http://youtu.be/MokNvbiRqCM?hd=1

[align=center][flash width=645 height=385]http://www.youtube.com/v/MokNvbiRqCM&hd=1[/flash][/align]

Just in case you did not get a link from your favorite epiclulzmeme.org site or today's version of AOL/geocities/angelfire known as social networking. Released just past Friday by Kim Dotcom himself who also handled vocals.

The man is a fallen hero.

Topeka, that's gotta be one of the best avatar-post combos i've seen! They line-up perfectly! LMFAO!

i love that the first thing he does is grab his shirt to cover his gut, to avoid embarrassment

He got a sister??

Question, in all sincerity, as a user who has enjoyed all the MF.com has had to offer over the years and as someone who has written a book and is trying to get it published (i.e. financially compensated for the effort), what is a creative artist supposed to do in an age of free file sharing? I'm all for free speech and innovation - in sharing what we like and allowing people to sample products before buying (i.e. sampling a new film before going to the theater and purchasing tickets - and beverages and snacks; buying home viewing options - Blu-Ray, Netflix, iTunes download, etc.). What's the balance? How do we safeguard an individual's right to sharing files with the right of an owner of Intellectual Property to be compensated for their work?

Note: I'm not saying already proposed laws are the answer - they aren't.