It is currently May 1st 2025 11:01 am




  Page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Post Posted: July 27th 2004 3:18 pm
 
User avatar

Join: July 27th 2004 11:36 am
Posts: 7
Location: Landos Upper Lip
The change was made because Shaw being the force ghost made no sense since day one but no one really ever noticed.

Vader is essentially a head and partial torso with everything else being robotic right? So why the hell is he standing there with his entire body intact?

Im sure Obi would be like "Hey! How the hell did you get that arm back? I cut that off when I kicked your ass years ago"

Putting Hayden in is a good call. I like it.

LM


Post Posted: July 27th 2004 3:21 pm
 

Join: April 24th 1981 6:59 pm
Posts: 531
Location: San Diego
Could you imagine force ghost torso Anakin?


Post Posted: July 27th 2004 7:46 pm
 
User avatar

Join: June 20th 2004 7:19 pm
Posts: 330
Agreed. It makes the saga's story arc stronger :heavymetal:


Post Posted: July 27th 2004 8:25 pm
 
Co-host of SWD • hillaripus

Join: May 25th 1977 7:30 am
Posts: 1000
During the audio commentary on the DVD, Lucas is talking. I guess you can get the explanation there.


Post Posted: July 27th 2004 9:17 pm
 

Join: July 26th 2004 5:11 pm
Posts: 12
If some of the changes like Anakin Ghost, or Emperor during ESB look bad, it the fans fault? Lucas said he wanted to wait until after EP3 to work on the DVD. But demand was so great they released them early. If fans could have waited until 2006 or so, Lucas would have time to work long on some of the changes. So it our fault? Was all this rushed?
Making EP3 and redoing parts of the OT had to cost a lot of work and time.


Post Posted: July 27th 2004 9:32 pm
 

Join: July 25th 2004 10:47 pm
Posts: 401
Making what will be easily be one of the fastest selling DVDs ever made can buy you more than a few computer animators.


Post Posted: July 27th 2004 10:17 pm
 
User avatar

Join: July 27th 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 9
AAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!

I've downloaded the codexes from about ten different place but it still won't work on my media player. I've even downloaded the thing on the first page for windows but it still don't work. It keeps on saying Class not registered. and when downloading it has Codex problems. do you why I can't download it.


Post Posted: July 27th 2004 10:26 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 31st 2003 7:00 am
Posts: 234
SpawnofSidious wrote:
AAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!

I've downloaded the codexes from about ten different place but it still won't work on my media player. I've even downloaded the thing on the first page for windows but it still don't work. It keeps on saying Class not registered. and when downloading it has Codex problems. do you why I can't download it.


Codec, and this place isn't tech support. Download the XVid codec and it will work


Post Posted: July 27th 2004 10:40 pm
 
User avatar

Join: July 27th 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 9
I already have...


Post Posted: July 27th 2004 10:55 pm
 

Join: July 25th 2004 10:47 pm
Posts: 401
Try downloading VLC, it's a media player with codecs built in.

Trust me on this one.


Post Posted: July 27th 2004 11:42 pm
 
User avatar

Join: January 29th 2004 7:10 pm
Posts: 425
Gordian.Knot.Codec.Pack.1.7.Setup.exe?download


Post Posted: July 27th 2004 11:51 pm
 
User avatar

Join: January 28th 2004 10:31 pm
Posts: 131
Mirror up


Post Posted: July 28th 2004 12:45 am
 
User avatar

Join: May 19th 2004 1:42 am
Posts: 65
AgentCross wrote:
That video looks fake. It looks like they used footage of Anakin standing in Padme's apartment in Ep.3. Then they shrunk Shaw's body and put Hayden's head on it. Which is why his chin goes inside his chest towards the end. It also explains why Hadyen looks goofy....the Hayden footage is between takes so he isnt acting.

http://img52.exs.cx/img52/6849/anakin.jpg



Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Posts: 1


Post Posted: July 29th 2004 5:42 am
 

Join: July 28th 2004 5:22 pm
Posts: 4
I can't believe they made it this bad.

How come they couldn't even keep the the nice look between Anakin and OB1. All the emotion is simply gone.


Post Posted: July 29th 2004 6:13 am
 

Join: July 24th 2004 6:46 am
Posts: 878
Location: Norway
Quote:
The emotion has NOT gone... Indeed, it's there for the first time

Hayden Christensen and emotion, together at last! :cool:


Post Posted: July 29th 2004 6:16 am
 

Join: July 28th 2004 5:22 pm
Posts: 4
I'm sorry my friend but I do not agree. The emotion in this scene is in the fact that, after so many years of Chaos, Anakin and Ob1 find each other again. The look of pure tenderness between Shaw and Guiness was about that : Friendship. Now it looks like Anakin and OB1 try to avoid each other. When the first one is looking, the other is not, and vice versa.

For me it s a real shame.


Post Posted: July 29th 2004 6:22 am
 

Join: April 28th 2004 8:45 am
Posts: 299
Yeah, they should have french-kissed.

:mrgreen:

-Jason


Post Posted: July 29th 2004 6:27 am
 

Join: July 24th 2004 6:46 am
Posts: 878
Location: Norway
Obi-WanXAnakin erotic fanfics! :meatwad:


Post Posted: July 29th 2004 11:00 am
 

Join: July 27th 2004 2:46 pm
Posts: 11
So the vintage Anakin Skywalker 3 3/4" figure, the Darth Vader masterpiece edition with the 12" old Anakin Skywalker in Jedi robes figure (also Sebastian Shaw version) and POFT2 cinema ghost scene of Anakin, Ben, and Yoda - they're all just wrong now!

http://cargobay.starwars.com/webapps/ca ... /5291/9153

http://www.rebelscum.com/photo.asp?imag ... ritbox.jpg

I guess toy collectors should demand a refund, cause they're just all wrong now and get a stupid Hayden Christensen ghost version replacement!!


Post Posted: July 29th 2004 6:00 pm
 
User avatar

Join: January 29th 2004 7:10 pm
Posts: 425
My comparison footage is back up.

http://aptirrelevance.com/gupta/anakinghost.avi


Post Posted: July 29th 2004 6:18 pm
 
User avatar

Join: July 25th 2004 11:01 pm
Posts: 83
lol..

Ok, i guess i need to call up and get my refund for the cantina figures that where deleted in the SE.


Post Posted: July 30th 2004 6:53 pm
 

Join: July 30th 2004 6:48 pm
Posts: 2
This video hopefully isn't real. Because it sucks. What's up with the sinister stare at the camera. Plus Hayden's coloring is slightly lighter than Yoda and Ben's.

Nice try George.


Post Posted: July 30th 2004 6:56 pm
 
User avatar

Join: January 23rd 2004 3:13 pm
Posts: 592
Location: Finland
Greeneyes wrote:
This video hopefully isn't real.


I'm just wondering how many of these JCers will think that there was some evil conspiracy that faked all the DVDs in the stores? :mrgreen:


Post Posted: July 30th 2004 7:31 pm
 
User avatar

Join: July 30th 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 138
Location: Coastal North Carolina
To tell you the truth, I never really felt that Shaw really made me think he WAS Anakin, I just never felt any connection to him. I respect him and all but...well you know what I mean.


Post Posted: July 31st 2004 6:31 am
 
User avatar

Join: February 11th 2004 10:51 am
Posts: 111
Location: o.paa@quicknet.ch
littlegreenman wrote:

So, if it's okay to delete actors out of movies and replace them with other actors...then why not switch Jack Nicholson as the Joker in Batman with Nicholas Cage??


WTF??? I mean man...what the fuck?!


Post Posted: August 1st 2004 2:52 am
 

Join: July 24th 2004 6:46 am
Posts: 878
Location: Norway
Quote:
So, if it's okay to delete actors out of movies and replace them with other actors...then why not switch Jack Nicholson as the Joker in Batman with Nicholas Cage??

Stop making retarded comparisons, this is just a small scene, not an entire movie, asshat! :what:


Post Posted: August 1st 2004 2:57 am
 
User avatar

Join: February 5th 2004 12:21 am
Posts: 18
But he raises a good point, personnally I wouldn't mind if they replaced the whole movie, ya' know with a better one, without gay Prince songs, without a director that had never read a single fucking Batman comic before making the movie...they could call it BATMAN BEGINS. ;)


Post Posted: August 1st 2004 2:17 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 1st 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 20
I'll probably get linched for this but I think the HC/SS scene change is just logical continuity.

I love it !


Post Posted: August 6th 2004 8:27 am
 
User avatar

Join: August 1st 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 20
Banelord wrote:
this is too weird...

my problems with adding Hayden Anakin into ROTJ? why just him, and not the Ewan OB1? why leave the Shaw Vader unmasked scene?
why does Anakin look like he just walked off the set of a Clockwork Orange? (Alex Skywalker, anyone?)

This also leads back to one of the biggest faults of the PT... Anakins "special" black garb. As a Star Wars purist, even i can admit Anakin looks cool in the black outfit, and that he looks fantastic in the blockade runner pics from EIII, but i would anyday prefer that Anakin wore the traditional Jedi garb until he was booted from the order at least. i think the contrast of him as a Jedi, then as the Dark Lord would be more striking this way.

oh well, though, too fucking late. btw, he does look pasted onto Shaw, now that it has been mentioned. Another thing, why the hell is Luca$, who has been pushing digital cinema, digital effects, ect. ect., then turning around and releasing such half-assed DVD collections?

First Indy Jones, now Star Wars? no way i am buying this, ALIEN QUADRILOGY is still owning this!


Why not Ewan McGregor as Obi-wan in the New ROTJ? Luke Skywalker met Obi-wan in his elderly years and would not recognise a young looking (Ewan McGregor) Obi-wan.

Why Keep Sebastian Shaw in the mask scene in ROTJ ? Well ROTJ is set twenty something years after Episode III so naturally he has aged, it would make no sense having Hayden Christensen in that scene.

I think Lucas has got this one spot on.


Post Posted: August 27th 2004 3:52 pm
 

Join: August 27th 2004 3:46 pm
Posts: 5
For all of the Hyperspace Subsrcibers out there, you may see that in one of the Hyperspace videos, you can notice that Hayden is doing the exact same thing when he is getting his hair cut "70's", (forget which video), and also...in the other appearances it is not Hayden. I magnified the video and compared the bone structure to a Hayden at the same resolution. And also, half way through the comparison video, Anakin changes suddenly, from one position to another, and Shaw's movement is fluid. At first I thought that the comparison cut out the scene with Leia and Luke, which is a valid explanation why he changed suddelny, before I watched Shaw and Yoda and Guiness, they were all fluid...so...and...he also CHANGES in height. SEE FOR YOURSELF! It is not Hayden. And also...it has already been confirmed that this is a hoax...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anakin_Skywalker

-------------------------------------------
This proved to be an internet hoax generated by fans already upset with his apparent decision to never again to release the Trilogy in its original form. Professional digital artists were able to easilly spot that Christensen's head had been rather amateurishly "photoshopped" onto Shaw's body.
-------------------------------------------

Sorry to dissapoint, but George Lucas would not INTENTIONALLY disgrace the memory of Sebastian Shaw.

Thank you :heavymetal:


Post Posted: August 27th 2004 4:17 pm
 

Join: April 24th 1981 6:59 pm
Posts: 531
Location: San Diego
:lol:

Wow.

:lol:

Congrats, you have just won the lifetime clueless fan award!! :meatwad:


Post Posted: August 27th 2004 4:36 pm
 

Join: August 27th 2004 3:46 pm
Posts: 5
Can you explain how Hayden suddenly shrunk in size? Watch the comparison, if you havent already. Also...explain how Hayden looks different the first shot BEFORE leia and luke, and the shot after that...he doesnt look at all like Hayden.


EDIT: And have you SEEN the dvds? If you have, this isnt possible, because they havent been released yet. I know that the sources for your dvd rips and whatnots (lol) is pretty reliable, but seeing as how Anakin was ALIVE when Luke took off his helmet, looking all human, he shouldve died and still looked like Shaw.

If GL did change it...I have no respect.


Post Posted: August 27th 2004 4:42 pm
 

Join: April 24th 1981 6:59 pm
Posts: 531
Location: San Diego
What comparison video are you talking about? In one of those videos a reaction shot is cut out so it looks like it jumps. I have the final version and it looks just fine.

Edit: BTW, the DVD rips are real and I have them. Sorry buddy. Guess you have no respect.


Post Posted: August 27th 2004 4:47 pm
 

Join: August 27th 2004 3:46 pm
Posts: 5
http://aptirrelevance.com/gupta/anakinghost.avi

Also...if you notice that between scenes (Before and After Luke and Leia) his appearance changes...And to me, it doesnt look real...because I have seen the Ending, and Hayden looks like it was filmed poorly...


Post Posted: August 27th 2004 4:49 pm
 

Join: April 24th 1981 6:59 pm
Posts: 531
Location: San Diego
Yeah that size change is because a Luke/Leia reaction shot was cut out.


Post Posted: August 27th 2004 4:55 pm
 

Join: April 24th 1981 6:59 pm
Posts: 531
Location: San Diego
Sucks to be you. I, however, get to enjoy these changes.


Post Posted: August 27th 2004 4:57 pm
 

Join: August 27th 2004 3:46 pm
Posts: 5
If you watch, the distance of the camera never moves between the shot b4 and after L&L, so it cannot be a scene change that brings Hayden down about 2 cms.

If you watch the ending of the DVD version, that is...sorry.


Post Posted: August 27th 2004 5:09 pm
 

Join: April 24th 1981 6:59 pm
Posts: 531
Location: San Diego
I see what you're saying about the comparison video, but its not noticeable at all in the real ending. It could be as simple as a step back or a bend in the knees.

Regardless, the change has happened and this is the final version.


Post Posted: August 27th 2004 7:44 pm
 
User avatar

Join: July 30th 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 138
Location: Coastal North Carolina
I totally agree with DKR, its like watching the end of ROTK, you have to watch it in context.

BTW, your quote is from Twin Engines of Destruction comic right?





DarthFirst already confirmed that Lucas said nothing about the change in the commentary, and why can you not post it here if you have it?


Post Posted: August 27th 2004 9:22 pm
 

Join: August 27th 2004 3:46 pm
Posts: 5
I agree with The Sessler.

And also...

If you see the SE or the OT, you may notice that Vader (Anakin) at the end is good, and was back to the light side, as heard in his tone of voice, and he actually showed compassion to Luke, so I am inclined to believe that that WAS his true identity, and was not physically altered by the dark side, someone cannot simply change back to the way they looked BEFORE they get thrown into a volcano and embrace the dark side when they die... If that was the case, and they could change their appearance, then Im sure Yoda would want to look like he had a full head of hair. Lol. That said, I find it very...unrealistic...which is an oxymoron...because Star Wars isnt realistic. Lol...ranting. :roll:


Post Posted: August 28th 2004 12:46 am
 

Join: August 24th 2004 11:37 pm
Posts: 180
Well we're talking about ghosts here. What dictates what ghost looks like? Who's to say that the ghosts don't get to choose their appearance, since a spirit is just a spirit anyway and has no physical form. Really, if it was about staying the way he looked when he died, wouldn't Anakin just look like a few pounds of meat with a smashed up head? You can say he chose to look the way he did before the dark side took him over.

Oh, and it's just a movie, despite my level of seriousness about it.


Post Posted: August 28th 2004 8:40 am
 
User avatar

Join: July 30th 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 138
Location: Coastal North Carolina
Not that it needed to be proved again(I think we are only about 99.99 percent sure) but just how does that clip prove it? Lucas or Burtt say nothing about it.


Post Posted: August 28th 2004 9:55 am
 
User avatar

Join: July 30th 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 138
Location: Coastal North Carolina
I suppose you're right.


Post Posted: August 29th 2004 12:43 am
 
User avatar

Join: August 26th 2004 6:38 am
Posts: 85
I don't think it looks bad at all, the only thing that's kind of strange is when Hayden looks down like "what the fuck am I wearing" but other than that I kind of like it.

I don't think the ending is ruined at all.


Post Posted: August 29th 2004 1:51 pm
 

Join: August 24th 2004 11:37 pm
Posts: 180
So are you against musicians recording new version of their own songs? Or how about when a band releases a remixed and re-mastered version of an album? It's not exactly the same as before, so does that mean it has lesser value?


Post Posted: August 29th 2004 2:16 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 26th 2004 6:38 am
Posts: 85
Quote:
Why in the fuck would you change Anakin? Luke does not know what his father looks like..HE HAS ONLY SEEN HIM OLD..


If you wanna get nitpicky, then how does Luke recognize Sabastian Shaw without looking like "Humpty Dumpty playing a harmonica"?.

I think it's a reasonable assumtion he knows it's his father, aside from the fact Luke can sense shit through the force, like his father for one..People with the force can sense each other..

If you wanna bitch because it was changed, that's fine, I understand, personally I don't care for some of the revisions myself, but this one seems fine by me.


Post Posted: August 29th 2004 3:47 pm
 
User avatar

Join: February 11th 2004 10:51 am
Posts: 111
Location: o.paa@quicknet.ch
I never liked how they displayed Morpheus in Matrix 2 and 3.

Speaking of Star Wars I think it's a good idea to have Hayden in. It even makes perfect sense.

Stop complaining, it's too late now. I'm even sure that you all got your neat little OT videos stored somewhere at home. Watch them and be happy.


Post Posted: September 6th 2004 3:07 pm
 

Join: May 11th 2004 2:11 pm
Posts: 142
You know, maybe Agent Smith is right. Maybe it's his God-given right to receive these films on DVD. I mean, after all -- Lucas is a sinner if he doesn't release the films on every conceivable format.

Your argument is only valid if he snatches away your old videotapes. That's the difference quite a few of the whining "purists" can't understand. He hasn't stolen anything away from you. He's simply releasing his version on the new formats. The minute he comes to your doorstop, punches you in the face, and takes your copies, then you have the right to bitch.

And it's ironic you make the comparison, Agent Smith, as it's over-obsessed fans like you that put the franchise on the level of Star Trek.


Post Posted: September 6th 2004 3:43 pm
 

Join: August 6th 2004 6:29 am
Posts: 857
The Dark Shape wrote:
Your argument is only valid if he snatches away your old videotapes. That's the difference quite a few of the whining "purists" can't understand. He hasn't stolen anything away from you. He's simply releasing his version on the new formats. The minute he comes to your doorstop, punches you in the face, and takes your copies, then you have the right to bitch.


Points well made, but unfortunately this isn't really what the "purists" are bitching about. See, they have no problem whatsoever with CGI and digital tools as long as they're only used as they see fit. It's OK to clean up matte lines beyond the capabilities of 70's-era film technology, OK to enhance sound beyond the limits of the pre-THX era when these films were made.

But actually alter scenes? Nah -- that's a step off of the beaten path that's been worn down through their skulls by hundreds and hundreds of viewings. That's verging into different territory. And God knows that the "true" Star Wars fan, adventrous as he might once have been, shouldn't have to learn new tricks at this stage.

These are the people it would be impossible to please. If the OT were released on DVD today in its original form, they'd still find something to bitch about. Edges would be "too sharp." Matte lines would be "too clean." The score would be "too loud." That "warm nostalgic feeling" imparted by scratches and dust on the print would be missing.

The saddest part is that eventually they'd discover that they couldn't sleep at night if they didn't own every single iteration of Star Wars on home video, so they'd go out and buy the updated versions ANYWAY -- and then bitch about them.

FUCK 'EM. Let's move on.


Post Posted: September 6th 2004 5:28 pm
 

Join: April 28th 2004 8:45 am
Posts: 299
I don’t think I have ever read a point so short and so quaint that totally summed up the truth so truthfully. You really can’t pacify a crying baby for long. Babies always find something else to cry about. Time to move on, words to live by.


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  
cron




millenniumfalcon.com©
phpBB©