


Already answered on page 1 of this thread. In my own brilliant posts, I might add...

:monocle:


Post Posted: March 22nd 2005 5:11 pm
 
Site Admin • Ternian@hotmail.com
User avatar

Join: October 31st 2003 7:00 am
Posts: 1452
I think it is easy to explain.


During the civil war that follows episode III, there will be attacks on supply routes and ships, war will escalate on planets that supply material, the Emperor has to build up his workforce.

Seems all reasonable to me, expecially considering the Trade Federation had an army to protect supply routes once upon a time... ;)


Post Posted: March 22nd 2005 5:40 pm
 
User avatar

Join: July 31st 2004 10:51 am
Posts: 54
God, I love recycling old topics...

http://www.millenniumfalcon.com/phpbb/v ... highlight=

As for my 0.02, as I stated back in December when news of seeing the DS first leaked:

Quote:
Like Vanda, I initially thought it would be a bad idea seeing the DS, as it would pose a large discrepancy between construction times for the DS and DS2. However, others have made the point that in ROTJ, the DS2 is not yet complete... visual observation would seem to indicate it is only about 60% complete. Since ROTJ takes place 4 years after ANH, this would mean the DS2, from start to completion, would probably have taken 7 years (assuming an average completion rate of 15% per year).

That being said, I don't think it's altogether implausible that construction time for the DS2 could be reduced to slightly less than half the time it took to construct the first DS. The main reasons for this are:

1) there is a 19 year gap for technology to improve

2) Palpatine undoubtedly has more resources upon which to draw while constructing the DS2 (with the Empire being as powerful as it is at this point)

3) Palpatine no longer has to keep it secret and can therefore divert as many resources as possible to expedite the construction process (the scroll in ANH does say the plans were "secret", therefore leading me to believe that construction of the DS was being done quietly with neither the Senate nor the galaxy at large being aware of it. This being the case, Palpatine could not dump countless sums of money into the project for fear it would be discovered. Rather it is more likely he quietly channelled funds into the project in such a way as to not draw the attention of outside parties).

4) Having built the original DS would have provided the engineers a template from which to construct the DS2 more quickly (i.e., the DS2 wasn't being constructed "blindly" as was the case with the first DS).


Also, just to clarify something: the DSII was built AFTER the DSI was destroyed in ANH, not simultaneously. Evidence of this is seen in the opening crawl from ROTJ:

"Little does Luke know that the Galactic Empire has secretly BEGUN construction on a new armored space station even more powerful than the first dreaded Death Star."

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to sit in quiet meditation and contemplate my own nerdiness for becoming involved in this discussion.


EDIT: And for those of you discussing dimensions of the DSI and DSII:

http://www.st-v-sw.net/STSWdeathstarsizes.html#DS1


Post Posted: March 22nd 2005 5:58 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 8th 2005 1:36 pm
Posts: 49
LMAO

Seeing people get this worked up about the physical properties of the DS and the varying timescales involved in the construction of moon-sized battle stations is hilarious.

It's going to be a cool moment it the film... so shut up and like it already!


Post Posted: March 22nd 2005 7:02 pm
 

Join: July 24th 2004 6:46 am
Posts: 878
Location: Norway
Tellon wrote:
LMAO

Seeing people get this worked up about the physical properties of the DS and the varying timescales involved in the construction of moon-sized battle stations is hilarious.

It's going to be a cool moment it the film... so shut up and like it already!
yes, "mother".


Post Posted: March 22nd 2005 7:52 pm
 

Join: October 6th 2004 6:01 pm
Posts: 233
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
It's going to be a cool moment it the film... so shut up and like it already!


well said. Thats all i really care about...a cool momment to tie everything together. Nothing more and nothing less...


Post Posted: March 22nd 2005 10:56 pm
 

Join: November 2nd 2004 12:53 am
Posts: 84
This is some pathetic-ass shit. Who knows why it took that long? Who knows why it took them years to find the rebels on Hoth? Who knows why it took as long as it did for them to infiltrate Jabba's Palace and rescure Han? Who knows? And better question: who cares? Completely worthless argument. And the fact that the idiot argument has deteriorated to the point that phrases like, "Nice backpeddling there," and "Good comeback!" have actually entered it is just an embarrasment to all of fandom. Have a little damn respect for yourselves, kids.


Post Posted: March 23rd 2005 4:02 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 9th 2005 2:18 pm
Posts: 78
every discussion has it's "this is a rediculous discussion, shut up, get over it" guy. this one just happens to have like 7! if you dont like this discussion, dont read it. leave us alone cause we really dont care if you think its nerdy to discuss plot intricacies. we're on a goddamn star wars forum

And ethril, to answer your question of who cares? i dont know, but personally, i dont care to hear you calling everyone pathetic. have some respect. yah personally i think it will be a cool scene too, and i dont think it presents any continuity problems...

but if i thought it did, this would be the best goddamn place to say something about it!


Post Posted: March 23rd 2005 5:19 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 11th 2005 2:49 am
Posts: 26
Agreed. If people want to discuss it, let them. Try spending a few days on TF.N...


Post Posted: March 23rd 2005 7:04 am
 

Join: July 24th 2004 6:46 am
Posts: 878
Location: Norway
Ethril wrote:
And better question: who cares? Completely worthless argument.

Some fans care and some will discuss it. Back out of the thread if you don´t like it.

I also fail to see why people not involved in the discussion are suddenly coming out of the woodwork long after it ended. It is over. You can shut up now and go back to the regular fawning over spoilers.

Quote:
Have a little damn respect for yourselves, kids.

This is a fansite, we were having a fan-discussion. If you want to avoid that and "switch your brain off" to enjoy the subject, you can :gb2tfn:


EDIT: To clarify, I think the scene is perfect and have no problem with it. But there are some who will, and brushing it off as "I don´t like EU/It doesn´t count" is just an insult to those who do care, and spend their money/time on it.


Post Posted: March 23rd 2005 7:53 am
 
User avatar

Join: July 29th 2004 2:47 pm
Posts: 84
Location: London, UK
but EU doesnt count....:?


Post Posted: March 23rd 2005 7:58 am
 

Join: July 24th 2004 6:46 am
Posts: 878
Location: Norway
Mint Imperial wrote:
but EU doesnt count....:?

:mad:

;)


Post Posted: March 24th 2005 2:16 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 24th 2005 12:17 am
Posts: 259
But i think thats half the fun... overanalyzing something that there is no way we could ever prove just to talk about one of our favorite things...

its like theyve said before, if you dont like it, dont read it... and even though i dont understand alot of the science thats being mentioned, i like arguing about these things either way. dont take the fun out of it just cause you dont care...


Post Posted: March 24th 2005 2:53 am
 

Join: February 1st 2005 6:49 pm
Posts: 75
You'd think they'd build the death star from the inside-out. At least the structure itself


Post Posted: March 24th 2005 3:16 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 9th 2005 2:18 pm
Posts: 78
i assumed the emperor had told them to rush the giant laser part, so they probably got to that in a rush and ignored certain parts that werent really necessary.


Post Posted: March 24th 2005 3:19 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 9th 2005 2:18 pm
Posts: 78
and once again, can we please keep the thread clear of people who want to point out that we are arguing about something that doesnt matter. we know it doesnt matter, its a movie, but its our hobby and we come here to talk about it. we're not trying to tear the movie apart, we're having a friendly conversation about our theories.


Post Posted: March 24th 2005 5:43 am
 

Join: July 24th 2004 6:46 am
Posts: 878
Location: Norway
joe_h wrote:
Then when Lucas tries to give them an explanation, they whine about how they didn't need an explanation.

I´ve gotten several good explanations already, and still fail to see why people who were never involved in the discussion to begin with, are harping on about it two days after it ended peacefully.

Quote:
First of all, can you tell me how long it should take to build a Death Star in a fantasy world?

We only have other sources besides the films themselves to judge that in writing. You seem to think these kinds of discussions only use arguments made up by the fans, but that isn´t so. Other works from the same fictional universe are used if they contain any additional knowledge on the subject.

Once again, if you don´t like that kind of discussion, then stay out of it.

Quote:
As for how long it took the second Death Star to be built, when and where did the films ever say it took only 3-4 years to build.

In the opening crawl to ROTJ, they state the Empire has begun to build another. The wording makes it sound as if this happened after the first was destroyed.

And since the official timeline states that ROTJ happened 4 years after ANH, then that is the most probable timeframe for it´s construction. Now, we could suppose that immidiately after the first was made and proven successfull, the second began production, but that still wouldn´t give more than a few extra days or weeks.

I like the "keeping the Senate in the dark/extensively test the first" as a good explanation for the extended timeframe.

Quote:
Besides, it's obvious that the second Death Star is not finished. Take on look at the picture. It's obviously in mid-construction.

Yes, thank you, I have seen the movie enough times to know it isn´t finished.

Quote:
You'd think they'd build the death star from the inside-out. At least the structure itself

I thought they did?


Post Posted: March 24th 2005 6:44 am
 
User avatar

Join: July 29th 2004 2:47 pm
Posts: 84
Location: London, UK
Of course what I dont think has been mentioned is the fact that there should never have been 2 death stars. George originally planned a trilogy with the death star being destroyed at the end..

Now (and i know its not how it panned out) imagine that the death star we see being built in ROTS was not destroyed until ROTJ. Seems more plausible like that. That way it takes some 25-30 years(is that right) to build.

Again i know this isnt whats in the movies and ill probably get shot down in flames,but remember GL only put the DS in ANH because he didnt know if he would make the sequels.

Maybe he thought it better to leave it as he had originally planned?


Post Posted: March 24th 2005 6:53 am
 

Join: July 24th 2004 6:46 am
Posts: 878
Location: Norway
Using "What could have been/what was originally planned" as evidence for something now, is a bit ludicrous, I´m sorry to say. It´s a nice theory, but since the story changed, I don´t see any validity in it. It even contradicts the ROTJ opening scroll, which says the Empire had begun constructing another, more powerful Battle Station.

The text basically implies this other station as being second to the first, not being constructed over a lenghty period of time, while at the same time the first is constucted and completed.

EDIT: You could (perhaps) make the case that the skeleton and core of the second was under construction for some years before ANH (since it would be much bigger and need more attention to it), and after the first blew up, they kept a closer eye on it´s final construction, ironing out the faults.

EDITEDIT: Just thought of something, since we see these construction droids working on the DS, with the advanced state of CG, will similar droids be inserted into scenes in ROTJ as well? Just a thought.


Post Posted: March 24th 2005 7:03 am
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
I mentioned this yesterday in one of my posts, but I'll bring it up again:

The 1st Death Star could well have been completed (that is, the entire facility, hangars, hallways, offices, control rooms, trash compactors, etc...) for quite some time before we first see it in ANH.
It's just that the super laser hasn't been tested yet.

Not a major point, but something to think about anyway...


Post Posted: March 24th 2005 7:10 am
 

Join: July 24th 2004 6:46 am
Posts: 878
Location: Norway
The Superlaser would be the most sensitive component (and the reactor, since it is connected to it). So, yeah, extensive testing and securing would be in order. :)


Post Posted: March 24th 2005 10:17 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 15th 2005 6:59 pm
Posts: 12
Due to apparent lack of a real life...

I calculated the volume of a sphere based on the 120 & 160 KM diameters using V=4/3*pi*radius cubed. Barring any (likely) arithmetic errors, the volume of DS 1 is 904,320 cu. KM. DS 2 is 2,143,573 cu. KM. These are figures mentioned earlier in the thread. I have no idea in the EU where they came from but they piqued my curiosity & I thought I'd see if it was actually six times larger since that radius cubed can really have a big impact. I also just figured the 900 KM figure and got 381,510 cu KM. This figure would make DS 2 5.62 times larger than the original, close enough to six for any politician. God, I need a life...


Post Posted: March 24th 2005 4:27 pm
 

Join: August 3rd 2004 2:56 pm
Posts: 88
:lol:

I enjoy anyone with your kind of commitment to geekdom. :)


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Page Previous  1, 2



Jump to:  




millenniumfalcon.com©
phpBB©