It is currently May 1st 2025 2:12 pm




  Page Previous  1, 2
Post Posted: June 25th 2004 6:36 pm
 

Join: March 15th 2004 8:56 pm
Posts: 160
Location: LA
Darth_Zidious wrote:
In the GG webdoc, he says:

"All of these films have the ultimate bad guy, which is the Emperor. But in addition to that there is the sidekick, be him Darth Vader in episodes four, five and six, Darth Maul in episode one, or Count Dooku in episode two."

"So, we're always trying to work with a sidekick, an apprentice to the Dark Lord."

Lucas was just rambling.

Vanda wrote:
Hmmm, I thought he was pretty clear with what he said. Put that together with this other quote and it's crystal clear to me:

Quote:
The whole issue of having apprentices, poor Darth Sidious trying to replenish his apprentice supply, is one of the main plot points." - George Lucas - Empire Magazine 07/99


Or you can choose to think he was just rambling. I personally listen very carefully with how Lucas perceives these movies, as he is the one who this story comes from.

As far as GG being designed as a droid ... it was pretty clear in that webdoc that the designers could do anything that they wanted, it didn't have to be a droid/cyborg. All they had to go on was that he needed to look scary and he was fufilling the role of "Droid General" aka "The new bad guy". Just because they called him 'Droid General' doesn't mean he has to be a droid himself, it just means that he is the "General of the Droids".


Post Posted: June 25th 2004 7:14 pm
 

Join: January 22nd 2004 8:12 pm
Posts: 323
Thundercracker wrote:
I'm not sure if I made any type of point but there it is anyway.


It made perfect sense. And if that is actually how it went down I wouldn't have a problem with it at all. Problem is, we've seen shots of Obi-Wan and three greenscreen foes breaking out their sabers/lightsaber blocking thingees and going at it. That looks like the start of the fight. And even if Grievous and henchmen are using the lightsaber blocking thingees instead of sabers, that still sucks. They're still fighting and holding their own hand to hand with a Jedi.

Anyway, I'd still prefer that to lightsabers. I'd really like it if Obi-Wan takes out the bodyguards with his saber and then Grievous either beats Obi-Wan or somehow Obi-Wan loses his saber. Grievous pulls out the sabers to present the death blow like he did with Shaak Ti, and Obi-Wan reaches over, pulls Grievous' own blaster out of its holster, and shoots him in the guts. That'd be pretty cool. Would also explain where Obi got the blaster from, since I assume he doesn't carry one around.

SnakePlisken wrote:
As far as GG being designed as a droid ... it was pretty clear in that webdoc that the designers could do anything that they wanted, it didn't have to be a droid/cyborg. All they had to go on was that he needed to look scary and he was fufilling the role of "Droid General" aka "The new bad guy". Just because they called him 'Droid General' doesn't mean he has to be a droid himself, it just means that he is the "General of the Droids".


In the webdoc, George says "I could like this one, if we went with a droid. That means that George was not averse to the idea of Grievous being a droid. Which means that Grievous is not Force Sensitive.


Post Posted: June 25th 2004 7:31 pm
 

Join: June 19th 2004 12:14 am
Posts: 33
Location: Mustafar
Well if certain people are "Force sensitive" as has been clearly established in the SW movies there is always a possibility that Grievous was "Force sensitive" when he was an entirely flesh creature (if he wasn't hatched out of some laboratory/factory!) I like to think that the Emperor used a "Force sensitive" creature and combined it with the Republic's best droid technology, trained it/ programmed it to use light sabres and BAM! You have what became General Greivous-- the Jedi hunter! Kind of a percursor to Darth Vader really(more machine than man). All purely speculation on my part but at least my version doesn't violate the "Rule of two Sith."


Post Posted: June 25th 2004 8:18 pm
 

Join: May 12th 2004 12:32 am
Posts: 397
I'm not sure where people are getting the notion that Jedi should be invincible fighters. I thought Jango and the droidekas pretty well established the opposite.


Post Posted: June 25th 2004 8:40 pm
 

Join: June 19th 2004 12:14 am
Posts: 33
Location: Mustafar
I didn't mean to infer that I thought that Jedi/Sith were invincible fighters. It has already been established that they are not (Qui-Gon Jinn, Darth Maul, and all of the Jedi who fell in the battle of Geonosis can provide testament of that).

I simply think that it adds meat to the character and if i could I would ask GL to consider it.

If Greivous simply proves to be a saber weilding cyborg though, it only would show how TRULY badass he was with light sabers!

I think that he is a marvelous creation and commend Lucas for coming up with it. Gary Oldman is the perfect choice to voice him.

Quote:
"The board is set; the pieces are moving..."
Gandalf


BRING ON EPISODE III: REVENGE OF THE SITH


Post Posted: June 25th 2004 9:33 pm
 

Join: January 22nd 2004 8:12 pm
Posts: 323
Eye_H8_U wrote:
I like to think that the Emperor used a "Force sensitive" creature and combined it with the Republic's best droid technology, trained it/ programmed it to use light sabres and BAM! You have what became General Greivous-- the Jedi hunter! Kind of a percursor to Darth Vader really(more machine than man). All purely speculation on my part but at least my version doesn't violate the "Rule of two Sith."


How does this not violate the rule of two? The whole purpose of the Rule of Two is so that the Sith don't destroy each other because there's too many of them. That's why the obvious answer to the question "why didn't the Emperor just clone a Sith and make an army of clones!?!" is always "because then they'd be a threat to his power. If they have the Force they can infight and possibly overthrow him and take over power for themselves."

Whether you want to call it Sith or "dark Force user", Sidious training it (or even it existing and being in cahoots with Sids) does violate the essence of the rule of two, because Grievous could decide that he wants all the power and overthrow Sids.


Post Posted: June 25th 2004 9:36 pm
 

Join: January 22nd 2004 8:12 pm
Posts: 323
vanillazinger wrote:
I'm not sure where people are getting the notion that Jedi should be invincible fighters. I thought Jango and the droidekas pretty well established the opposite.


The Jedi were OVERWHELMINGLY outnumbered on Geonosis. You try and block ten shots coming at you at once. It's just not possible.

However, in one to one combat with a lightsaber, a Jedi trains his entire life to use that weapon. He can block blaster shots that travel at tremendous speeds. He is the master. ...and then some half droid half living thing non-Force-user can pick one up and do battle with a Jedi and win?

Pfft.


Post Posted: June 25th 2004 10:49 pm
 

Join: May 12th 2004 12:32 am
Posts: 397
Vanda wrote:
However, in one to one combat with a lightsaber, a Jedi trains his entire life to use that weapon. He can block blaster shots that travel at tremendous speeds. He is the master. ...and then some half droid half living thing non-Force-user can pick one up and do battle with a Jedi and win?

The Jedi are good, but let's not go overboard. Heck, Lucas didn't even bother to show us when Obi-Wan got whupped by a couple of droidekas on Geonosis. It was a given.

There's an assumption that many people seem to make (even the OS is guilty of it) that somehow lightsabers are only usable through the Force. I don't think Lucas ever subscribed to that, and it looks like Grievous is proof at last. Look, if you gave Nick Gillard a real lightsaber, I bet he could hold his own against a lesser Jedi. It's an exceptional weapon, but ultimately it's just a weapon. Any swordman could become proficient with it. The Force lends the Jedi an extra edge, of course, and their precognition allows them to block laser bolts and whatnot. But give an expert swordsman (which presumably Grievous is, if he fights Jedi with lightsabers) the added advantage of an armored body, bionic strength, speed and coordination, and then four equally-proficient arms -- and yes, you've got the ingredients for a villain who's up to the challenge of fighting a master Jedi. I don't see what the problem is.

(However, I've also seen this discussion played out enough times to know that neither of us will change the other's opinion. :))


Post Posted: June 25th 2004 11:58 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 31st 2003 7:00 am
Posts: 956
:roll:


Post Posted: June 26th 2004 1:14 am
 
User avatar

Join: February 22nd 2004 1:16 pm
Posts: 630
Quote:
ANAKIN
Well, ahhh... you're a Jedi Knight, aren't you?

QUI-GON
What makes you think that?

ANAKIN
I saw your laser sword. Only Jedi carry that kind of weapon.

QUI-GON leans back and slowly smiles.

QUI-GON
Perhaps I killed a Jedi and stole it from him.

ANAKIN
I don't think so... No one can kill a Jedi Knight.

QUI-GON
I wish that were so...


Qui-Gon = Grievous!!!! :chewbacca:

Seriously, I thought it was well established (the above quote is just an example) that the Jedi, while being very, very good fighters, certainly aren't invincible. The whole Order was wiped out, after all.


Post Posted: June 26th 2004 2:50 am
 

Join: February 20th 2004 2:35 pm
Posts: 498
Location: Hell
http://www.kurtphillips.com/grevious-cinefex-big2.jpg
:rock


Post Posted: June 26th 2004 7:28 pm
 
God's Helper
User avatar

Join: April 26th 2004 12:17 am
Posts: 581
Good shit folks. :heavymetal:


Post Posted: June 26th 2004 9:35 pm
 

Join: January 22nd 2004 8:12 pm
Posts: 323
toochilled wrote:
I wish people would ignore the so-called rule of two.

Its not a rule that means there can only ever be two sith, but one that says if there are more then two then they will kill each other off til it gets back to two.




Um, tc:

YODA
Always TWO there are, NO MORE, NO LESS.


Seems pretty clear to me... :?


Post Posted: June 26th 2004 10:25 pm
 

Join: November 10th 2003 6:58 am
Posts: 427
Always TWO there are, NO MORE, NO LESS.

In ESB and ROTJ, there are two Sith. Each is trying to replace the other with a new force user, Luke. Theoretically, Dooku and Sidious could be looking to replace each other with Anakin or Grievous. I don't believe that, but there is nothing definitive that proves or disproves it.


Post Posted: June 26th 2004 10:52 pm
 

Join: January 22nd 2004 8:12 pm
Posts: 323
Darth_Zidious wrote:
Always TWO there are, NO MORE, NO LESS.

In ESB and ROTJ, there are two Sith. Each is trying to replace the other with a new force user, Luke. Theoretically, Dooku and Sidious could be looking to replace each other with Anakin or Grievous. I don't believe that, but there is nothing definitive that proves or disproves it.



That doesn't make three though. If Vader or Sidious or Dooku had succeeded in luring Luke or Anakin or Obi-Wan than Task Numero Uno would've been to take out the other Sith. The period of time when there'd be three, persay, would be very short or even non-existant if the choice to become a Sith involves killing another Sith to take his place, a la Sidious-Luke-Vader at the end of ROTJ.


Post Posted: June 27th 2004 12:11 am
 

Join: November 10th 2003 6:58 am
Posts: 427
That doesn't make....

My point is that nothing you said rules anything out. We need more data in order to know the answer. I don't believe that GG is going to be an apprentice, but my opinion is based on gut feeling, not evidence.


Post Posted: June 27th 2004 8:59 am
 

Join: January 22nd 2004 8:12 pm
Posts: 323
lukeskyfakker wrote:
Look at the Clone Wars - Assaj Ventress, to be precise. She wasn't a sith - Dooku told her that right before he schooled her ass; BUT - she was a dark Jedi.



That's all EU. It has no bearing on the movies.


Post Posted: June 27th 2004 9:43 am
 

Join: May 12th 2004 12:32 am
Posts: 397
Darth Hade wrote:
Without the ability to block a Force attack (i.e. being Force sensitive), how can Grievous possibly stand up to Jedi telekinesis?

The same way that Jango Fett, the Acklay, the droidekas, et al. did.


Post Posted: June 27th 2004 7:12 pm
 

Join: January 22nd 2004 8:12 pm
Posts: 323
And, semi back on topic, I like the Grievous face on the cover of the Insider. I think it looks much more believable than the Boba Fett cover picture or the Clone Wars drawing. Obviously he needs to actually look photorealistic next to living actors, and this cover shot is a step in the right direction for ILM.


Post Posted: June 27th 2004 11:28 pm
 

Join: May 12th 2004 12:32 am
Posts: 397
Vanda wrote:
Anyway, I think I'm warming up to the Grievous idea. So you were wrong, vanillazinger. Sometimes rational arguments DO change opinions. :)

Oh sure, go and make me look bad. :)


Post Posted: June 28th 2004 2:24 am
 

Join: June 19th 2004 12:14 am
Posts: 33
Location: Mustafar
Going with the argument that Greivous has no ability to use the Force-- I can imagine that his creators still wanted him to be as lethal a Jedi hunter as they could make him. So it would go without saying that his enhanced cybernetics allow him to do ungodly things with light sabers. He should be programmed in all known light saber fighting styles and he should be faster than most Jedi when using them. Because of his computer processors he can multitask and this allows him twirl up to four sabers at once which would be enough to give any Jedi a hard time.

So even without use of the Force this character has the potential to be a truly badass and memorable villlian.


Post Posted: June 28th 2004 6:17 am
 
User avatar

Join: June 22nd 2004 4:44 am
Posts: 34
Location: Leeds, UK
Say Grievous does use the Force, how will we see this on-screen? Unless he does something telekinetic, how can Lucas show us that he's using the force without us just putting it down to him being at least part mechanical?


Post Posted: June 28th 2004 10:07 am
 

Join: October 31st 2003 7:00 am
Posts: 532
Eye_H8_U wrote:
So even without use of the Force this character has the potential to be a truly badass and memorable villlian.


"Whoah! I know Kung-Fu!"


Post Posted: June 28th 2004 12:03 pm
 

Join: May 25th 2004 4:39 pm
Posts: 14
Here's a thought on his "unorthodox fighting form". What if he uses both his blasters and lightsabres in closerange combat? Think about how deadly this combination could be for a jedi to have to handle. Plus I think it would visually make it an impressive battle to watch.


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Page Previous  1, 2



Jump to:  




millenniumfalcon.com©
phpBB©