It is currently May 1st 2025 5:30 pm




  Page 1, 2  Next
Post Posted: January 26th 2013 12:14 am
 
User avatar

Join: February 22nd 2004 1:16 pm
Posts: 630
source: (starwars.com starwars-is-being-kick-started-with-dynamite-jj-abrams-to-direct-starwars-episodevii.html)

Image



After a bevy of emails and phone calls, the formalities have been wrapped up, and at long last everyone can exhale and properly share the word with an excited Internet. Yes, J.J. Abrams will direct Star Wars: Episode VII, the first of a new series of Star Wars films to come from Lucasfilm under the leadership of Kathleen Kennedy. Abrams will be directing and Academy Award-winning writer Michael Arndt will write the screenplay.

"It's very exciting to have J.J. aboard leading the charge as we set off to make a new Star Wars movie," said Kennedy. "J.J. is the perfect director to helm this. Beyond having such great instincts as a filmmaker, he has an intuitive understanding of this franchise. He understands the essence of the Star Wars experience, and will bring that talent to create an unforgettable motion picture."

George Lucas went on to say "I've consistently been impressed with J.J. as a filmmaker and storyteller." He's an ideal choice to direct the new Star Wars film and the legacy couldn't be in better hands."

"To be a part of the next chapter of the Star Wars saga, to collaborate with Kathy Kennedy and this remarkable group of people, is an absolute honor," J.J. Abrams said. "I may be even more grateful to George Lucas now than I was as a kid."

J.J., his longtime producing partner Bryan Burk, and Bad Robot are on board to produce along with Kathleen Kennedy under the Disney | Lucasfilm banner."

Also consulting on the project are Lawrence Kasdan and Simon Kinberg. Kasdan has a long history with Lucasfilm, as screenwriter on The Empire Strikes Back, Raiders of the Lost Ark and Return of the Jedi. Kinberg was writer on Sherlock Holmes and Mr. and Mrs. Smith.

Abrams and his production company Bad Robot have a proven track record of blockbuster movies that feature complex action, heartfelt drama, iconic heroes and fantastic production values with such credits as Star Trek, Super 8, Mission: Impossible Ghost Protocol, and this year's Star Trek Into Darkness. Abrams has worked with Lucasfilm's preeminent postproduction facilities, Industrial Light & Magic and Skywalker Sound, on all of the feature films he has directed, beginning with Mission: Impossible III. He also created or co-created such acclaimed television series as Felicity, Alias, Lost and Fringe.[/quote]

Also confirms Kasdan is on board.


Post Posted: January 26th 2013 12:24 am
 
Bush Pilot
User avatar

Join: March 23rd 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 1483
Fuck Jar Jar Abrams. His shaky-cam lensflare bullshit will ruin Star Wars! What a hack.

:)

Good to see the announcement.


Post Posted: January 26th 2013 10:29 am
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
Ok, now I'm excited.
:chewbacca: :chewbacca: :chewbacca: :chewbacca: :chewbacca: :chewbacca: :chewbacca:


Post Posted: January 26th 2013 10:51 am
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
The OS has me a little confused. Is the article implying that Muren, Burtt, and Wood will be back as well?


Post Posted: January 26th 2013 12:07 pm
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
It doesn't really say or imply that, but I bet all three of them will be on board.


Post Posted: January 26th 2013 2:43 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 20th 2004 11:57 pm
Posts: 523
Location: Southern California
Yeah I wouldn't be surprised to see them involved, at least in some type of Lucas-like advisory role. I think their quotes were really intended to calm any fears fans might've had about Abrams's involvement.


Post Posted: January 26th 2013 3:12 pm
 

Join: January 31st 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 579
Location: Australia
The way I understand it is that Lucasfilm and ILM are still going to be making the new films.


Post Posted: January 26th 2013 6:18 pm
 

Join: January 11th 2011 10:46 am
Posts: 252
Sooo wait, Bad Robot IS sharing producing duties and credit with LFL? So the opening looks like

DISNEY CASTLE => LFL => BAD ROBOT LOGO => ALTAIAGFFW?

Bring on the very first fan edits of 7 which will no doubt replace all that with the Fox logo.

And Kasdan is now 'consulting', not writing? Well that makes more sense - Disney dropped a bit of cash on him to buy some fan cred.


Post Posted: January 26th 2013 6:59 pm
 

Join: January 31st 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 579
Location: Australia
Inv8r wrote:
Bring on the very first fan edits of 7 which will no doubt replace all that with the Fox logo.

This had me in stitches! It's going to happen!!


Post Posted: January 26th 2013 8:52 pm
 

Join: January 11th 2011 10:46 am
Posts: 252
Oh, it will...t wiiiilllll. It'll be the first fanedit out, and you know it. You know what though, I may just be an old fart, but I remember being taken to the theater to see SW when I was 3 and that damn Fox Fanfare has been part of the experience for me since. It's as much a part of the ritual as ALTA to me. Assuming the film is any good, I will TOTALLY grab a copy that makes that substitution.


Post Posted: January 26th 2013 9:37 pm
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
Maybe John Williams will compose an entirely new Disney/Lucasfilm/Bad Robot fanfare that will rival Alfred Newman's old 20th Century Fox - Cinemascope Extension Fanfare. :jedi:


Post Posted: January 26th 2013 10:35 pm
 

Join: November 10th 2003 5:30 am
Posts: 98
Bandersnatch wrote:
Maybe John Williams will compose an entirely new Disney/Lucasfilm/Bad Robot fanfare that will rival Alfred Newman's old 20th Century Fox - Cinemascope Extension Fanfare. :jedi:


that would rule! failing that, I feel like an even more bombastic version of the first 9 seconds of this could do the trick imagine this over a modified Disney Castle sequence, followed by the LFL and ALTA, and then the main theme:



Post Posted: January 27th 2013 2:53 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
Why does everyone assume the Disney sequence will be part of this?

Have you seen it in ANY Marvel film since the acquisition?

Assuming 20th Century Fox distributes the film, it'll be 20th Century Fox > LFL. I don't even think Bad Robot will be part of the opening credits - JJ Abrams is a fan: he'll want to keep continuity between the films.


Post Posted: January 27th 2013 5:49 pm
 

Join: November 10th 2003 5:30 am
Posts: 98
CoGro wrote:
Why does everyone assume the Disney sequence will be part of this?

Have you seen it in ANY Marvel film since the acquisition?

Assuming 20th Century Fox distributes the film, it'll be 20th Century Fox > LFL. I don't even think Bad Robot will be part of the opening credits - JJ Abrams is a fan: he'll want to keep continuity between the films.


that's a good point about the (boring) Disney sequence not being in front of the Marvel movies, but Marvel studios had some pre-existing deal with Paramount, and then Disney paid them a chunk of change to distribute the movies included under that deal--even though they (Disney) now own them.

20th Century Fox only has distribution (for a little while longer) for the first two SW trilogies, so while I'm pretty sure the rest of the 3D re-releases will have the traditional Fox fanfare, it won't be on anything new. Like everybody else, I think that sucks, and it was one of the first things I thought about when I initially read about Disney taking over. They would be smart to break off a few million to license that fanfare from Fox; if they really want the new films to feel more like the OT, that's a pretty good start.


Post Posted: January 27th 2013 5:54 pm
 

Join: September 20th 2004 6:33 pm
Posts: 376
Location: Southern California
Yeah, Disney logos only appear infront of animated/Pixar movies. Disney is no longer "Walt Disney Pictures" it's just the parent corporation. So Lucasfilm will appear first because Lucasfilm = Disney. It's the same as saying "Disney presents..."

Will Fox have anything to do with this at all? I know Disney had to keep Paramount logos in front of Avengers and Iron Man 3 as part of their deal, but I didn't think Fox was involved with the Lucasfilm sell.

Logos aside, Abrams should be making a sci-fi movie set in the Star Wars universe, NOT Episode 7. The episodes were part of the bigger Skywalker/Vader story, so i'm interested to see how he'll work out a Star Wars story when all the main characters are dead or force ghosts. CGI Yoda? Hayden? Sith reemerge 30 years after Anakin throws Palpatine into a chasm? I think the movie and Abrams would work better without being tied to the Episodes


Post Posted: January 27th 2013 9:59 pm
 

Join: January 11th 2011 10:46 am
Posts: 252
CoGro wrote:
Why does everyone assume the Disney sequence will be part of this? Have you seen it in ANY Marvel film since the acquisition?

Assuming 20th Century Fox distributes the film, it'll be 20th Century Fox > LFL. I don't even think Bad Robot will be part of the opening credits - JJ Abrams is a fan: he'll want to keep continuity between the films.


Ah something else just occurred to me: is JJ DGA?


Post Posted: January 27th 2013 10:01 pm
 

Join: January 11th 2011 10:46 am
Posts: 252
Oh, and anyone else catch the bit of potential news over at AICN? Rumor is that part of Abrams signing on may have been that 2015 is out of the question as he is insisting on a realistic development cycle for this project. If so, hurray for JJ.


Post Posted: January 27th 2013 10:16 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
A delay makes sense to me. A 2015 release date for a tricked-out Star Wars film seems a little rushed.

Regarding a past timeline: Abrams agreed to direct Star Trek in February 2007, casting was announced in late summer and fall 2007, and filming began in November 2007.


Post Posted: January 27th 2013 10:31 pm
 

Join: January 11th 2011 10:46 am
Posts: 252
Buuuuuut, for a more recent timeline, Paramount really, really wanted ST2 in theaters last year and Abrams fought them on the release date because he felt the film needed the extra year. And won. If he HAS talked KK into pushing the film back I may just have raised my expectations for this whole dubious enterprise from 'nil' to 'cautiously optimistic'.


And how about that DGA thing? Lucas resigned his membership so wasn't subject to its rules, Kirsh was a member but Lucas paid his fines to allow ESB to start with LFL and ALTA instead of a directors' credit, and Marquand wasn't a member so for RotJ it wasn't an issue. JJ, presumably is DGA, so does his credt come before the film proper?


Post Posted: January 27th 2013 10:34 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
E_CHU_TA! wrote:
A delay makes sense to me. A 2015 release date for a tricked-out Star Wars film seems a little rushed.

Regarding a past timeline: Abrams agreed to direct Star Trek in February 2007, casting was announced in late summer and fall 2007, and filming began in November 2007.


That is almost the exact same timeline for Episode VII if things hold. He has 2 and a half years to make the movie. I'm sure the art department has been working since before the official announcement about new movies.


Post Posted: January 27th 2013 10:47 pm
 
Bush Pilot
User avatar

Join: March 23rd 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 1483
The last thing they need to do is rush this. Unless production is secretly underway already, I don't see how 2015 is realistic for what we expect from a Star Wars film. Disney is in the business of making money. Would they really push its release beyond the previously successful Memorial Day weekend?


Post Posted: January 27th 2013 10:49 pm
 

Join: January 11th 2011 10:46 am
Posts: 252
I don't know, KK actually said a month ago that pre-production would get going in the spring. As in, wasn't started yet. Quite possibly because, as of the 5-part interview, they don't have a finished story yet. Maybe, MAYBE you have the new trilogy's answer to Ian McCaig working on some doodles now, but you've gotta wonder how much real work has actually been done at this point. All I know is this seems like a hell of a quick turnaround, "and it's making me feel uneasy."


About missing Memorial day, I actually had the though when the date was announced that Disney might be trying to build a Christmas franchise, sort of like Harry Potter, Twilight, and LotR, TH (which will be out of the way when SW hits screens). That way they don't risk stepping on their Marvel properties boxoffice, avoid battling it out with a more SW-like reinvigorated ST franchise in May, and maybe position this as a more prestige franchise.


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 1:01 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
Inv8r wrote:
I don't know, KK actually said a month ago that pre-production would get going in the spring. As in, wasn't started yet. Quite possibly because, as of the 5-part interview, they don't have a finished story yet. Maybe, MAYBE you have the new trilogy's answer to Ian McCaig working on some doodles now, but you've gotta wonder how much real work has actually been done at this point. All I know is this seems like a hell of a quick turnaround, "and it's making me feel uneasy."


About missing Memorial day, I actually had the though when the date was announced that Disney might be trying to build a Christmas franchise, sort of like Harry Potter, Twilight, and LotR, TH (which will be out of the way when SW hits screens). That way they don't risk stepping on their Marvel properties boxoffice, avoid battling it out with a more SW-like reinvigorated ST franchise in May, and maybe position this as a more prestige franchise.


That's actually a really good point. I'm sure they don't want Avengers 2 to hurt SW and vise versa. I'm a traditionalist and would love to see it keep the May 16-25 release date range but it would make sense to movie SW to November/December because of the properties they own now.

I think since we have a story treatment that's been accepted, we've got artwork being churned out. Full out pre-production starting in the spring doesn't critically hurt Episode VII's release date for 2015 I don't think. It seems pretty obvious they don't even have a script, let alone a story for Avengers 2 and that's still on track for a summer 2015 release. I recall George saying in one of the DVD documentaries that he didn't sit down to write Episode II until many months after Episode I had been released. It's not like pre-production on Episode II started on May 20, 1999.


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 3:20 am
 
Bush Pilot
User avatar

Join: March 23rd 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 1483
I looked up when principal photography began for Episodes II and III and they both started shooting in June, two years before their respective May releases. If Arndt has at least finished a pass at the script and there is an assembled art team, I guess it's still conceivable to hit spring 2015.


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 3:52 am
 

Join: October 6th 2004 8:26 pm
Posts: 395
Disney wouldn't commit to a release date an effects-driven feature, esp one like Star Wars, unless they were certain they could meet the date. We shouldn't invent things to worry about.


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 6:55 am
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
Also Lucas's directing technique, as he says in the Ep.III commentary, was to do principle photography, then take several months off, then go back at it in the spring, and go from there. He took a much more leisurely pace when directing the Prequels (for better or worse). I can't see JJ doing that. Once he gets started, it's going to be balls-to-the-wall until it's done.


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 10:35 am
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
More from JJA:


Quote:
As announced last week, J.J. Abrams will be bringing "Star Wars" back to the big screen with Star Wars: Episode VII. We're probably still a few years away from seeing anything from it, but Abrams is excited about working on the film and is committed to making this a movie we all want to see (via E! Online).

"It really is an incredible thing, It's wildly surreal. It's obviously way too early to talk specifics, but I'm excited to actually start it."

Abrams did give his goal for the film in an interview with The Huffington Post.

"I can just say what I want to do: I want to do the fans proud. I want to make sure the story is something that touches people. And we're just getting started. I'm very excited."


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 10:47 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 2nd 2010 7:40 am
Posts: 632
Bandersnatch wrote:
Quote:
"I can just say what I want to do: I want to do the fans proud."


Let's just hope it's not just those hard to please fans who want a copy of the OT.


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 12:47 pm
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
The hard to please fans will never be happy, so fuck 'em. :whatevaho:


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 12:51 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 31st 2003 7:00 am
Posts: 631
Location: Michigan
2015 was so prominently mentioned in Disney's October press release, I can't imagine the studio backtracking from that for the Ep. 7 release date. Of course, my conspiracy theory was that Disney promised to deliver a new SW film sooner than later to its investors that helped finance the $4 billion acquisition. No one has $4 billion laying around, so surely Disney would have had to ask for help in making this transaction. I gotta believe one condition of the transaction was Disney starting to deliver the ST ASAP.

Based on the production schedule for the PT, design work would have been going since last summer (not unrealistic), shooting would have to begin in 5 months, and sets would be having to be built starting around now. I don't think any news has leaked about Disney/LFL reserving studio space, so it's hard to imagine sets being built without having a studio in which to build them.

I don't doubt that concept work started before the official announcement...something this big was obviously in the works long before the announcement, so at whatever point a decision was made that there would be an Ep. 7, and that Lucas would sell his companies, work might have begun. Think of it like Lucas deciding in 1993 to proceed with the PT, and concept work starting in 1994, even though shooting was still far away at that point.

Having said all that, it's hard to believe we'll actually see Ep. 7 in 2015. Seems like an awful lot of work compressed into a VERY short amount of time. I gotta believe Abrams will push hard for 2016, in an effort to make sure this is done right, and I applaud him for doing so. He won't take a half-assed approach to this, even if (when) people disagree with his execution of the film.


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 1:11 pm
 
Bush Pilot
User avatar

Join: March 23rd 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 1483
Unless it's all being done in Singapore. :wowowow:


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 2:37 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 2nd 2010 7:40 am
Posts: 632
Bandersnatch wrote:
The hard to please fans will never be happy, so fuck 'em. :whatevaho:


That's what Abrams needs to know.


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 3:30 pm
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
And hopefully he'll have the sense to stay away from the IMDB message boards. I made the mistake of visiting there this weekend. Wow, what a bunch of whack jobs. :o


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 3:37 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 2nd 2010 7:40 am
Posts: 632
Bandersnatch wrote:
And hopefully he'll have the sense to stay away from the IMDB message boards. I made the mistake of visiting there this weekend. Wow, what a bunch of whack jobs. :o


I just wish that he treats the prequel and original trilogies as equals.


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 3:45 pm
 

Join: January 11th 2011 10:46 am
Posts: 252
Alexrd wrote:
Bandersnatch wrote:
The hard to please fans will never be happy, so fuck 'em. :whatevaho:


That's what Abrams needs to know.



Based on how terribly concerned he was about catering to the batshit insane fans notion of the universe for ST 2009? Yeah, I think he knows :)


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 4:37 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 26th 2005 11:20 am
Posts: 1224
Alexrd wrote:
I just wish that he treats the prequel and original trilogies as equals.


Hear, hear!


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 5:00 pm
 
Bush Pilot
User avatar

Join: March 23rd 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 1483
See, I'm hoping Abrams appeals to his own nostalgia and understanding of what he took away from the movies growing up. He's really a superfan in addition to being a good filmmaker, which is why I'm so excited and relieved he took the job. He's shown he understands the Hero's Journey, the thematic elements that will be important.

One of my biggest wishes would be to see the Jedi return to the samurai/warrior monk archetype rather than the trigger-happy soldiers in Episodes I, II and III. A little self-restraint would go a long way in showing how powerful they were.


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 5:37 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 2nd 2010 7:40 am
Posts: 632
Topeka wrote:
One of my biggest wishes would be to see the Jedi return to the samurai/warrior monk archetype


Indeed. I haven't seen that since 2005. ;)


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 5:44 pm
 
Bush Pilot
User avatar

Join: March 23rd 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 1483
Nope. They were action stars in the prequels. There wasn't an ounce of Wise in any of 'em.


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 5:45 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 2nd 2010 7:40 am
Posts: 632
Topeka wrote:
Nope. They were action stars in the prequels. There wasn't an ounce of Wise in any of 'em.


Nope, wrong again.


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 5:46 pm
 
Bush Pilot
User avatar

Join: March 23rd 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 1483
Take it to :gb2tfn: where you can argue sentiment all day long.

Judging from your responses here I'm guessing that you're on the younger end of the spectrum. You grew up with the prequels and they're "your" trilogy. I get that and it's cool, man. While I'm all for defending Lucas' talent as a filmmaker and his ability to make his movies however the fuck he wants, I'm not a prequel apologist. So comments like ..."prequel and original trilogies are equals..." stir the pot because they're really not. They both contribute to the same opus but they're quite different on so, so many levels. And that's been debated and argued over for so long, I'm just not getting into it.

Basically where I'm ending at is, from looking at Abrams' body of work, I'm inclined to say he's very likely to create something that feels akin to the classic movies that he and I have loved since childhood. Of course they'll be shiny and "perfect" and fully embrace modern filmmaking but will do so with a little more sensibility about them.

My kids aren't old enough to give me the kind of feedback I want but I'd hazard a guess they will gravitate to the flashier, newer movies. Dammit, in 2005 I didn't have kids. Eight years have gone by fast, now I feel old and I've typed far too long a response to alexrd.


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 7:00 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
Abrams wrote:
I want to make sure the story is something that touches people.

I think that the above statement signifies a larger view for Abrams. He hopes to satisfy the ardent “fan base,” but is primarily looking to connect with a broader audience. He wants to reproduce the same feeling he had when he saw Star Wars for the first time.

Regarding PT Jedi, the sagacious stuff is there, but in smaller bites. For the most part, Lucas got to the meat of the Force philosophy with the OT. So, he may have felt it was unnecessary to go back to that well in large measure with the PT.

As of yet, we don’t know the role of The Force in the films. After the battle of Endor, it's possible that The Force may have become defunct (thanks to the actions of the Chosen One). In turn, the story would lend itself to a whole lot of philosophizing about how to reinterpret and revive it.

Topeka wrote:
... trigger-happy soldiers in Episodes I, II and III. A little self-restraint would go a long way in showing how powerful they were.

I guess you don’t want Nick Gillard back as stunt coordinator?


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 7:19 pm
 
Bush Pilot
User avatar

Join: March 23rd 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 1483
E chu ta, not only how they were basically action fodder but how they were portrayed as a whole. I'll amend "all of them" to mention Qui-Gon. He was fleshed out a little bit more. He had some secrets, knew a little bit more than everyone else, had an attitude. Mace Windu and the rest... completely one dimensional.


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 7:31 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 2nd 2010 7:40 am
Posts: 632
Topeka wrote:
Judging from your responses here I'm guessing that you're on the younger end of the spectrum. You grew up with the prequels and they're "your" trilogy. I get that and it's cool, man.

Topeka wrote:
While I'm all for defending Lucas' talent as a filmmaker and his ability to make his movies however the fuck he wants, I'm not a prequel apologist. So comments like ..."prequel and original trilogies are equals..." stir the pot because they're really not.

Topeka wrote:
Basically where I'm ending at is, from looking at Abrams' body of work, I'm inclined to say he's very likely to create something that feels akin to the classic movies that he and I have loved since childhood. Of course they'll be shiny and "perfect" and fully embrace modern filmmaking but will do so with a little more sensibility about them.

Topeka wrote:
My kids aren't old enough to give me the kind of feedback I want but I'd hazard a guess they will gravitate to the flashier, newer movies.


Wrong, again. I'm not sure how you got that from my responses. Do you think only younger people enjoy the prequels? Or only those who grew up with it? I didn't say they were equals. I said that I hope he treats them equally.

See, I don't want a copy of the OT. We don't need the hero's journey all over again. We need something different. The way the PT was different when compared to the PT.

And there wouldn't be anything wrong with that.


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 8:20 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 26th 2005 11:20 am
Posts: 1224
Regarding the notion of Abrams treating the two trilogies as equals, I take that as expecting nods and references to all six films which will contribute to a very satisfying sense of cohesion and comprehensiveness. But more than clever visual or aural gags, I'm interested in what GL has often referred to as an almost musical type of storytelling with repeating motifs and themes.

Topeka wrote:
One of my biggest wishes would be to see the Jedi return to the samurai/warrior monk archetype rather than the trigger-happy soldiers in Episodes I, II and III. A little self-restraint would go a long way in showing how powerful they were.


Topeka wrote:
Nope. They were action stars in the prequels. There wasn't an ounce of Wise in any of 'em.


"Wars not make one great." It's not a matter of lack of restraint in portraying Jedi this way. They're portrayed in this manner (maybe "battle-hardened?") to underline a kind of contradiction, disharmony or corruption in the Order, especially once the Clone Wars begin. But to tie this into this topic, it makes sense we'll see Jedi in a more enlightened state.


Post Posted: January 28th 2013 10:20 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
E CHU TA! -

I think Nick finally got lightsaber fights right by the time Episode III came around, but a lot of the fighting is still overly choreographed. I don't feel as though Abrams is going to want a "cartoony" duel in his movie.


Post Posted: January 29th 2013 8:27 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
I suppose; but the platform fight in Star Trek had its "cartoony" moments:



Post Posted: January 30th 2013 12:08 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
Except for the spin jump attack that looks like a videogame move, the platform action is pretty organic. Far cry from the entertaining but overly choreographed Obi-wan v Maul battle or any PT lightsaber battle. The Obi-wan v Anakin fight starts to look real good around the time they jump on the pipes and when they're on the bridge that the lava ends up burning through.



I mean, look at this. It's dance class. Very awkward non-organic fighting for at least the first 3 sets, especially the scene where they use force push against each other.


Post Posted: January 30th 2013 10:58 am
 
User avatar

Join: February 22nd 2004 1:16 pm
Posts: 630
Kennedy talks about signing JJ:

Quote:
In November, a journalist asked J.J. Abrams what seemed like an obvious question: Was he interested in directing the next Star Wars movie? Disney had just paid a whopping $4.05 billion to acquire George Lucas' iconic Lucasfilm and had stated its intention to turn out new Star Wars films every two to three years beginning in 2015. The prolific Abrams, who had sparked the flagging Star Trek series in 2009, seemed a natural fit. But he quickly shot the idea down. While Star Wars was "the first movie that blew my mind in that way," he said then, he wanted to focus on original material.

Kathleen Kennedy, the 59-year-old producer who in June had been placed atop the Lucas empire, was not so easily deterred. The Lucasfilm job was just the latest beat in a remarkable 35-year career replete with hits from filmmakers as diverse as Clint Eastwood (The Bridges of Madison County), Robert Zemeckis (Back to the Future), David Fincher (The Curious Case of Benjamin Button) and, above all, Steven Spielberg -- from 1982's E.T. The Extra Terrestrial to his current Oscar contender, Lincoln.

Kennedy already had called Beth Swofford, Abrams' CAA agent, and been told Abrams was too deeply engaged in the next Star Trek movie and other obligations at Paramount -- not to mention innumerable television projects -- to consider the job. Nonetheless, Abrams agreed to meet with Kennedy on Dec. 14 at his Bad Robot offices in Santa Monica. Famously plain-spoken, she summarizes her pitch like this: "Please do Star Wars." And she had cards to play. Not only was Oscar winner Michael Arndt (Little Miss Sunshine, Toy Story 3) writing the script, but Lawrence Kasdan, who wrote 1980's The Empire Strikes Back and 1983's Return of the Jedi, was on board to consult. Abrams "was flipping out when he found out that Michael and Larry were on the movie already," says Kennedy.

Abrams tells THR, "I learned firsthand how incredible and persuasive she is." Some -- but not all -- of his reservations were dispelled. "The thing about any pre-existing franchise -- I'd sort of done that," he says. "But when I met with Kathy, it was suddenly very tantalizing."

Kennedy, Abrams and the writers met secretly for about three hours Dec. 19, and "J.J. was just on the ceiling when I walked out the door," she recalls. But still, she says, Abrams had "very genuine concerns" about his obligations elsewhere and the impact on his wife and three kids, given the likelihood that the film would not be shot in Los Angeles. And then there was the unique nature of the franchise. "If there was any pause on J.J.'s part, it was the same pause everybody has -- including myself -- stepping into this," she says. "Which is, it's daunting."

Indeed, the six Star Wars films have grossed more than $4.3 billion at the worldwide box office and spawned an empire that includes TV spinoffs like The Clone Wars, books, theme park rides and, of course, merchandise sales. Disney has said Lucasfilm generated about $215 million in licensing revenue in 2012 without having released a Star Wars-related movie in five years. Managed correctly, Star Wars by far is the most valuable franchise in Hollywood, making Kennedy -- its new steward -- one of the most powerful figures in entertainment.


Also confirms that the 2015 date is not set in stone:

Quote:
She is less clear that the first film in the new trilogy will be ready by 2015. "Our goal is to move as quickly as we can, and we'll see what happens," says Kennedy. "The timetable we care about is getting the story."


The Hollywood Reporter


Post Posted: January 30th 2013 1:33 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
What's been described here is that Lawrence Kasdan isn't necessarily writing any Star Wars movie and that he'll just be "one of the guys" in the room when developing the movie. I guess that's cool too. He's always been great with dialogue.

As far as the release date, I still think it's very doable. The key is when they start production - if they get to production by the summer, the film is on track.


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  




millenniumfalcon.com©
phpBB©