This was posted on another message board that I go to. It's been a while since we've heard anything about the RIAA, however you guys aint gonna believe this shit.

Take a look here

Talk about a new fucking new low for the RIAA. Going after that family who doesn't even own a computer? Why didn't they go after the tendants that were living their previously instead of a defensless family?

I really hope the judge throws this idiotic case out the fucking window. It shows too by this article the RIAA is really deseperate and for all I care they can burn in hell and shove their copyrighted music up their ass holes.

There's no article there.

Odd... it was there last night. Looks like the article was deleted. o.O

It basically was saying the RIAA was going after a family who didn't own a computer. The family said the previous people who lived there must have had internet service and a computer.

Here's another intresting article that was posted in February. However the RIAA has been doing this a alot lately. Going after deceased people? I mean come on now!

http://www.cdfreaks.com/news/13029

I really hope the courts just start coming down on the RIAA for stupid shit like this and throw cases out the window.

By the way I thought there was the old saying, "Innocent until proven guilty?". Also too I thought the RIAA really had to have major evidence before issuing a subpenoa(sp?) to 'suspects'?

So why would a woman without a computer, and never having ever used a computer, have a wireless internet router/ internet connection running in her apartment? I notice that the quotes from the womans side dont mention a router, just a computer (or lack of computer), so its hard to know about that. If she never had the router/net connection, then it pretty much just fucks all over the RIAAs case. If she had a router and internet connection, then I dont believe that they never had a computer. Of course, I still wouldnt like the lawsuit anyway, but the womans statements arent really trustworthy.


Also, here's a link to the original article:
http://news.mywebpal.com/news_tool_v2.c ... lnews&om=1

Whatever happened to the big argument about copyright vs user privacy? I thought there was a movement to stop the RIAA et al from spying on peoples internet habits?