bearvomit wrote:
well it got horrible reviews. anyone here see it? apparently, the leaked pic of the werewolf from earlier was a studio fake. they should've used IT instead of the child molesting preacher and two-headed dog!

Saw it and had very mixed feelings about it.
Walking out of the theater, I was in complete shock about how underwhelming the horror/thriller aspect of it was. That part of the film truly did not stand up to the standard Carter set. There was no strong antagonist and we never really learn the bad guys' motives - or we do, but the story is largely left untold, the women who were being taken were not developed and we had no strong attachment to them, the new FBI characters were pretty flat and 2D. Truly, I was in shock - having just rewatched the first 5 seasons of X-Files, I can say that for them (Carter/Spotnitz) to make these kind of fundamental mistakes is incredibly rare. Normally, they are pro's when it comes to this stuff - and they churned out standalone episodes that would have been great on the big screen and made truly great films (Clyde Bruckman, Beyond the Sea, Corpohages, Bad Blood, etc., etc)
However, on the plus side, as a character drama, it was quite good - and it raised interesting and complicated questions about religion, science, faith and tied them back to the characters. They did Mulder and Scully justice - and didn't just bring them back for shyts and gigs - they advanced the characters and really treated them in a satisfying manner.
Honestly, if they had just spent another ten minutes developing the thriller aspect, it would've been a really great film. Or if they had spent ten less minutes on the thriller plot, and just acknowledged that the horror backdrop was just a vehicle for a strong character drama with well-developed themes, it would've been a really great film. As it is, its film thats both plodding and unremarkable and thought-provoking and moving.
Bottom Line: If you're an X-Files fan, see it. If not, probably don't bother.