So let's say that Star Wars is a car, a car built in '77. Using your point of view as method, then restoring this car should only go as far as putting it to it's original specs. If there were any design flaws, or any current mechanical problems, they should be left as such if they conflict with restoring the car to it's '77 specs. Even though there is technology available that will correct flaws in the design or build of the car, or improve it's performance in any way, these should not be implemented because they conflict with the method.
Now imagine the car is YOUR car. Not only is it your car, but you built the car! In '77, there were a lot of peopel who saw this car and thought it was the most brilliant thing they had ever seen. You, on the other hand, look at the car and, for all your love for it, see only it's flaws. The car has sat in a garage for years; gather dust, corrosion, and slowly breaking down over time. Suddenly, there is a new technology, technology that YOU helped develop and establish, that will not only allow you to make your car run again, you can make it better! you can fix the things you made due with way back when, and actually (in your mind) improve upon it's performance or aesthetics. When you announce this, many of the people who fell in love with your car in '77 step foreward and call you a jackass, schmuck, mother fucker, revisionist, greedy tyrant, cock wrangler, ego stroker, etc.... for even daring mess with it, simply because they don't agree with the decisions you are making, or because it may conflict with the memories they have romanticised about for twenty some years. What do you do? Do you cowtow to the masses simply to appease the herd? Or do you go ahead with what will make you happy to do?
|