It is currently May 1st 2025 11:42 am




  Page 1, 2  Next
Post Posted: April 5th 2005 10:14 am
 
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
User avatar

Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm
Posts: 4265
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/topnews.php?id=9056

Revenge of the Sith Changes
April 5, 2005


Anyone who has followed the Star Wars prequels knows that George Lucas changes his films up to the last possible minute. (Ask anyone who happened to see an accidentally released Episode I print where Darth Maul fell down the shaft in one piece.) Revenge of the Sith is no exception. Changes are still being made, so if you've already spoiled yourself with the comic or novelization, a source lets us know of a few things you'll find different in the film. Highlight to read spoilers!:

During the childbirth, the lower half of Padme's body is now covered by some device (added digitally). Thus the scene is now inconsistent with what you see in the books, older stills etc...

Padme's last words are changed and her funeral is now even longer. There are more mourners (mostly human) and we see that she holds in her hand that wooden thing Anakin gave her in Episode 1.


Check back for more later!


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 10:18 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 14th 2005 11:52 pm
Posts: 26
Interesting I wonder why he would do that.


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 10:19 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
I'm betting Degobah is back in.


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 10:19 am
 
User avatar

Join: February 17th 2005 7:31 am
Posts: 45
dont see the point of the first change... but a longer funeral scene, i can deal with


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 10:21 am
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
"Why would he do this?"

Because he's making a movie.

:whateva:


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 10:28 am
 
User avatar

Join: July 26th 2004 10:45 am
Posts: 37
Location: United Kingdom
Holding the jappor snippet is in the screenplay that was released.


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 10:57 am
 
User avatar

Join: December 28th 2004 11:37 am
Posts: 375
Maybe Natalie didnt shave her legs during the time they filmed that scene.


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 11:52 am
 
User avatar

Join: December 28th 2004 11:37 am
Posts: 375
Hey, if you give enough BJ's then somone is libel to give you what your after.

Do you need cream for your coffee?


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 12:36 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 31st 2003 7:00 am
Posts: 631
Location: Michigan
Maybe these changes are slated for digital prints of the movie, as opposed to prints on film.

Much like Anakin's robotic arm being seen in the digital prints of AOTC.


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 12:48 pm
 

Join: March 15th 2005 7:57 pm
Posts: 289
The padme thing is an interesting change...I wonder what his reasoning is. I personally liked the imagery of her laying dead on the table. I kind of have a hard time imagining those pictures and her having a cg machine covering up half her body. Seems to me like it would lessen the impact.


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 1:05 pm
 
User avatar

Join: February 16th 2005 7:56 pm
Posts: 99
Location: UK
If they're going to change anything, they should cut the whole 'we can't find anything medically wrong with her' deal. That, or add in a reaction line by Ewan saying 'Try looking at her throat, genius.'


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 1:31 pm
 

Join: August 3rd 2004 2:56 pm
Posts: 88
More likely, George would add Obi saying, "Aww.. she died of a broken heart."

It's more gay, therefore more plausible. :)


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 1:36 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 24th 2005 5:31 pm
Posts: 6
Location: USA and Ireland
Woo bring back Dagobah!

*Crosses fingers*


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 2:07 pm
 

Join: February 1st 2005 6:49 pm
Posts: 75
I bet someone else becomes Darth Vader now. Like Mace Windu or Padme.


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 2:44 pm
 

Join: July 25th 2004 10:47 pm
Posts: 401
Wasn't that Darth Maul thing apocryphal?


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 3:25 pm
 
User avatar

Join: December 28th 2004 11:37 am
Posts: 375
No, its more in the vain of the Cubs winning the world series.


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 3:35 pm
 
User avatar

Join: November 2nd 2004 4:38 pm
Posts: 166
Location: Natalie Portman's Bedroom
Quote:
Ask anyone who happened to see an accidentally released Episode I print where Darth Maul fell down the shaft in one piece.


Proof they have no idea what they're talking about.

Maul was ALWAYS meant to fall in two pieces, but some prints went out with unfinished effects.

Retards like them are why some idiots on TFN still swear Maul was meant to live.


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 4:58 pm
 

Join: December 28th 2004 8:25 am
Posts: 6
ManaByte wrote:
Quote:
Ask anyone who happened to see an accidentally released Episode I print where Darth Maul fell down the shaft in one piece.


Proof they have no idea what they're talking about.

Maul was ALWAYS meant to fall in two pieces, but some prints went out with unfinished effects.

Retards like them are why some idiots on TFN still swear Maul was meant to live.


Hey, neither from TFN or this place but the cut where Maul falls
down in one piece is not an unfinished effect. They did that due
to the PG rating because Lucas wasn't sure if cutting him in two
pieces would give the film a PG only.

Again, it is not an unfinished effect, it was an alternative version.


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 5:01 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 19th 2005 6:28 pm
Posts: 59
Location: Shop-Rite
I'm assuming that the device may be some kind of special coffin.


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 5:07 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 19th 2005 6:28 pm
Posts: 59
Location: Shop-Rite
Actually the device is probably there to hide the fact that she isn't pregnant anymore.


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 5:23 pm
 
Charming to the last

Join: January 14th 2005 2:50 am
Posts: 678
darthpsychotic wrote:
http://www.comingsoon.net/news/topnews.php?id=9056
Padme's last words are changed...


So she won't say there is still good in him? That's gone?


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 5:27 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 14th 2005 11:52 pm
Posts: 26
What I ment is why would he change the lines and cover padme. Just seems to take down the intensity in my opinion.


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 5:33 pm
 

Join: March 31st 2005 3:52 pm
Posts: 27
darthpsychotic wrote:
we see that she holds in her hand that wooden thing Anakin gave her in Episode 1.[/i]



What wooden thing?

Was it long and round?

If so, than we now know what she was doing when Anakin was absent, fighting at Outer Rim :mrgreen:


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 5:36 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 19th 2005 6:28 pm
Posts: 59
Location: Shop-Rite
Image


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 6:40 pm
 
User avatar

Join: July 30th 2004 6:19 pm
Posts: 138
Location: Coastal North Carolina
aka the Jappor Snippet that he gave to Padme aboard her starship.


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 7:27 pm
 
User avatar

Join: February 4th 2005 1:36 pm
Posts: 145
Or not...


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 11:14 pm
 

Join: March 7th 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 4
mrnide wrote:
Maybe Padme tells Obi-Wan Anakin has relatives on Tatooine or perhaps Lucas has just lost every nickle and penny in his head and the last 10 minutes of the film is replaced with footage from Return of the Jedi.


Obi-Wan already knows Anakin was from Tatooine since he was stranded there for most TPM and saw him when they picked him up. Not to mention Anakin had already told Obi about his mother in AOTC.


Post Posted: April 5th 2005 11:23 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 24th 2005 12:17 am
Posts: 216
[joke] Maybe Padme tells Obi-Wan Anakin has relatives on Tatooine or perhaps Lucas has just lost every nickle and penny in his head and the last 10 minutes of the film is replaced with footage from Return of the Jedi. [/joke]

I'm pretty sure.


Post Posted: April 6th 2005 12:32 am
 
User avatar

Join: April 5th 2005 1:43 am
Posts: 24
Location: Tavares, Florida
Nah, if Lucas lost all his sense (the nickel-penny reference :mrgreen: ) he'd replace the Kashyyk footage with the Ewok battle!

Anyway, I wouldn't put *too* much stock in comingsoon.net, but the news isn't suprising to me.

And I swear I remember seeing Maul fall down that shaft in one piece when I saw TPM in Daytona.....


Post Posted: April 6th 2005 4:44 am
 

Join: March 31st 2005 3:52 pm
Posts: 27
Quote:
And I swear I remember seeing Maul fall down that shaft in one piece when I saw TPM in Daytona.....


Why is Daytona so different?
Look again...There are 2 pieces, maybe 3 :)


Post Posted: April 6th 2005 5:22 am
 

Join: March 7th 2005 4:07 am
Posts: 44
You most likely did--I remember reading at the time that both versions were released to theaters (most prints had Maul falling in half--some had him just falling) Like a poster stated above, I recall it being a ratings or audience testing maneuver.


Post Posted: April 6th 2005 11:39 am
 

Join: March 11th 2005 8:46 am
Posts: 2
As far as the whole Maul thing goes, I saw TPM the first weekend it was out (like all Star Wars movies) and remember no two pieces. But the next time, I noticed the two halves of his body falling down the pit and I remember thinking, "Hey, I don't remember seeing him in half the first time." I'm extremely critical of movies and pay attention to all aspects of them. I'm quite sure my thoughts do not betray me. :mrgreen: (By the way, I live in Florida and saw TPM in Orlando.)


Post Posted: April 6th 2005 12:13 pm
 
User avatar

Join: February 9th 2005 8:58 pm
Posts: 53
Location: Fort Worth, TX
I remember the two halves...

interesting that they shot it both ways. You'd think Lucas could question the MPAA and say "if we have this guy falling down the shaft in half, will it make it pg13?"


Post Posted: April 6th 2005 12:18 pm
 
User avatar

Join: December 28th 2004 11:37 am
Posts: 375
Since there wasnt much shown in the way of gore, then I assume thats the reason there was no PG-13.


Post Posted: April 6th 2005 12:53 pm
 

Join: March 22nd 2005 5:26 pm
Posts: 8
Location: orlando, florida
i remeber the first time i saw TPM Maul only fell down, but a couple of weeks later he split in 2..i was like whats going on here? i thought i was just crazy, but maybe i am...


Post Posted: April 6th 2005 5:06 pm
 

Join: September 24th 2004 8:54 pm
Posts: 11
I saw it with the one piece and again with the cut in half, and didn't notice the change (I figured lightsaber to the torso meant slice in half). My mom never saw it with the cut in half and it drove her crazy for a long time, especially when she saw the sliced in half print.


Post Posted: April 6th 2005 5:17 pm
 
User avatar

Join: July 24th 2004 10:51 pm
Posts: 164
Wait so they actually released a version where he wasn't cut in half?! I never knew that...


Post Posted: April 6th 2005 5:54 pm
 

Join: September 24th 2004 8:54 pm
Posts: 11
bacta wrote:
DURING THE CHILDBIRTH her body is covered. there is probably no change in those shots we've seen of padme laying out and obi-wan with her. obviously, with all the bad shit already in the film, no one wants to see a bloody birth.

I didn't want to see one, anyway. :mrgreen:


Post Posted: April 6th 2005 6:02 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 19th 2005 6:28 pm
Posts: 59
Location: Shop-Rite
I must be blind; I thought that it read that it was during the funeral scene that something was edited in.

Well, now it makes perfect sense.


Post Posted: April 6th 2005 10:52 pm
 

Join: November 2nd 2004 12:53 am
Posts: 84
bacta wrote:
DURING THE CHILDBIRTH her body is covered. there is probably no change in those shots we've seen of padme laying out and obi-wan with her. obviously, with all the bad shit already in the film, no one wants to see a bloody birth.


Why not? The bitchy sheep always like more blood and violence in the film, and the bitchy sheep always want more Portamn in the film, and I would imagine most especially if the Portman material involves her vagina.. so wouldn't the combination of the two just be the ultimate for them? :monocle:


Post Posted: April 6th 2005 11:13 pm
 

Join: November 2nd 2004 12:53 am
Posts: 84
I'm pretty sure you meant inhumane, but then again you also said cuz and the shift key on your keyboard seems to be broken. BTW, it was a joke.


Post Posted: April 7th 2005 2:35 am
 
User avatar

Join: April 5th 2005 1:43 am
Posts: 24
Location: Tavares, Florida
MediaGuy0979 wrote:
As far as the whole Maul thing goes, I saw TPM the first weekend it was out (like all Star Wars movies) and remember no two pieces. But the next time, I noticed the two halves of his body falling down the pit and I remember thinking, "Hey, I don't remember seeing him in half the first time." I'm extremely critical of movies and pay attention to all aspects of them. I'm quite sure my thoughts do not betray me. :mrgreen: (By the way, I live in Florida and saw TPM in Orlando.)

Exactly. I remember now. I saw TPM first in Daytona on opening night, saw Maul in one piece. Took my wife to see it a week later in The Villages, Maul split in two.

BTW I think the Padme edit has a lot to do with the craziness of ratings. Full-on childbirth would probably raise the movie to pg-13 or some such craziness.


Post Posted: April 7th 2005 5:05 am
 

Join: July 27th 2004 2:20 pm
Posts: 89
Location: Syracuse, NY
About the changes in ROTS... It wouldn't bother me because this is no different from how Luke would have a blue lightsaber in the early previews then have it changed to a green lightsaber for the final cut of Return of the Jedi.

So, Birth Machine or not, It's only gonna take up like 2 minutes of screentime so don't let it ruin your perspective of the entire movie. This is Padme's version of the lightsaber color change, pretty much. So don't worry about it guys, breathe in and out and say to yourself, "It's just a movie, It's just a movie." and accept that you are just overworrying yourselves to death over something Lucas felt to make sure the movie can still be rated PG-13.

just my 2 cents.


Post Posted: April 7th 2005 6:06 am
 

Join: July 24th 2004 6:46 am
Posts: 878
Location: Norway
It´s just a piece of hardware attached to her during the hospital-stay, not that big a deal.


Post Posted: April 7th 2005 6:19 am
 

Join: July 27th 2004 2:20 pm
Posts: 89
Location: Syracuse, NY
VT-16 wrote:
It´s just a piece of hardware attached to her during the hospital-stay, not that big a deal.


Exactly. :heavymetal:


Post Posted: April 7th 2005 6:37 am
 
User avatar

Join: December 23rd 2004 11:19 pm
Posts: 467
Location: Left side of right coast
swjkie100 wrote:


BTW I think the Padme edit has a lot to do with the craziness of ratings. Full-on childbirth would probably raise the movie to pg-13 or some such craziness.


GL already predicted and is happy with a pg-13 rating or so he says , so i don't think it is that. Plus I don't think they ever were planinng on showing anythjng graphic.

I can just see yoda now" the afterbirth bring to me, meditate on this I shall" :whateva:


Post Posted: April 7th 2005 6:45 am
 

Join: March 26th 2005 4:34 pm
Posts: 310
Location: Netherlands
I always imagined the babies would be delivered with a ceserean birth? That could explain the thing they cgi-ed over her lower half.


Post Posted: April 7th 2005 6:54 am
 

Join: July 24th 2004 6:46 am
Posts: 878
Location: Norway
Doctor: Perform a C-section.

Machine: Roger, roger!


Post Posted: April 7th 2005 7:02 am
 

Join: July 27th 2004 2:20 pm
Posts: 89
Location: Syracuse, NY
VT-16 wrote:
Doctor: Perform a C-section.

Machine: Roger, roger!


That was probably one of the pointless lines ever uttered in TPM. I didn't want these battledroids to say that.


Post Posted: April 7th 2005 7:23 am
 
OBGYN
User avatar

Join: August 25th 2004 12:31 pm
Posts: 3644
I wanted them to say "Roger Dodger" instead.

:whateva:


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Page 1, 2  Next



Jump to:  




millenniumfalcon.com©
phpBB©