I originally posted this earlier, but for some reason it never appeared. I've consumed a lot more alcohol since then, so bear with me
For me the original trilogy, and indeed the saga as a whole, can be interpreted as the redemption of Anakin Skywalker. This is the primary reason why I believe Shaw should have remained at the end of Jedi. By killing Palpatine and saving his son, Anakin renounced the dark side of the Force and was redeemed. It makes perfect sense for him to appear as an old man (even though he was only in his forties if you do the math) at the end of the film. Not only has the change to Hayden undermined this, but it's a terrible effort. The kid is not a particularly good actor, and his appearance doesn't gel with the others. Hell, in one shot he looks like a damn kiddie fiddler.
Now I've read the opinions of people who say it makes no sense for him to appear as a ghost because he's pretty much just a torso, but I have to ask, is Hayden's right arm mechanical in the new footage? For that argument to work, it would have to be.
At the end of the day I appreciate that these are Lucas' films, but just because he can do something, it doesn't mean he should. Adding completely redundant scenes like Jabba in Star Wars, or having Greedo shoot first to 'water down' Han's character really hurt the films (and there are plenty of other examples of things that should have just been left alone). No doubt this will open me up to vitriolic attacks from the people on here who profess to be ‘true’ fans of the trilogy (whatever that means), but these films are art, and as such they are open to criticism.
Come this October I will be twenty nine years of age, and Star Wars has been a huge part of my life since childhood (even during the years when, according to some members of this forum, no one was interested). While I welcome Lucas’ revised cuts of the film, I find his unwillingness to offer the original versions is disrespectful to those fans that have supported him over the years. I, for one, have respect for Spielberg, who offered people two versions of E.T. when it arrived on DVD. I’ve watched both versions of the film, and the original release remains the superior cut after more than twenty years. I’m not disrespecting those who prefer the added CGI E.T., the ‘hippy’ dialogue and walkie talkies, but at least they’ve made their choice after seeing both versions.
I’m sure the debate will rage on, unfortunately resulting in much name calling and sniping, but in spite of all the changes I am genuinely looking forward to this set. Sure there are problems. But the good far outweighs the bad when considering the job Lowrey has done with the transfers (my bootlegs of the original and SE releases are fairly poor). It appears that some members of the forum are intolerant of others’ views, whatever they may be, but that’s human nature. Hopefully this will change as more and more people get their hands on the set and experience the release for themselves. Personally I’m hoping DVDSoon get their stock and ship, well, soon, because I know of at least two other R1 retailers who have delivered sets to the UK already…