dromag wrote:
I enjoy plenty of things most people hate including the Prequels. I enjoyed them for what they are: "a source of entertainment" and I accept the fact that there are many people that don't. At this point no one is going to change anyone's mind about the prequels. They are what they are.
Then what's the point of this forum? To jerk off together about how great Lucas is and discuss how the random alien in the background of the opera scene is a metaphor for the Buddhist cycle of death and rebirth?
And yeah, the prequels are fine as "a source of entertainment" on par with dumb summer blockbusters like Transformers and Battleship. I mean, on some level they're just average slightly-smarter-than-mindless sci-fi action popcorn flicks. They're not awful by movie standards, just very mediocre, but they're awful by Star Wars standards. Compared to the original trilogy, they're sub-par at best. Even Return of the Jedi was leagues and bounds better than the best parts of the prequels, and Return of the Jedi was nowhere near as good as the first two films.
It's like that dumb I, Robot movie. If they'd just stuck with the original plan and called it Hardwired, I would've been content with spending :10bux: to chill out for two hours and watch Will Smith punch evil robots and make wisecracks. Probably would've forgotten about it as soon as I left the theater, but whatever, not every sci-fi movie has to be Blade Runner or even Terminator. But then they had to slap the name of Issac Asimov's most famous book onto it, so when I went in expecting a serious and mindful work of speculative fiction and got "Aw Hell Naw", it was a pretty big disappointment.

If the prequels had just been random big-budget roller coasters that had nothing to do with Star Wars, I'd have been content to sit back, enjoy the ride, rank them a solid 5.5/10 on IMDB, and forget about them, instead of complaining about them on internet forums 9 years later.
