It is currently May 1st 2025 5:21 pm




  Page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Post Posted: April 2nd 2014 4:35 am
 
Site Admin
User avatar

Join: May 25th 1977 7:00 am
Posts: 1669
Cast announcements pronto for Christs sake


Post Posted: April 2nd 2014 11:20 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
I've been thinking about the plot, specifically how Episode VII is going to start.

Will it feel like a "new beginning" where the characters and situations need to be gradually introduced or will Abrams take a page from Episode IV and kick off the adventure with several components already in place? For example, might Adam Driver's character be a fallen Jedi who had already turned to the dark side some time between VI and VII (pupil of Luke, maybe even a Solo child)? Has the new war already begun between the New Republic and the armies of a reborn Sith?

I believe Abrams will follow the OT's "lived-in" universe formula and that includes the stage of the story. I don't think we need to know exactly what happened to Driver's character (if indeed he is a villain) or what led to the disruption of the peace since the end of ROTJ. Star Wars works best when the characters and situations play out organically; I think Abrams knows this and Episode VII won't be plagued by the exposition and politics of Episode I.


Post Posted: April 3rd 2014 2:30 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 8th 2005 5:51 pm
Posts: 12
CoGro wrote:
For example, might Adam Driver's character be a fallen Jedi who had already turned to the dark side some time between VI and VII (pupil of Luke, maybe even a Solo child)? Has the new war already begun between the New Republic and the armies of a reborn Sith?


Exactly! If Adam Driver is indeed a former Pupil of Luke and thus a Fallen Jedi, he might kill Luke in a 1 vs 1 like Vader did Ben, Luke becomes a Force Ghost and then the circle would be complete :-)


Post Posted: April 6th 2014 12:30 am
 

Join: November 10th 2003 5:30 am
Posts: 98
wtf?!?

Disney Chairman Alan Horn: Casting Almost Complete, SW7 Already Shooting

pretty sneaky, sis!

:chewbacca:


Post Posted: April 6th 2014 7:04 am
 
Medium Pimpin
User avatar

Join: February 3rd 2004 8:03 pm
Posts: 513
Location: UK
BlackCriminalGangster2050 wrote:


probably just shooting location plates around the world they can do that without any cast (or the movie is already half done they just not announcing anything! :o )


Post Posted: April 6th 2014 4:47 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 31st 2003 7:00 am
Posts: 631
Location: Michigan
You guys, they'll totally unveil the cast on or around Dec. 18, 2015. :roll:


Post Posted: April 6th 2014 9:13 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
May the fourth is less than a month away. Is big Star Wars news being saved for Star Wars day?


Post Posted: April 7th 2014 3:57 am
 

Join: January 31st 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 579
Location: Australia
They'd better announce something BIG soon.
I am tired of all these rumours and bullshit stories.
We need something solid, from the source!


Post Posted: April 7th 2014 9:35 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 2nd 2010 7:40 am
Posts: 632
E_CHU_TA! wrote:
May the fourth is less than a month away. Is big Star Wars news being saved for Star Wars day?


I'd put money on it.


Post Posted: April 7th 2014 3:11 pm
 

Join: January 31st 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 579
Location: Australia
Chewie is back!


Post Posted: April 7th 2014 3:26 pm
 
User avatar

Join: February 22nd 2004 1:16 pm
Posts: 630
Mike_Droideka wrote:


:chewbacca: :chewbacca: :chewbacca: :chewbacca:
:chewbacca: :chewbacca: :chewbacca: :chewbacca:


Post Posted: April 8th 2014 4:05 am
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
That's nice. But there is absolutely nothing in the Hollywood Reporter story that proves this. It's just more wishful speculating.


Post Posted: April 10th 2014 7:43 am
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
And more casting rumors. Someone named Maisie Richardson-Sellers:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-v ... ion-693268


Post Posted: April 10th 2014 11:02 am
 

Join: January 31st 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 579
Location: Australia
A complete unknown -- yes!
Precisely what the saga needs.


Post Posted: April 10th 2014 11:02 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
Please don't be Obi-wan's daughter or granddaughter. Please.


Post Posted: April 10th 2014 4:38 pm
 

Join: January 31st 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 579
Location: Australia
Why would that bother you CoGro?


Post Posted: April 10th 2014 6:28 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
Because it's convenient, it retcons the character of Obi-wan Kenobi and it's lazy storytelling.

And if you haven't noticed, Obi-wan Kenobi is white.


Post Posted: April 10th 2014 6:40 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
Obi-wan's race doesn't preclude him from having an adopted daughter / granddaughter of another race or species. Plus, who's to say that Obi-wan wasn't an adoptee of the Kenobi family (who arn't white)? Since we don't know about Obi-wan's family, it wouldn't really be a retcon.


Post Posted: April 10th 2014 7:04 pm
 
User avatar

Join: May 2nd 2005 7:26 am
Posts: 1998
Location: Down the rabbit hole
http://io9.com/karen-gillans-hair-will- ... s=og.likes


Post Posted: April 10th 2014 7:08 pm
 

Join: November 10th 2003 5:30 am
Posts: 98
Obi-Wan's (or Luke's, if it's his daughter) skin color also doesn't preclude his biological granddaughter from being a woman of color. Folks have been getting their swirl on for a long time, and presumably in galaxies far far away, too; look no further than Barack Obama's own very white mom. It would actually thematically make a ton of sense if Luke's daughter/son were mixed race...Luke started out as an avatar for Lucas himself (wanting to get off Tatooine/out of Modesto, driving a fast Skyhopper/car, "Luke S." = "Lucas" ffs!!), so knowing that Luke had married a black woman and had a kid/kids with her at some point nicely mirrors late-life Lucas, who recently married a black woman and had a kid with her.


Post Posted: April 10th 2014 7:28 pm
 

Join: January 31st 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 579
Location: Australia
CoGro wrote:
Because it's convenient, it retcons the character of Obi-wan Kenobi and it's lazy storytelling.

And if you haven't noticed, Obi-wan Kenobi is white.



The actress in question, is not 100% black.


Post Posted: April 10th 2014 7:55 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
Mike_Droideka wrote:
The actress in question, is not 100% black.


Still doesn't address the other more important points.


Post Posted: April 11th 2014 9:27 pm
 
User avatar

Title: Mortician
Join: May 26th 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 1923
Location: Progress City
BlackCriminalGangster2050 wrote:
Obi-Wan's (or Luke's, if it's his daughter) skin color also doesn't preclude his biological granddaughter from being a woman of color. Folks have been getting their swirl on for a long time, and presumably in galaxies far far away, too; look no further than Barack Obama's own very white mom. It would actually thematically make a ton of sense if Luke's daughter/son were mixed race...Luke started out as an avatar for Lucas himself (wanting to get off Tatooine/out of Modesto, driving a fast Skyhopper/car, "Luke S." = "Lucas" ffs!!), so knowing that Luke had married a black woman and had a kid/kids with her at some point nicely mirrors late-life Lucas, who recently married a black woman and had a kid with her.


Wow. Right?!?!? Nails, and hitting on the head and such. I'm of the impression that any guesses made as to the genealogy of any single character are just that at this point; guesses. But ruling anything out seems just as presumptive. Except for Obi-Wanspring, because Kenobi having had children of any kind makes zero sense, from a believability stand-point.


Post Posted: April 11th 2014 11:10 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
TroyObliX wrote:
Except for Obi-Wanspring, because Kenobi having had children of any kind makes zero sense, from a believability stand-point.


The point.

If Obi-wan is the natural grandfather to this woman, it's a stupid idea.

If she is the daughter of Luke, who has married a black woman, that's a different story entirely.

E_CHU_TA! wrote:
Obi-wan's race doesn't preclude him from having an adopted daughter / granddaughter of another race or species. Plus, who's to say that Obi-wan wasn't an adoptee of the Kenobi family (who arn't white)? Since we don't know about Obi-wan's family, it wouldn't really be a retcon.


Would this have happened before or after he lived in solitary exile? We have been given a pretty complete picture of Obi-wan's story and life via the movies and Clone Wars. At no point does it fit that he would adopt a child. It would be more than a stretch.


Post Posted: April 12th 2014 7:09 am
 
User avatar

Title: Mortician
Join: May 26th 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 1923
Location: Progress City
CoGro wrote:
If Obi-wan is the natural grandfather to this woman, it's a stupid idea.

Yeah, any Kenobi family connection would be a stretch. To say it isn't a 'retcon' is just dabbling in semantics. Why not do more with the characters we are given, instead of linking them back to someone we already have a connection with? Use the story time it would take to explain it to make me give a shit about them as they are. An interesting daughter of a nobody would be more palatable than a mediocre, lazily shoehorned into the story offspring of someone who was supposed to have never known his family.


Post Posted: April 12th 2014 8:17 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
TroyObliX wrote:
Yeah, any Kenobi family connection would be a stretch. To say it isn't a 'retcon' is just dabbling in semantics. Why not do more with the characters we are given, instead of linking them back to someone we already have a connection with? Use the story time it would take to explain it to make me give a shit about them as they are. An interesting daughter of a nobody would be more palatable than a mediocre, lazily shoehorned into the story offspring of someone who was supposed to have never known his family.


Exactly. There are 35 years separating Episodes VI and VII: PLENTY of room for NEW character development and story. Not every character needs to be linked to those from the PT or OT, especially if I have to distract myself from the movie by rolling my eyes or justifying why I should believe this.

That's generally my problem with Jango Fett / Boba Fett. There didn't need to be a father / son relationship there for us to appreciate either Jango or Boba Fett. Why couldn't Boba just have a backstory shrouded in mystery? He could be an orphan adopted by Death Watch, an Imperial gone rogue, whatever. Jango could have been Jango "Smith" and the story would have still worked fine. What was the ultimate payoff to having them be related? The 2 second moment where Boba holds Jango's helmet on Geonosis? What did that death motivate him to do exactly? All he ended up doing was being a bounty hunter - a gun for hire. He has never been portrayed as a "revenge" guy so what exactly was the purpose of setting up that moment? The answer: NOTHING. It was lazy, it was convenient, it made Fett's origin less interesting and it shrunk the galaxy. Not to mention it meant we had to have another child actor give a stiff performance.

Don't do it with Kenobi. Make a new character or keep the saga consistent by making her a Skywalker (if she's even in it).


Post Posted: April 12th 2014 8:35 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 2nd 2010 7:40 am
Posts: 632
CoGro wrote:
There didn't need to be a father / son relationship there for us to appreciate either Jango or Boba Fett.


I don't think that was the main purpose. Lucas just wanted to expand Boba's backstory/origin and that was the version he was satisfied with. To call something lazy just because you don't like it is a bit childish.


Post Posted: April 12th 2014 10:03 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
Alexrd wrote:
CoGro wrote:
There didn't need to be a father / son relationship there for us to appreciate either Jango or Boba Fett.


I don't think that was the main purpose. Lucas just wanted to expand Boba's backstory/origin and that was the version he was satisfied with. To call something lazy just because you don't like it is a bit childish.


While I rarely respond to any of your posts, I'll indulge this one.

Storytelling is just as much about what shouldn't be told. That's the entire concept of a "lived in" universe is (it's not just about the set design). Things don't need to be EXPRESSLY explained to you what had happened or what is happening at all times. That's why films get criticized for being "exposition heavy:" it doesn't provide the story or characters enough room to breath.

It's more childish to say "because that's what Lucas wanted to do" as if the man is infallible and can't make a mistake, and somehow people aren't allowed to judge his story decisions because, well, he invented Star Wars. He's got the right to tell his own story just as I'm allowed to point out his mistakes. Just because Lucas says 2 + 2 = 5 doesn't make it so. When you "just want to do something" without thinking it through that's called LAZY.

There is a saying that good design is functional. It's applies to storytelling as well: if something is simply "window dressing" or cosmetic (as Jango's relationship to Boba is: designed simply to give the audience a "so THAT's where he came from!" moment, and a bad one at that) then it shouldn't be done.

You can go on being the blind sheep you are, but please let us big boys continue having logical, rational and engaging conversation.


Post Posted: April 12th 2014 10:29 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 2nd 2010 7:40 am
Posts: 632
CoGro wrote:
While I rarely respond to any of your posts, I'll indulge this one.


Oh please...

CoGro wrote:
It's more childish to say "because that's what Lucas wanted to do" as if the man is infallible and can't make a mistake,


Where's the correlation? How does Lucas deciding the story he wants to tell makes him infallible? It's not about infallibility or the ability to make mistakes. How is this childish?

CoGro wrote:
and somehow people aren't allowed to judge his story decisions because, well, he invented Star Wars.


People aren't allowed? Nice strawman.

CoGro wrote:
He's got the right to tell his own story just as I'm allowed to point out his mistakes. Just because Lucas says 2 + 2 = 5 doesn't make it so.


Tha's why math is not art. Math is not subjective, nor is it about taste. Art is and that's what movies are. And you haven't pointed out mistakes. You've pointed out your personal preferences over the story Lucas chose to tell while using the pretentious term "lazy" to somehow justify his inability to meet your preferences.

CoGro wrote:
if something is simply "window dressing" or cosmetic (as Jango's relationship to Boba is: designed simply to give the audience a "so THAT's where he came from!" moment, and a bad one at that) then it shouldn't be done.


Because you are the one who decides for all of us what Jango and Boba's relationship represents and is designed for...

CoGro wrote:
You can go on being the blind sheep you are, but please let us big boys continue having logical, rational and engaging conversation.


Now those who don't share your opinion and point out your pretentiousness and condescending attitude are blind sheep? And how can you even advocate logic and reason while using weak fallacies like ad hominem? Hypocritical much?


Post Posted: April 12th 2014 4:25 pm
 
User avatar

Title: Mortician
Join: May 26th 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 1923
Location: Progress City
As a fan of internet fighting, I guess I'd like to stoke the flames here. There isn't much more than colorful speculation at this point yet anyways.

:vflamethrower:

The above discussion really struck me as entertaining when Alexrd posted "To call something lazy just because you don't like it is a bit childish". CoGro's responses, while aggressive, were not out of line for the fun-factor this board represents. They were also pretty damned accurate, as a verbalization of where this plot point went off the rails for many fans, but he stepped into the trap of equating art and logic (math), which Alexrd 'almost' got him on.

But you don't win for that, Alexrd. Sometimes, you have to take your own medicine. The Jango/Boba relationship IS lazy storytelling. Am I going to dwell on it? No, within the first fifteen minutes of TPM I knew that the PT was never going to be what I thought it was going to be. I've stopped trying to analyze it in that way. I accept that Lucas told the story he wanted to. I liked looking at it, and while I still watch all of those films a few times a year, it could have been so much more. But I'm a better writer than he is. That's not a slam, I'm just really, really good. You should hear some of the crap I tell people in real life. I'd have been shot in the face by now if I wasn't creative enough to make shit up.

But back to your fight. I have to give it to CoGro, mainly because Alexrd got all 'art is not to be judged' and sensitive in a place where things are meant to be torn apart and analyzed; critiqued for their intrinsic value and sorted ad nauseum. If it's yes men and civility you're looking for, this is going to get lame quick. I'm civil to people on facebook, because everybody's god damned grandma is on facebook. That aint why I come here. Boom.

No civil-minded discussion board has one of these
:vfuckoff: :nerd: :ass2mouth: :execution: :slapfight:

I <3 u, MF.


Post Posted: April 12th 2014 5:29 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 2nd 2010 7:40 am
Posts: 632
TroyObliX wrote:
They were also pretty damned accurate, as a verbalization of where this plot point went off the rails for many fans,


And many others were fine with it. But that's not the point.

TroyObliX wrote:
Sometimes, you have to take your own medicine. The Jango/Boba relationship IS lazy storytelling.


How? Lazy implies lack of work, care or effort. How does their relationship show any of that? The mere fact that a relationship exists, and is portrayed in the movie while being related to the main plot shows the complete opposite. You may like it or dislike it, and discuss what could have been done better to tell that same story. But to call an original story lazy just "does not compute".

TroyObliX wrote:
mainly because Alexrd got all 'art is not to be judged'


Ah, another ficticious quote that I never wrote. You can judge art as long as that judgement isn't treated as fact.


Post Posted: April 12th 2014 9:19 pm
 
User avatar

Title: Mortician
Join: May 26th 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 1923
Location: Progress City
Ah ha!! I didn't use actual quotes. I was paraphrasing what my impression of your implication felt like with that last part, zing!

This has gotten all Oroboros and shit. Chasing our tails, arguing over the minutia, and THAT is somewhat childish but all in good fun. However, your pussifying of the debate is kind of boring.

If lazy implies "lack of work, care or effort", I suppose C3-P0 being built by Anakin is a better example of this 'useless connectivity' concept, but it fits the Fetts pretty well too.

But that's my 'opinion', and not fact. Pre-touché for you there :)

On a side note, I wonder if the Marvel-influence over at Disney will inspire any sort of sexification of the SW Universe. The way Disney keeps pushing Scarlet Johansen's rump into every 20 minutes of story-time gives me a new hope.


Post Posted: April 13th 2014 9:05 am
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
TroyObliX wrote:
The way Disney keeps pushing Scarlet Johansen's rump into every 20 minutes of story-time gives me a new hope.


I didn't think Scarlet was your type. You know like not enough Jabba the Huttness in the hind-quarterly.


Post Posted: April 13th 2014 1:52 pm
 
User avatar

Title: Mortician
Join: May 26th 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 1923
Location: Progress City
Oh, she'll do. Yeah, she would do nicely. Mounted upon my face.

I have opened my mind to new things over the last few years, and while I do 'prefer' them a bit meatier, Miss Johansen walking toward me, backwards, would be a most welcome visage.


Post Posted: April 15th 2014 2:59 pm
 

Join: July 22nd 2011 8:59 pm
Posts: 36
TroyObliX wrote:
I suppose C3-P0 being built by Anakin is a better example of this 'useless connectivity' concept, but it fits the Fetts pretty well too.



If Anakin building C3P0 wasn't lazy (which it was) then scrapping the idea of having Padme installing his coverings in favor of really poorly shot green screen shots of C3P0 pasted over a Tatooine stock shot was. Seriously- those couple shots of C3P0 in AOTC may be the worst technically crafted parts of the prequels. Its something that i've never really heard anyone talk about but its one of those little details that just add up to show what a mess the prequels are.


Post Posted: April 26th 2014 10:14 am
 

Join: February 16th 2004 11:19 pm
Posts: 11
I find relief that they will go in a different direction than what has been purposed in the EU. A lot of it sounds great on paper but I don't think it would work as well on screen.


Post Posted: April 26th 2014 11:52 am
 

Join: November 10th 2003 5:30 am
Posts: 98
Fisher's tweet from earlier today:

Quote:
Carrie Fisher @carrieffisher

So my do dog Gary has been spotted in London, but apparently without me. Who has he been seeing? Let me know if you have any clues.


Post Posted: April 26th 2014 2:57 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
It is long passed the point of embarrassing that Disney hasn't announced the trio is back.


Post Posted: April 26th 2014 3:23 pm
 

Join: November 10th 2003 5:30 am
Posts: 98
CoGro wrote:
It is long passed the point of embarrassing that Disney hasn't announced the trio is back.


For real. And you'd think they could get more PR bang for the buck by having two huge cast announcements---the three of them, and then a later announcement with all of the new cast---instead of what looks more and more like it'll be just one big announcement, since they're running out of time before principal photography starts.


Post Posted: April 26th 2014 5:08 pm
 

Join: January 31st 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 579
Location: Australia
If they're waiting for May 4th to officially announce it, then I could forgive them, but if not -- then they're really embarrassing themselves.


Post Posted: April 27th 2014 2:00 pm
 
User avatar

Join: February 22nd 2004 1:16 pm
Posts: 630
Image

Quote:
Met up with @HamillHimself in London today. I wonder why he's here.

https://twitter.com/serafinowicz/status/460490925656268800

HYPEHYPEHYPEHYPE :chewbacca: :chewbacca: :chewbacca:


Post Posted: April 27th 2014 2:31 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
:chewbacca: :chewbacca: :chewbacca:

His face is looking a bit thinner. The hype begins.


Post Posted: April 27th 2014 6:44 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 20th 2004 11:57 pm
Posts: 523
Location: Southern California
CoGro wrote:
:chewbacca: :chewbacca: :chewbacca:

His face is looking a bit thinner. The hype begins.


He's sporting a bit of a beard by the looks of it, too.


Post Posted: April 27th 2014 7:13 pm
 
Bush Pilot
User avatar

Join: March 23rd 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 1483
Might as well throw this out; Harrison is in London as well. Hmmm....

:bounce:

http://www.rexfeatures.com/livefeed/201 ... nt,_london


Post Posted: April 27th 2014 9:42 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/67097

Nice little article by Quint @ AICN showing how much weight Mark Hamill has lost in the last year to prepare for his return as Luke.


Post Posted: April 28th 2014 12:45 am
 
User avatar

Join: May 2nd 2005 7:26 am
Posts: 1998
Location: Down the rabbit hole
Fsck dat....I don't think he's coming back as Luke.

if I had 2 cents, I'd say he's coming back in The Return of Cockknocker (Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back, Again)!


Post Posted: April 28th 2014 5:14 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 2nd 2010 7:40 am
Posts: 632
Joe1138 wrote:
He's sporting a bit of a beard by the looks of it, too.


A Jedi beard™.


Post Posted: April 28th 2014 6:11 am
 
User avatar

Join: December 23rd 2004 11:19 pm
Posts: 467
Location: Left side of right coast
Cryostar wrote:
Fsck dat....I don't think he's coming back as Luke.

if I had 2 cents, I'd say he's coming back in The Return of Cockknocker (Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back, Again)!


Nope, Crow from sushi girl. It's definitely crow, prequel time!

Actually if you look in the mirror off of their right shoulders I am almost certain that is Carrie fishers hand taking the picture with Harrison's phone. It's confirmed here first


Post Posted: April 28th 2014 12:42 pm
 
User avatar

Join: May 2nd 2005 7:26 am
Posts: 1998
Location: Down the rabbit hole
No way, man....it looks like Jason Mewes to me. You know he's got those feminine hands and all.


Post Posted: April 28th 2014 8:50 pm
 
User avatar

Join: February 22nd 2004 1:16 pm
Posts: 630
Quote:
The force is with him, in that he’s got a big table read tomorrow with the cast in London, and so he’s finally going to be forced to fess up shortly. There have been more rumors on this one than any film in recent memory, and here’s the latest.

I’m hearing that Inside Llewyn Davis star Oscar Isaac is in line for a major role, as is Adam Driver and Attack the Block’s John Boyega, both of whom have been rumored. There is also a young girl, and that might be Maisie Richardson-Sellers, an Oxford-trained actress whose casting has been rumored in recent weeks. The new cast members will join returning Star Wars alums Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher and Mark Hamill. The big surprise, I’m told, is that Ford has a gigantic role in the first of the next three films. Disney hasn’t been commenting on any of this, and today’s no different. Stay tuned.


Deadline


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



Jump to:  




millenniumfalcon.com©
phpBB©