It is currently May 1st 2025 5:35 pm




  Page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26  Next
Post Posted: May 30th 2005 2:06 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 19th 2005 12:39 pm
Posts: 395
sultan bey wrote:
A little patience and more training and he might have found his answers in the Jedi way.


The Jedi way is not really that relieving. After years of training you let go of things concerning only yourself and your possesive feelings (not that easy to achieve I think), but you still have to be constantly focused on the problems of all other people, no matter, what their faults are and be compassionate and make helping them your ultimate purpose, knowing that you can only help a few. And you always do what you must.

I don't think Obi-Wan felt that great during the 20 years between episodes III and IV, even if he found his answers to things that happened.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 2:53 pm
 
User avatar

Join: December 1st 2004 9:42 pm
Posts: 433
Ternian wrote:

Why does Palpatine need to learn it if he already knows it?

He doesn't know it, chief, he was lying to Anakin. Anakin believed it. He also believes that he and Palpy will together achieve the ability to save her.

Ternian wrote:
No, he doesn't....its just before.


PALPATINE: You are fulfilling your destin, Anakin. Become my apprentice. Learn to use the dark side of the Force.

ANAKIN: I will do whatever you ask.

PALPATINE: Good.

ANAKIN: Just help me save Padme's life. I can't live without her. I won't let her die. I want the power to stop death.

PALPATINE: To cheat death is a power only one has achieved, but if we work together, I know we can discover the secret.

ANAKIN kneels before PALPATINE.

ANAKIN: I pledge myself to your teachings. To the ways of the Sith.

If we are being total assholes caught up in semantics than I guess you're right...but I'm pretty sure "I will do whatever you ask" is a pledge. I think it's implied oral consent, perhaps just not expressed written.

Ternian wrote:
Why wouldn't he hang out with Yoda? No one knows what he did to Mace and he did with the Tuskens - killed them and went about his business like it never happened.

Palpatine does. Is Palpatine just going to let him leave? Furthermore, I'm pretty sure Yoda senses it. It's quite clear from very early on he knows Anakin has turned to the dark side.


Ternian wrote:
You have no conception of what the Dark Side is about...but thats not your fault.

You don't get to decide what the Dark Side is about, GL does. Live with it. Your posts get more bitter and nitpicky everyday.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 2:55 pm
 

Join: April 28th 2005 2:18 am
Posts: 154
Location: Dallas
Ascovel.. the jedi way maybe is not so easy, but it beats living out life as a suited up sith who lost all that mattered. And now serves a bastard like Sidious.

All I'm saying is a little more patience and he might have achieved what he hoped for in the jedi way. He took the short cut and got burned.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 3:00 pm
 
User avatar

Join: December 1st 2004 9:42 pm
Posts: 433
sultan bey wrote:
Ascovel.. the jedi way maybe is not so easy, but it beats living out life as a suited up sith who lost all that mattered. And now serves a bastard like Sidious.

All I'm saying is a little more patience and he might have achieved what he hoped for in the jedi way. He took the short cut and got burned.


That's true, but it's not bad writing, like Ternian would have you think. It's called Tragedy. Think Romeo and Juliet, or Macbeth. Think of the number of coincidental things that occur which lead to the downfall. Good examples is the prophecies in Macbeth, and how if he weren't a pride filled motherfucker, he could've seen it all coming. That's what makes tragedy tragic, it was both extremely preventable and extremely inevitable.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 3:23 pm
 

Join: August 6th 2004 6:29 am
Posts: 857
Ascovel wrote:
Qui-Gon is out of place here. I think Palpatine can only be refering to Plegieus and there's nothing more to it.


Lucas gives us Anakin wanting to know how to prevent death, and Palpatine teasing him with the knowledge. Then it turns out Palpatine doesn't know the secret, which makes it pretty likely that Plagueis didn't know either ("he taught his apprentice everything he knew"? Guess not) -- but clearly Palpatine still wants to learn it. If there's "only one" who has learned to do this, then who else is there? The person we're told about later in the movie, that's who.

I guess you can interpret this however you like. I think it's funny, though, that you're willing to accept that Palpatine lied about being able to teach Anakin the power, but not about Plagueis having it in the first place.

"Have you ever heard the tragedy of Darth Plagueis the Wise? I thought not..." ...because I just now made it up.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 3:36 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 22nd 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1493
Location: Deep Space Nine
Someone did achieve it, or Sidious wouldn't express a want to learn the ability working together with Anakin...I know Sidious lies a lot, but if he'd just said they could cheat death by working together and hadn't mentioned that someone had actually achieved it, I wouldn't argue it was Qui-Gon he was talking about. But clearly, it wasn't Plagueis that discovered the secret. So that's what left Qui-Gon in my mind.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 4:01 pm
 

Join: July 30th 2004 11:55 am
Posts: 300
Hmmm, obviously I can't say for certain that you're wrong but it sounds like a bit of a stretch to me. I can't see how Palpatine could possibly know what would be going on with Qui-Gon. Also, McDiarmid's acting in the Plagueis story clearly implies that he was real - whether he really discovered such powers though is unknown. But the way he relishes the killing of Plagueis (something which was not for Anakin's benefit) suggests the story was meant to be true.

There's nothing to connect Palpatine and Qui-Gon. Qui-Gon even being mentioned in the film feels like an afterthought simply to quieten the people asking constantly about disappearing Jedi.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 4:34 pm
 
User avatar

Join: June 20th 2004 7:19 pm
Posts: 330
But Plagueis never "cheated death" (afterlife). Qui-Gon did. So Palpatine could very well be chasing what Qui-Gon somehow achieved, as Krispies has put foward.

Of course, in the novel Palpatine says "The ability to cheat death was something only my MASTER ever achieved." (Palpatine tells Anakin in the novel that Plagueis was his master). So judging from the book, he might be referring to Plagueis in the movie as well.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 4:57 pm
 
User avatar

Join: December 1st 2004 9:42 pm
Posts: 433
Hey, how come I can't post a new topic for some reason right now. I wanted to start one on questions such as these, discussion Q's you might say about the film, free of questions of its quality, just merely a conversation on questions about the characters and motivations and such.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 4:58 pm
 
Site Admin
User avatar

Join: May 25th 1977 7:00 am
Posts: 1669
Demodex wrote:
Ah, so it was a lie that Plagueis was killed in his sleep then?


Do you need fucking everything spelled out for you? :whatevaho:

Plagueis did cheat death for those around him - just not himself. What's so hard to understand about this..? Palpatine even specifically states this in the Opera scene. His apprentice killed him in his sleep - this does not imply Plagueis cheated death and somehow survived.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 5:27 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 22nd 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1493
Location: Deep Space Nine
The OS needs to update the databank with something on all of this. I'm sure they will.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 5:55 pm
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
The midichlorians taught him.

Or maybe he was secretly teaching himself that little trick the whole time?


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 6:16 pm
 
User avatar

Join: May 9th 2005 8:12 am
Posts: 39
Juan Claws wrote:
By the way, if Obi Wan learnt the process to become a visible spirit after the duel w/Anakin, How come Anakin becomes a spirit in ROTS?
Where did he learn that?
Was stumbled upon. His love for Luke at those dying moments allowed him to become one with the force.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 6:39 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 22nd 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1493
Location: Deep Space Nine
InsaneSith wrote:
Juan Claws wrote:
By the way, if Obi Wan learnt the process to become a visible spirit after the duel w/Anakin, How come Anakin becomes a spirit in ROTS?
Where did he learn that?
Was stumbled upon. His love for Luke at those dying moments allowed him to become one with the force.


Thank you. I'm sick of people calling this a plothole. It's the whole point of the end of ROTJ...love is what brings Anakin back.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 7:12 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 19th 2005 12:39 pm
Posts: 395
Ayatollah Krispies wrote:
I guess you can interpret this however you like. I think it's funny, though, that you're willing to accept that Palpatine lied about being able to teach Anakin the power, but not about Plagueis having it in the first place.


It's you, who assume that Palpatine ever says anything true (about there being one person able to cheat death). I've only said Palpatine must be refering to Plagueis, never said if I think he is a real person or fictional character.
However, I don't think Palpatine just invented the whole story and Plegueis. Where'd be the fun in that? It's more interesting to play with half-truths and points of view.

Ayatollah Krispies wrote:
Then it turns out Palpatine doesn't know the secret, which makes it pretty likely that Plagueis didn't know either ("he taught his apprentice everything he knew"? Guess not)


Palpatine clearly emphasizes both that Plagueis ("the Wise") became "so wise" and that he became "so powerful", as though these were two separate qualities. Makes you wonder, why his apprentice had to kill him in his sleep, having the same knowledge, and why Plegueis never saw it coming, doesn't it? Also the story somehow isn't called "The tragedy of man who could keep people from dying", so there had to be something special about Plegueis that his apprentice lacked.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 7:40 pm
 

Join: April 28th 2005 2:18 am
Posts: 154
Location: Dallas
Every word that comes outta Sidious mouth is suspect. He takes a little truth and twists it to his benefit... just like Dooku does to Obi-Wan while holding him captive on Geonosis.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 8:44 pm
 

Join: August 6th 2004 6:29 am
Posts: 857
Dogg Thang wrote:
I can't see how Palpatine could possibly know what would be going on with Qui-Gon.


How could he know what Anakin was dreaming about? How could he be on Coruscant and know that Anakin was running into trouble on Mustafar? How could he block the Jedi from knowing what he was up to for over 10 years?

Palpatine's the Sith master, and there's no reason to assume that his connection to the Force is any less than Yoda's.

Wrath Mania wrote:
Of course, in the novel Palpatine says "The ability to cheat death was something only my MASTER ever achieved." (Palpatine tells Anakin in the novel that Plagueis was his master). So judging from the book, he might be referring to Plagueis in the movie as well.


But then if you're going to start quoting the book, you also have to deal with what Qui-Gon says about eternal life being "the ultimate goal of the Sith, yet they can never achieve it."

SI wrote:
Demodex wrote:
Ah, so it was a lie that Plagueis was killed in his sleep then?


Do you need fucking everything spelled out for you? :whatevaho:

Plagueis did cheat death for those around him - just not himself.


Says who? A liar? Who did Plagueis save from death?

If Palpatine is only telling Anakin exactly what he wants to hear, why is it so hard to accept that everything he says about Plagueis is a lie? Especially when he leads into the story by confirming that Anakin has never heard of Plagueis before?

Ascovel wrote:
Palpatine clearly emphasizes both that Plagueis ("the Wise") became "so wise" and that he became "so powerful", as though these were two separate qualities...Also the story somehow isn't called "The tragedy of man who could keep people from dying", so there had to be something special about Plegueis that his apprentice lacked.


Sure, as long as you buy into everything that Palpatine says. Again: sort of funny that with no evidence whatsoever to support, you choose to believe that only some of what he says is false, while the rest of it is true.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 9:09 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 19th 2005 12:39 pm
Posts: 395
Ayatollah Krispies wrote:
Sure, as long as you buy into everything that Palpatine says. Again: sort of funny that with no evidence whatsoever to support, you choose to believe that only some of what he says is false, while the rest of it is true.


I never said I believe in any specific part of Palpatine's story, I'm just trying to point out that the things he says do not contradict themselves in such a way, that you have to put Qui-Gon in there to sort them out. I prefer to stick to more obvious explenations, especially if they make more sense.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 9:32 pm
 
Site Admin
User avatar

Join: May 25th 1977 7:00 am
Posts: 1669
Quote:
Says who? A liar? Who did Plagueis save from death?

If Palpatine is only telling Anakin exactly what he wants to hear, why is it so hard to accept that everything he says about Plagueis is a lie? Especially when he leads into the story by confirming that Anakin has never heard of Plagueis before?


Can we try and keep in context with the story here. Your argument is ridiculous - I expect more from you... :monocle:

Are you suggesting Sidious made up that whole Plageuis story just to lure Anakin...? The whole point of that conversation was to set up that Sidious deceived his Master, gained with it all the knowledge he possessed, and he even gloated about it whilst reflecting on it.

Just because Sidious twists his words to his advantage doesn't mean everything he says is bullshit.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 9:46 pm
 

Join: August 6th 2004 6:29 am
Posts: 857
Ascovel wrote:
I never said I believe in any specific part of Palpatine's story, I'm just trying to point out that the things he says do not contradict themselves in such a way, that you have to put Qui-Gon in there to sort them out. I prefer to stick to more obvious explenations, especially if they make more sense.


I don't know if you're reading too much into what I'm saying or whatever -- but I'm not saying putting Qui-Gon in there "sorts anything out."

It most definitely is not made obvious. However, looking back on the first 5 episodes, the single biggest mystery that has never been even remotely explained has been the question of how Jedi remain alive within the Force. Then we get to ROTS, and we have both the Sith Master and the Jedi Master discussing this process. I don't think these things are in there by accident, and I don't think they're meant to be kept separate. We know Qui-Gon did it. We don't know anything about Plagueis except what Palpatine says, and at least part of that is a lie intended to persuade Anakin to join him.

Everyone keeps telling me that this idea makes no sense. But if, as the argument goes, Plagueis really did know the secret, what sense does it make for Sidious to have killed him before learning it?


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 9:52 pm
 

Join: August 6th 2004 6:29 am
Posts: 857
SI wrote:
Are you suggesting Sidious made up that whole Plageuis story just to lure Anakin...? The whole point of that conversation was to set up that Sidious deceived his Master, gained with it all the knowledge he possessed, and he even gloated about it whilst reflecting on it.


No, the whole point of that conversation was to get Anakin to believe that the Sith, unlike the Jedi, have both the will and the way to save Padme.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 10:16 pm
 

Join: April 28th 2005 2:18 am
Posts: 154
Location: Dallas
Agent Smith wrote:
I am having a little trouble with Padme's death

I just think the "will" or "broken heart" was rather weak and a copout. Now maybe had she had something physical (like Anakin's choke having killed her or hurt her) or complications in the pregnancy.


Smith... maybe the late great Hank Williams can put it in perspective for you...

"Life sometimes can be so cruel that a heart will pray for death"


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 10:33 pm
 

Join: February 16th 2005 5:16 pm
Posts: 62
Location: Los Angeles, CA
The issue of whether or not Qui-Gon was who Sidious was referring to does have merit. I saw the film again today and specifically watched the knighting scene for any clues: When Sidious says to Anakin: "To cheat death is a power only one has achieved...", the moment when he says the words, "only one has achieved, Sidious definitely looks away from Anakin as if he's searching for the truth or twisting the truth to serve his purpose.

And I also agree, if you take into acoount Sidious' plan throughout the three films and how he's shrouded everything from the Jedi and the Republic, there's more than enough evidence to suggest that Sidious is just as in tune with the Force (all aspects of it) like Yoda is. It's no accident that they face each other at the end of this film. It's clear that these two guys are the most powerful when it comes to the Force.

I do believe Palpatine is referring to Qui-Gon and not Plagieus because if you look at it in the context of the story, Yoda's words to Obi-Wan at the end of this film are a clear answer and revelation to this scene. It answers Sidious' words to Anakin. And it allows for the Qui-Gon scene to be cut.

This theory isn't s farfetched as some make it out to be.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 11:26 pm
 
User avatar

Join: June 20th 2004 7:19 pm
Posts: 330
According to Qui-Gon in the cut scene, it was achieved by a Shaman of the Whills.

Sidious could easily have been referring to him.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 11:29 pm
 

Join: August 6th 2004 6:29 am
Posts: 857
Agent Smith wrote:
I just think the "will" or "broken heart" was rather weak and a copout. Now maybe had she had something physical (like Anakin's choke having killed her or hurt her) or complications in the pregnancy.


I think this is another one of those things that's up to the viewer to interpret, and I think the bit of Obi-Wan checking her pulse (on Mustafar), and then standing up without any real indication one way or the other, helps to keep it vague. I happen to think she was already dead, but the twins kept her alive.

Because they have the power to stop people from dying. :)


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 11:39 pm
 

Join: August 6th 2004 6:29 am
Posts: 857
Wrath Mania wrote:
According to Qui-Gon in the cut scene, it was achieved by a Shaman of the Whills.

Sidious could easily have been referring to him.


And yet another interpretation is that Sidious does know the secret. But he just doesn't want Anakin to kill him upon learning it, as he did his own master. So he keeps the carrot dangling.

This would also explain why the Qui-Gon lines were cut, given that those argue that the Sith can't learn the secret.

Although I think the real reason the Qui-Gon lines were cut were because Liam Neeson opted against saying them...


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 11:44 pm
 
User avatar

Join: June 20th 2004 7:19 pm
Posts: 330
So do I, and I don't understand why everyone dismisses the report that he refused to do them.

Yes, maybe Plagueis DID teach Sidious the power... but in this case, it was only prolonging life (which would also explain Sidious' appearance, I suppose). It wasn't truly cheating death, just prolonging the inevitable.

And of course, he doesn't want to teach Anakin because naturally he'd try to pull on Sidious what Sidious pulled on Plagueis.

It's only natural of the Sith to use their power to deny the circle of life, I would suppose.


Post Posted: May 30th 2005 11:48 pm
 

Join: August 6th 2004 6:29 am
Posts: 857
Wrath Mania wrote:
So do I, and I don't understand why everyone dismisses the report that he refused to do them.


Yeah, I can't see Lucas paying him, going to the trouble of recording the lines and then cutting them out.

Though FWIW, whoever does Qui-Gon's voice in the Galactic Battlegrounds game is a pretty close match. Certainly closer than whoever did the "NOOOOOOOO" in AOTC.


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 1:45 am
 
User avatar

Join: April 24th 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 184
Location: Hell
i remember hearing the "nooooo!" was reused from tpm


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 2:36 am
 

Join: July 30th 2004 11:55 am
Posts: 300
I suppose it's possible. The drawn out 'n' very much suggested it had been timestretched.


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 2:37 am
 
Site Admin
User avatar

Join: May 25th 1977 7:00 am
Posts: 1669
you're thinking of "Anakin, Anakin" which was reused from TPM.


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 3:32 am
 

Join: September 16th 2004 5:12 pm
Posts: 318
Yeah, the "Nooooooooo!" from AotC was new and recorded by someone else. Someone who, IMO, sounded nothing like Liam Neeson.

That seems to be the trouble with these prequels. Fucked up sounding, stretched out screams of "Noooooooooooo!" Maybe they shoulda used that one for ROTS Vader instead! ;)


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 3:46 am
 
Site Admin • Ternian@hotmail.com
User avatar

Join: October 31st 2003 7:00 am
Posts: 1452
Quote:
PALPATINE: You are fulfilling your destin, Anakin. Become my apprentice. Learn to use the dark side of the Force.

ANAKIN: I will do whatever you ask.

PALPATINE: Good.

ANAKIN: Just help me save Padme's life. I can't live without her. I won't let her die. I want the power to stop death.

PALPATINE: To cheat death is a power only one has achieved, but if we work together, I know we can discover the secret.

ANAKIN kneels before PALPATINE.

ANAKIN: I pledge myself to your teachings. To the ways of the Sith.

If we are being total assholes caught up in semantics than I guess you're right...but I'm pretty sure "I will do whatever you ask" is a pledge. I think it's implied oral consent, perhaps just not expressed written.


Palpatine states that he knows the power as he is being fried by Mace. Then he says he doesn't. It doesn't make sense. This is what I am trying to explain - it makes no LOGICAL sense for Anakin to join the Palpatine. The whole premise of EpIII is that Anakin joins the darkside to save Padme...so why join with someone who can't help you?

Quote:
Palpatine does. Is Palpatine just going to let him leave? Furthermore, I'm pretty sure Yoda senses it. It's quite clear from very early on he knows Anakin has turned to the dark side.


I was speaking hypothetically if Anakin was to kill Palps on the spot.

Quote:
You don't get to decide what the Dark Side is about, GL does. Live with it. Your posts get more bitter and nitpicky everyday.


Read the annotated screen plays. It explains the darkside.

Quote:
Are you suggesting Sidious made up that whole Plageuis story just to lure Anakin...? The whole point of that conversation was to set up that Sidious deceived his Master, gained with it all the knowledge he possessed, and he even gloated about it whilst reflecting on it.


This is the issue. If he doesn't know the secret and is relying on Anakin to help him, then he is NOT DP's apprentice.


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 3:59 am
 
User avatar

Join: April 24th 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 184
Location: Hell
heres somthing new i just thought of, uh do ya think Sids somehow caused the dreams Anakin had? If Padme dies of a broken heart then she wouldn't have died if he didn't turn, meaning she wouldn't die if he didn't have the dreams in the first place, why would he dream about somthing that wouldn't happen if he did not dream about it?

he did tell sids about the dreams of his mother, and sids did know he was dreaming about Padme.


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 4:07 am
 
Site Admin • Ternian@hotmail.com
User avatar

Join: October 31st 2003 7:00 am
Posts: 1452
Padme's death was totally against her character. I don't really understand her motive for ceasing her will to live...


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 4:21 am
 

Join: July 30th 2004 11:55 am
Posts: 300
Yeah I don't get it either. On top of the fact that it's pretty damn difficult just to will yourself to death, nothing in the movies so far suggests she would just give up like that.


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 4:34 am
 

Join: May 3rd 2004 1:09 am
Posts: 386
Location: New Zealand
Especially after she's just given birth to two children...


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 4:53 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 19th 2005 12:39 pm
Posts: 395
All what happened to Anakin and Padme in ROTS just proves love is a sick thing.


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 4:55 am
 
User avatar

Join: April 24th 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 184
Location: Hell
didn't palps saber go out the window during the battle with Mace? how'd he get that sucker back or does he just have backups :o


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 4:59 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 19th 2005 12:39 pm
Posts: 395
Exmortem wrote:
didn't palps saber go out the window during the battle with Mace? how'd he get that sucker back or does he just have backups :o


The one that went out the window was Anakin's backup, Palpatine's own saber is unique, so he is very careful with it.


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 5:01 am
 
User avatar

Join: April 24th 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 184
Location: Hell
i know he was supposed to be using Anakins saber, but thats just lame they should've left it like that or not had his saber going out the window.


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 5:15 am
 

Join: July 30th 2004 11:55 am
Posts: 300
We've seen a lot of lost lightsabers. The concept of having more than one is not new.


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 5:18 am
 
User avatar

Join: April 24th 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 184
Location: Hell
the concept of having your saber go out a window then later having the exact same one later is.


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 6:24 am
 

Join: July 30th 2004 11:55 am
Posts: 300
Where was it established in the movie that it's the same one?


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 8:31 am
 
User avatar

Join: April 30th 2005 9:46 am
Posts: 43
Agent Smith wrote:
Inconsistent Light sabre duels haunt me. This is the breakdown:

We have Obi-Wan killing Maul who pretty much looks like the best swordsman in the whole PT.

In AotC you have Anakin and Obi being owned by Dooku. Then you have Dooku holding his own with Yoda (lightning and all).

Moving to ROTS you have Obi- Wan STILL being owned by Dooku and now Anakin's killing of Dooku made to look way too easy. (Where was the force lightning Dooku?)

Moving along to Mace pretty much owning Palp although he cut thru the other Jedi way way to easy making it look like the leads are the only ones who really know how to fight. Was Palp just toying with Mace?

Then we have Yoda who cant seem to beat Dooku (in AotC) and fares far worse than Windu did aginst Palp. And not to mention he just gives up.

And the worst of all, we have Obi-Wan basically winning the fight aginst the chosen one. He can't beat Dooku or even give a good showing aginst him but he can beat Anakin?

yes we all had our preconcieved notions about the Obi-Ani fight, for meeven as far back as the late 70's. I cant remeber where (think it was Bantha Tracks) but reading a George interview stating that during the big fight Anakin falls into lava. So all these years it was thought by me that it was a hell of a fight but Anakin slipped or lava somehow got on him.

But what we have is Obi flat out beating Anakin (set up by a god awful high ground statement).

Sorry just some unloading............................


i agree with you on most of the things you stated except a few things. Yoda could have beaten Dooku and Count new it. Thats why he high tailed out of there

I really really think Palp was just holding back that whole time

I think imo Anakin could have beaten Obi wan. That duel was cut alot. It seemed to me Anakin was always on the Offensive and Obi wan was always on the defensive trying to get away from Anakin. Anakin over confidence made him lost. Its still weird to me how "I have the high ground" came about. Anankin didn't need to do a super flip right behind obi wan. He could have simple jumped off in front of him.


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 9:32 am
 

Join: January 24th 2004 4:36 am
Posts: 33
Location: Japan
I kind of liked Obi Wan's compassion on that "I have the high ground" line. He just seems to want Anakin to give it all up.

Actually, I thought the whole point of the duel was that Anakin IS the superior swordsman but loses for the very specific reasons that he is too obsessed, reckless and overconfident.

Watch Obi Wan throughout the duel - he is far more aware of the surroundings. He is the one who is always reacting to the environment first: moving to dodge the lava, jumping onto the floating platform etc. Anakin is just totally obsessed with hacking Obi Wan to bits.

Obi Wan is compassionate, thoughtful, and aware right to the end, but Anakin is blinded by his hatred, and lets face it he was never that much of a deep thinker anyway.

Winning and losing is not based on a simple question of whether you are stronger than your opponent. It is the combination of all your skills and weaknesses with respect to those of your opponent.


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 9:55 am
 

Join: September 20th 2004 3:27 pm
Posts: 52
Spike32 wrote:
he couldve.. but anakin is so stupid and overconfident he hasta jump behind him


Yes that jump was very stupid, but Anakin still could've blocked his saber I think, I mean he is the greatest Jedi ever.

Anakin should be grateful that Obiwan ONLY cut his legs and an arm off. While Anakin was in mid-air Mr. Kenobi could've simply given him a force push right into the lava.


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 10:16 am
 
User avatar

Join: April 30th 2005 9:46 am
Posts: 43
Big_Peb wrote:
Spike32 wrote:
he couldve.. but anakin is so stupid and overconfident he hasta jump behind him


Yes that jump was very stupid, but Anakin still could've blocked his saber I think, I mean he is the greatest Jedi ever.

Anakin should be grateful that Obiwan ONLY cut his legs and an arm off. While Anakin was in mid-air Mr. Kenobi could've simply given him a force push right into the lava.


yes the jump was stupid and in a way anakin was showing off. Your right..obi wan could have killed Anakin right then and there. He is lucky he only cut offed his legs and arm. I still dont get the "High ground though" to me it seemed Obi wan Knew what Anakin would do before Anakin thought of it. Or he anticipated that jump and in a sense warned Anakin that he should just give up. Instead he didn't so he made him pay for his overconfidence. Be it as it may, Anakin had a better chance of winning duking it out but he was outsmarted and outthinked.


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 10:27 am
 

Join: September 20th 2004 3:27 pm
Posts: 52
It just meant that he had the highground. Anakin was "going against the grain" so to speak. That fight probably would've turned out a lot different if he jumped on top of Obiwan.

In jumping up towards Obi, Anakin left his whole lower body open. Obi had a variety of options open to him. Either way you try to analyze this scene, Anakin was screwed.


Post Posted: May 31st 2005 10:28 am
 

Join: May 26th 2005 2:43 pm
Posts: 3
I just thought of something. Anakin's argument for killing all the Jedi is that they're evil and he saw them try to assassinate senator Palpatine himself. This is pretty ridiculous to me when you think about it. Anakin told Mace that Palpatine was a Sith Lord. Does he really expect Mace and the others to go in there and not have some sort of duel. Also, Palpatine killed three Jedi before he was killed, so that would seem to make him just as evil.

Another thing. Just after Anakin kills Mace Palpatine says something like "Now the Sith will rule the galaxy once more". So, if the Jedi are evil for wanting to rule the galaxy, then why is Palpatine not?


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Page Previous  1 ... 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26  Next



Jump to:  




millenniumfalcon.com©
phpBB©