It is currently May 1st 2025 5:12 pm




  Page Previous  1, 2
Post Posted: May 4th 2005 3:01 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
I am quite disappointed that scene isn't in the film. It would've been classic, and yes, it would've strung the OT and PT together nicely.

I can hope it's reintegrated into the DVD as long as that asshole Neeson agrees to do the part.


Post Posted: May 4th 2005 3:07 pm
 
Too cool for an avatar.

Join: March 6th 1973 7:12 am
Posts: 489
Location: Dallas, Tx
I just don't see how having the QuiGon dialogue or not changes the film drastically at all.

FYI. line by line deconstructions of posts is really annoying.


Post Posted: May 4th 2005 3:20 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 6th 2005 5:16 pm
Posts: 95
Location: Germany
kale xander wrote:
there are some people that just shouldn't be spoiled because they get attached to things that people better placed than them (ie those actually putting the movie together) decide aren't needed or don't work within the context of the movie. i find it hard to comprehend that some one is going to sit through the movie and when it hits the end be muttering "that sucks... no ghost of qui-gon. worst. edit. ever." GET A GRIP PEOPLE.


Very short answer: ALIENS - DIRECTOR'S CUT = revaluating a movie.

http://www.schnittberichte.com/SBs/28/aliens1.jpg
http://www.schnittberichte.com/SBs/28/aliens2.jpg
http://www.schnittberichte.com/SBs/28/aliens3.jpg
http://www.schnittberichte.com/SBs/28/aliens8.jpg
http://www.schnittberichte.com/SBs/28/aliens11.jpg
http://www.schnittberichte.com/SBs/28/aliens14.jpg

Period.


Post Posted: May 4th 2005 3:33 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 6th 2005 5:16 pm
Posts: 95
Location: Germany
kale xander wrote:
and in what way is episode three NOT a director's cut? there isn't a studio telling Lucas what to cut and how long his movie should be. THIS IS the director's cut and Qui-Gon isn't in it. Jeez.


Fair enough.
On the other hand, don't you think the inclusion of the "Lost Twenty" in AOTC would have been a good idea? It think it would have.


Post Posted: May 4th 2005 3:35 pm
 

Join: March 15th 2005 7:57 pm
Posts: 289
Der Graf wrote:
kale xander wrote:
and in what way is episode three NOT a director's cut? there isn't a studio telling Lucas what to cut and how long his movie should be. THIS IS the director's cut and Qui-Gon isn't in it. Jeez.


Fair enough.
On the other hand, don't you think the inclusion of the "Lost Twenty" in AOTC would have been a good idea? It think it would have.


I think it would have for sure. It would have added to Dooku's character. That stuff is important...certainly more important than an alien saying "jedi poodoo" during a car chase.


Post Posted: May 4th 2005 4:08 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 19th 2005 12:39 pm
Posts: 395
Ziggy wrote:
I just don't see how having the QuiGon dialogue or not changes the film drastically at all.

FYI. line by line deconstructions of posts is really annoying.


It wasn't my purpose to annoy you, I didn't take little bits of your post out of context or argued about every sentence you wrote, that it shows you are totaly wrong or something like that, it just allowed me to write a few direct answers to your points.

But OK, I won't do it again to you.

This cut won't ruin the movie for me, but I think the QuiGon dialogue added a lot to the rest of the film, I already tried to explain why, but you seem to see things a bit differently then me or perheps it's just the fault of my not-so-good english and I can not show my point of view properly.


Post Posted: May 4th 2005 4:17 pm
 
Too cool for an avatar.

Join: March 6th 1973 7:12 am
Posts: 489
Location: Dallas, Tx
I appreciate your point of view, and I do understand wanting to hear QuiGon. It's a neat way to more closely tie TPM back into ROTS.

However, just having Yoda's conversation with ObiWan clearly illustrates that he has been communing with Qui Gon, and either way we get that Qui Gon still exists in the force, and has something to teach them.

Anakin coming back as a force ghost in ROTJ, demonstartes that this is possible through love. So, I don't think the extra dialogue is neccessary.


Post Posted: May 4th 2005 4:46 pm
 

Join: April 11th 2005 9:38 pm
Posts: 106
Der Graf wrote:
Fair enough.
On the other hand, don't you think the inclusion of the "Lost Twenty" in AOTC would have been a good idea? It think it would have.

I'm completely indifferent about the Lost Twenty concept. Who cares? Whether it's mentioned or not does not change Dooku's part in the Clone Wars at all. Who cares that other people have left the Jedi Order or not? In a thousand years, they're bound to lose some.


Post Posted: May 4th 2005 5:01 pm
 
User avatar

Join: July 24th 2004 10:51 pm
Posts: 164
Damn too bad that we won't hear Qui-Gon, at least he's still the reason they learn about the ghost thing.


Post Posted: May 4th 2005 5:06 pm
 

Join: February 16th 2005 5:16 pm
Posts: 62
Location: Los Angeles, CA
In a way, it makes sense to cut the scene because during this time in the filim, it should be about Yoda and Obi-Wan and their plans for the future. Their characters set the events of the Original Trilogy and we should feel that.

Having Obi-Wan's reaction to go by instead of hearing Qui-Gon then seeing Obi-Wan's reaction and question is better suited for the film and the overall story.


Post Posted: May 4th 2005 5:20 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 24th 2005 5:46 pm
Posts: 13
Location: Droid Parts & Technical Group
Just A question......

Am I foolish to think(and hope) that possibly this could
be a scene only in the Digitally Projected version ?

How nice would it be for GL to have a few surprises
for us ? VERY! unlikely? YES!

Though I agree this wont impact the Story Much,
I can say that this being the last movie and all makes
me really anxious for things to be fullfilling.

:heavymetal:


Post Posted: May 4th 2005 11:54 pm
 
I would have liked to have Jinn in a spirit or voice in this movie but as long as they just mention or talk about him is good for me.


  Top
Post Posted: May 5th 2005 3:33 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 3rd 2005 10:48 am
Posts: 4
Location: Montreal
The exclusion of the Qui Gon/Yoda conversation is poor filmmaking in my opinion.

You can't suddenly reintroduce a character in passing who's been absent since The Phantom Menace.

"Obi Wan, in a scene which the audience did not see, I talked to Qui Gon, your old master, the one who died two movies ago, ya know, the dude who the audience no longer remembers?"

*audience is clueless as to why Qui Gon Jinn is being brought back into the fold*

"No, of course we didn't have to show the audience the scene where I talked to the character who they completely forgot about. Who cares if he plays an integral part in the mythology!? So anyways, he told me how to live after death. Pretty cool huh? The audience would probably understand what I was saying better if they had heard the conversation, but meh."



I'm not trying to attack George or anything, but this was one scene which I personally feel was integral to the development and understanding of the Jedi's relationship with the force, and it shouldn't be introduced in a tacked on conversation in passing.


Post Posted: May 5th 2005 6:55 pm
 

Join: April 11th 2005 9:38 pm
Posts: 106
Says you. :whateva:


Post Posted: May 5th 2005 7:45 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 3rd 2005 10:48 am
Posts: 4
Location: Montreal
Well, it would be 'says me' because it's my own personal opinion. You can have your own opinion too, I won't jump down your throat for it.

I just feel that George dropped the ball by not including that scene because I think that it would've added a lot to the Star Wars mythology and to the concept of the living force.


Post Posted: May 6th 2005 12:37 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 9th 2005 2:18 pm
Posts: 78
but i was hoping theyd explain vaders ability to maintain his form


Post Posted: May 6th 2005 3:41 am
 

Join: April 24th 2005 9:49 pm
Posts: 3
it is indeed extremely disappointing qui-gon is not in it at all. so all we get is a few words from qui-gon in ep2 and yoda mentioning it to obi-wan in ep3. how can people not see the problem with yoda suddenly leaning over to obi and saying oh, i have have been gabbing with qui-gon. hopefully it will be put back/in the dvd version of the film.


Post Posted: May 6th 2005 5:05 am
 

Join: March 11th 2005 12:04 am
Posts: 3
Though I think Liam Neeson is AWESOME, I can accept Qui Gon not making a visual appearance as so long as the revelation is executed in a dramatic mysterious way. If so, that mystery will intensify in Obi-Wan's de-materialization in ANH. It will finally, it will intensify the pivotal revalation in his dramatic return in ESB.

I doubt I can ever relive the shock of seeing Obi-wan unexpected appearance in Hoth or Vaders revelation to Luke. But it would still be nice to be shocked once again by the story. Of course reading these spoilers in this here forums does not help that. :)

Of course the sheep in me demands Liam's appearance, but the linear story development side of my head says otherwise.


Post Posted: May 7th 2005 5:06 am
 

Join: April 1st 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 6
Well, from most reports his absence was due to him refusing to do the part. Which is very petty of him if you ask me. The professional thing to do is come in, do the three or four lines, and be an adult about it.


Post Posted: May 7th 2005 5:13 am
 

Join: March 26th 2005 4:34 pm
Posts: 310
Location: Netherlands
so much for the usa today thing :roll:

but I agree, if it was because he refused to do the part, I think that's pretty fucking weak. I also personally think Qui-Gon should've had a bigger role in the PT, I mean it's frickin Liam Neeson we're talking about.

Oh well, lets see how it turns out in the movie first.


Post Posted: May 7th 2005 8:53 am
 

Join: March 29th 2005 6:50 pm
Posts: 111
Location: Stevens Point, WI
I highly doubt that Liam Neeson refused to do the part. You think he just threw up his middle finger at Lucas and walked away? Especially considereing everything he's said in the past--things like his playful "jedi code of honor" quote make me highly doubt that.

The movies out. It's done. It is what Lucas wanted.

But if it's Neeson's fault it couldn't be done, Fuck him. ;)


Post Posted: May 7th 2005 11:33 pm
 

Join: December 29th 2004 5:23 pm
Posts: 19
No QuiGon?

FUCK.


Post Posted: May 7th 2005 11:39 pm
 
sup nigs
User avatar

Join: October 31st 2003 7:00 am
Posts: 168
The real movie will be played in the theaters as a suprise with the inclusion of the scene.


Post Posted: May 7th 2005 11:39 pm
 
User avatar

Join: January 14th 2005 4:42 pm
Posts: 278
no biggie. but this is the one rumour i was kinda hoping would pan out.

does anyone know for sure if neeson passed. maybe i missed it.


Post Posted: May 8th 2005 3:12 am
 
User avatar

Join: August 24th 2004 10:24 pm
Posts: 129
Location: PHX1138
Jotun wrote:
The real movie will be played in the theaters as a suprise with the inclusion of the scene.

I agree. It happens every time. And they only need Liam Neeson for dialogue. His appearance, in the glass (as I've been told), can be put in digitally using old footage of him.


Post Posted: May 8th 2005 3:41 am
 
Massive Sith Interceptor Fan
User avatar

Join: February 14th 2005 4:27 am
Posts: 92
Location: Dathomir
its sad that the scene isnt in the movie.. i would have loved to have seen quigon again.. especialy at the end of such a fantastic and emotional film.

it would have added lots to the already great sounding ending.

and like someone said before.. just the voice would have been ok to be honest.


Post Posted: May 8th 2005 6:08 am
 

Join: March 26th 2005 4:34 pm
Posts: 310
Location: Netherlands
Jotun wrote:
The real movie will be played in the theaters as a suprise with the inclusion of the scene.


for real? So there's still hope?


Post Posted: May 8th 2005 8:47 am
 

Join: December 29th 2004 5:23 pm
Posts: 19
Man, if it's added back in, I will be extremely happy! Qui-Gon's voice and ethereal image, in my opinion, is necessary because he was such a central part of TPM and a much bigger part of the entire story, than I ever imagined. Relegating him to a couple lines of exposition is weak. Especially since no one besides the die-hard fans will remember Qui-Gon Jinn from Sloe Gin Fizz. God I hope he's in there, that would be sweet.

If not...

FUCK!


Post Posted: May 8th 2005 9:14 am
 
User avatar

Join: May 6th 2005 5:55 pm
Posts: 12
Damn, I was looking forward to that the most. Ep's 2 and 3 already feel far removed from Ep 1, and this would have helped string them together.

Plus, it just would have been cool to hear Qui-Gon and Yoda talking to each other again.

I've heard that the cuts of the movie for regular theatres and digital theatres are different in some ways (could just be wild rumours), but if so, maybe Qui-Gon is in one of them. If not, I guess I can wait for the DVD.


Post Posted: May 8th 2005 9:31 am
 

Join: July 27th 2004 6:00 pm
Posts: 39
Remember Darth Maul being cut in half wasn't in the press screenings. So it is possible for Liam to be in the final release.


Post Posted: May 8th 2005 9:32 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 6th 2005 5:16 pm
Posts: 95
Location: Germany
Jotun wrote:
The real movie will be played in the theaters as a suprise with the inclusion of the scene.


Yes! Hopefully!
I always thought that there is the possibillity of the pre-screening version being edited in a slightly different way. If I were Lucas, I'd do that too, in order to surprise the spoiled hardcore internet nerds like us...

So maybe, even Mon Mothma is still in (wasn't she mentioned in the ending credits?) and VERY MAYBE, Lucas exchanged the names of the twins during the birth scene. Maybe in the theatrical version Padme touches and looks at Leia, not Luke. Wouldn't that be a halfway satisfiying explanation of her remembering her mother? ;)

We'll see. Eleven days and counting...


Post Posted: May 8th 2005 10:01 am
 

Join: March 26th 2005 4:34 pm
Posts: 310
Location: Netherlands
leia remembers bail organa's wife. Period.


Post Posted: May 8th 2005 10:25 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 6th 2005 5:16 pm
Posts: 95
Location: Germany
Zéyann wrote:
leia remembers bail organa's wife. Period.


Sorry, mindtricks don't work on me. Only good argumentation.

Bail Organa's wife is not her "real mother". Period. :)


Post Posted: May 8th 2005 10:27 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 19th 2005 12:39 pm
Posts: 395
Zéyann wrote:
leia remembers bail organa's wife. Period.


She's talking about Padme. Luke's question and her response to him don't make sense if you assume she didn't knew she had a surrogate mother. Besides, Lucas has explained his intentions with this piece of dialogue several times and he seemed also a bit embarassed about how he finally "forced" those memories on Leia.


Post Posted: May 8th 2005 1:15 pm
 

Join: December 29th 2004 5:23 pm
Posts: 19
Damnit let's stay on topic please? Obviously, Leia remembers Padme because in the Hexology DVD Ultimate Collection, Lucas will add new lines to ROTJ-

Leia:"..she was beautiful, but sad. I say that because I was shown holopictures by a ghost who was Obi-Wan's master way back in Episode I."
Luke:"Yoda. Ben's master was Yoda!"
Leia:"Who's Yoda? I'm talking about Qui-Gon Jinn."
Luke:"Who the fuck is Qui-Gon Jinn?"


Post Posted: May 8th 2005 1:33 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 3rd 2005 10:48 am
Posts: 4
Location: Montreal
I thought Maul not being cut in half was a CGI error that they corrected?

In any case, there won't be any surprises. What the critics are seeing is what we're going to get, don't set yourselves up for dissapointment.

Qui Gon's not in it. It would've helped the film in my opinion, but there's no use crying over spilt milk.

We should all be anticipating the film regardless.


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Page Previous  1, 2



Jump to:  




millenniumfalcon.com©
phpBB©