Quote:
Visionaries is completely removed from canon. It's not even EU continuity. It's a bunch of "What If's?" and other like hypothetical situations done by the concept artists of RotS. Some of it may mirror or be similar to EU bits, but none of it is "for real" in whatever sense you want to take that.
Please post proof that it is completely outside official continuity.
Quote:
It would seem Greivous' actual backstory is pretty similar to the Visionaries tale, save for the fact that Sifo-Dyas was nowhere NEAR involved.
Once again, post proof that his involvment is not part of the continuity. All I see from the OS article is that the story highlights his creation. Nowhere does it say that it is non-canon.
Quote:
I mean, compare it with stuff like Maul vs. Obi-Wan on Tatooine. It's just a sheep's wet dream that's fun to read, but would never "actually happen" in the Star Wars continuity. Maul is dead. These stories are not part of the timeline - do not use them in arguments about the rest of the Star Wars universe.
On what autority can you say that?
I know the Maul-story is a stretch, but unless it is stated that it, and all the other stories/paintings, are non-canon, I´m going to discuss whatever I want. Grievous got a blood-transfusion and had his mind manipulated by the Sith, he´s an artificial Sith, more or less.