Back in 2012, when the ST was announced, I wasn't filled with excitement and enthusiasm. Instead, I thought: why?
The story that George set out to tell was completed with Revenge of the Sith. He said as much a hundred times, despite the early drafts of The Star Wars referencing a nine-chapter story and some off-hand comments about their being a trilogy of trilogies. But much of those later chapters found their way into Return of the Jedi and there was never a true outline about what would happen after the victory on Endor. As George would say over the years, the story of the Star Wars saga was a family opera chronicling the rise, fall and redemption of Anakin Skywalker over the backdrop of a millennia-long war between the forces of good and evil. In his vision (much to the chagrin of Gary Kurtz), the story was meant to culminate with an idilic fairy tale closeout where good has finally triumphed over evil, balance to the universe has been restored and our heroes lived happily ever after. This was the modern myth George set out to create, and its story was fully told.
So where then, would the story of Episodes 7-9 go from there? I saw three paths this could go down:
1. There was some major plot thread or story beat left unsettled by saga's end that needed further examination, possibly the galactic consequences of the dark side creating the unnatural Skywalker bloodline. While I was skeptical of this, Toy Story 4 has proved that adding more story to an already perfect ending
can work with an interesting conceit
2. The ST would be an epilogue, extraneous and irrelevant to the story of the Skywalkers but possibly value-added in a "so that's what happened afterwards" kind of way. We're talking creation of the Jedi order kind of stuff with some new lore sprinkled in
3. It would completely undermine all that our characters had fought and suffered for in Episodes I-VI
So maybe I wasn't excited, but I was certainly interested to see how this would play out. I've also learned that making great Star Wars movies is hard (arguably this hasn't been done since 1980) and after the prequels, I'd kind of had enough of the cycle of hope, speculation, disappointment, and cynicism. With so much stacked against it, and all of the needle threading that would need to be done to pull this trilogy off, I believed there was far more risk of further harm to the franchise than any potential reward.
But it's Star Wars! Star Wars is supposed to inspire hope! First news of the original cast returning brought hope, so did hearing that John Williams was coming back, then Michael Arndt (who did an entire talk about 'how Star Wars is the perfect movie') was writing the script based on Lucas's treatments, then holy shit! Larry Kasdan was coming on board, and then JJ Abrams - who had already made a damn fine Star Wars film called "Star Trek" - was directing Episode VII. Oh, and longtime Spielberg/Lucas collaborator and mega-producer Kathy Kennedy was holding the wheel at Lucasfilm. She'd NEVER release a poor product with stakes this high.
If there were ever a list of ingredients that could legitimately deliver a good result, this seemed to be it.
Here we are seven years later at the end of the sequel trilogy and the now dubbed "Skywalker Saga." I'm writing this at a time when anonymous reddit posters and their "sources" are coming for blood with stories of boardroom drama and production meddling. This post isn't about that. I'm going to try my best to stick to the films in my commentary, not re-hash all the alleged behind-the-scenes garbage going on at Disney/Lucasfilm. I want to get my thoughts down about what's actually been put on screen, and what inferences I can draw about the production therefrom. It's hard to talk about The Rise of Skywalker without talking about the other instalments in the sequel trilogy, and commenting on the broader saga now that it's all in the can, so there will be a bit of that as well.
Where do I start...
I can't believe there was no overarching idea for how this trilogy of movies would end. That was my honest to God reaction as I walked out of The Rise of Skywalker.
I honestly can't believe that filmmakers this accomplished, who I truly believe love and respect the legacy of this franchise and, more importantly, understand the business impact of honouring that legacy, would embark on producing a trilogy of sequels without a vision - even broad strokes - for how this 42 year epic should end. My mind went back to
this image of the creative team (JJ, Kathy Kennedy, John Knoll, Rick Carter, etc) prepping for Episode VII, which at the time gave me confidence that smart people, not the yes-men that surrounded Lucas during the prequel era, were going to help shepherd the future of the franchise. So I thought back to that image and said to myself: If there was any discussion in those endless meetings about how the Star Wars saga should end, or what the purpose of this trilogy should be, it sure as hell didn't make it into Episode IX.
I want to make clear that I do not believe that Episodes VII, VIII and IX should have been written or even fully treated before they rolled film on VII. That's not how the OT was made, nor was it how the PT was developed. There should be room for organic creative discovery as these films are produced. In other words, we can take side routes on our way to the destination, but we need to fundamentally know where we're going. We need to know the purpose of the journey we are taking. Episode IX is what happens when you pack your bags for a family vacation, get in the van, drive around your neighbourhood aimlessly for a few hours while you figure out where you want to go, but then just decide to drive back and spend the holidays at home.
There is no fucking way that Kathy, JJ or Jesus H. Christ knew that Sheev Palpatine would return to this saga from those story meetings.
Quick acknowledgement: I respect the art and process of screenwriting. It is hard. It's clear that this film's production had to be rushed in the wake of Trevorrow's (rightful) firing, and although that doesn't excuse some of the poor choices that were made with TROS, it does speak to the notion that these sequel films needed more time to breath. They should have stuck with the instalments being separated by three years instead of two and we might have had a far better result here and with this entire trilogy of films.
THE DEAD SPEAKThere is more plot in the opening 10 minutes of TROS than there is in the entire OT. I'm all for a rip-roaring adventure (Indiana Jones is all about McGuffin chasing and hopscotch plotting), but the problem is that none of it holds up when you stop to ask
why? to anything that's happening in the story. Why is Palpatine back? Why did he broadcast his return to the whole galaxy? Why did Palpatine make Snoke? Why are there a vat of Snokes if after the first Snoke is killed, Palpatine just steps in himself? Why did there need to be a First Order at all if this Final Order is seemingly a hundred times larger with a hundred times more recruits? Why did there need to be Starkiller base if Palpatine had been building a fleet of planet-killing SD's for 30 years? Why did Palpatine need to hide these SD's under ice if Exegol was impossible to find without Wayfinders? Why are they called Wayfinders when they are obviously inspired by Sith Holocrons?
Why do we need a secret intercepted message to get to a crashed ship, to stumble upon a dagger, to get another secret encoded message, to point us in the direction of a secret place, where we need to use the dagger to find the entrance to the secret place, all to find a space compass to point us in the direction of another even more secret place? Wait...what? Ultimately, this film just wants to be about "let's find out where the bad guys are so we can blow them up before they blow up the galaxy" but instead of getting to the point, like ANH or even ROTJ does, we go on this meandering artifact chase that sucks the life out of the characters and gives the drama no room to breathe.
Let's pretend for a second that this convoluted plot, ridden with holes in logic as it is, was somehow executed in a compelling way. It still contains so many ideas that are completely incongruous with the canon established outside the films, the films in prior trilogies, and the films in this trilogy, that it makes the suspension of disbelief impossible for anyone paying even mild attention to what's been happening in this story. If it's the assassin's ship that dropped Rey off on Jakku, why did Ochi have to question Rey's parents where to find her? This whole Rey being dropped off on Jakku business doesn't make sense to me and I've seen the film twice. If Palpatine was controlling Snoke, why did Snoke want Ren to kill Rey in TLJ? Why was Luke looking for Exegol? Did he suspect Palpatine was alive? If he did, why wouldn't he have suspected Palpatine was behind Ben's seduction? Worse, if he did, why would he seclude himself on Act-To if he knew that the ultimate evil was back? Would the return of the Sith not validate the need for Jedi to return, at least until Palpatine was dealt with? Luke ("who are you, Rey from nowhere?") and Leia both knew Rey was a Palpatine? Bullshit. Didn't Chewie get his medal in the new Star Wars comics? Didn't the books explain that Luke and Snoke knew each other years before Ben was seduced? Doesn't the most recent Kylo Ren comic speak of a Snoke prior to facial scarring (the visual dictionary for TROS says that Snoke was engineered to be scarred)? Since when is Exegol the Sith world? Why wouldn't Palpatine have used it as his base of operations in the PT to fortify the Sith's strength while the Jedi were running the show in Coruscant? Oh, and isn't Morriband canon as of the Clone Wars? This Dyad in the Force you're telling us about...wasn't Snoke the one who bridged Rey and Ren's minds? That doesn't seem as unique as what Palpatine or Kylo Ren tells us in TROS.
This is just what's coming off the top of my head. Does nobody think of this stuff in story meetings?
LIKE MY FATHER BEFORE MEIn ANH, Luke Skywalker was a simple farm boy. He has ambitions of being a hero pilot and as he came to learn about his father's life as a great warrior, he aspired to live up to that legacy. Luke is not a mystery box. The reason why "I am your father" is a plot twist and not a revelation, is because up until that very moment we don't even give a shit about Luke's father. We've just accepted, as Luke has, that his father is long dead, murdered by the villain of the story. ANH didn't need or care for us to know who Luke is; it just needed us to want to root for him. Making the identity of the central protagonist of the sequels a mystery out of the gate was the single biggest flaw of this entire trilogy.
Daisy Ridley is a star. I'd argue she's as good on screen as any of the Star Wars leads that have come before. She carries the weight of these movies on her back. But it's Daisy's charisma is what makes me like and cheer for Rey. The character however, is never given a chance to just exist in this world because all the scripts (and consequently, the audience) just ask who the hell she is for three movies without letting her just be a hero. What's her last name? Why does she longingly reference her family? Who are they? Why did she say her identity is classified, a big secret? Why is Kylo Ren particularly interested in her identity? Why is Maz curious? Why does Luke's saber call to her? Why does it choose her over Kylo Ren?
If the character was called "Rey Solo," or "Rey Skywalker," or "Rey Jansen" in Episode VII, the world would have just accepted the character's place in this story instead of theorizing endlessly about it, and the filmmakers wouldn't have had to spend so much of the third film in this trilogy retconning the previous two, and arguably the previous eight. Rey's lineage as a Palpatine and the fate of her parents makes no sense to me. First, when does Palpatine fuck? Second, why would Palpatine kill his son instead of trying to turn him to the dark side? if the Force is so strong with Rey that she's overpowered in TFA, I assume her father would have been strong with the Force as well. If so, and if he rebuked Palpatine once upon a time, then why didn't he defend himself and his wife? If he's not, does the Force sometimes skip a generation? If so, that's in conflict with the way the Force has been explained in the prior films.
Star Wars doesn't function well when there's too much plot. Not only did this film have to really stretch with the whole Final Order/Palpatine/Exegol stuff, it had to use multiple flashbacks and introduce multiple new characters as crutches to stabilize the plight of its protagonist instead of being able to just organically propel the action forward with what had been established in the prior canon. As a result, we don't fucking care about any of manufactured backstory. It's artificial and weightless. We're told some bad guy we have never met kills Rey's parents, whom we never knew nor have cared about. Then we're told that her grandfather, who we the audience have long-believed to be dead and Rey the character had no awareness of, is the one pulling the strings. That's too much to ask of the audience. We can't relate to the drama because the stakes can't even be fully appreciated by the characters themselves.
After TFA, I broke down what I thought of Rey Palpatine/Skywalker/Kenobi/nobody. Kenobi/Palpatine might have been operatic, but far more challenging to pull off as I assumed both characters could not return to the franchise and there would be an implausibility to their having any offspring. Luke made sense, since he was clearly staying out of sight on Ach-To (maybe he tried to save his child by sending her far away from Kylo and the Jedi killers?) and he could have explained away Rey's mother the same way Padme was explained away in the OT. Rey the nobody could work if it served a story function that connected her to the Skywalker saga. Whichever way the filmmakers decided to go, it had to be resolved by Episode VIII if we were to resolve the story by IX. I don't gush over TLJ by any means, but once that choice was made the filmmakers had to accept it and just go and tell the best version of why Rey from nowhere makes sense. Backtracking from that decision meant wasted runtime retconning Episode VII and VIII at a point when our characters just needed to move the story forward. It failed.
There should have been a cinematic rule that no flashbacks can ever be used in these movies to convey story information. The narrative of the saga should have been built from what the audience knew going in. If it did, we wouldn't have thankless mysteries like "who is Rey" or "who is Snoke," both of which resulted in major storytelling problems for the sequel trilogy.
DO OR DO NOT. THERE IS NO TRYThere are many narrative flaws in this film: Palpatine returning without the slightest tease in the prior two films, Rey's connection to Palpatine being a head scratching development at best, everything to do with the First and Final Orders, the McGuffin-filled plot, the complete retcon of character actions and events in TFA and TLJ, and the continued confusion about Force ghost powers. However, I'd argue that good execution - a well-paced film with likeable characters, inventive sequences, great technical filmmaking (cinematography, production design, music), and strong dramatic beats - can trump an undercooked script. A good part of TFA works because it's largely well-made. Its energy comes from the character interactions and the sense of fun emanating from well-paced sequences.
I can't believe JJ Abrams made this movie. That was the second thought I had after leaving The Rise of Skywalker.
I was prepared to disagree with narrative choices, forced fan service and maybe even second half plot developments that feel hamfisted into the story (Super 8 and TFA both suffer from this). I did not expect sloppy pacing, awkward character interactions, an overwhelming amount of new
toys worthless character introductions, largely stale set pieces, and lifeless drama. None of the stakes are properly set up. There is no time for any scene in this film to breathe. There are no consequences for character actions (including Threepio, four people "die" in this movie only to come back to life moments later). There are no real plans for what our heroes need to do in order to win or a clear description of the obstacles in the way of accomplishing their mission. Success feels totally random and unearned (Lando rallies the galaxy to rebel in ten minutes. Something Leia and the Resistance couldn't do on Crait, Luke couldn't inspire after his sacrifice, and our heroes failed at doing in the year or so between TLJ and TROS). As a result of all of this, the resolutions don't feel earned and the film feels completely unsatisfying. Even Luke's role, and Mark Hamill's performance, felt mailed in.
I felt like I was watching a shell of a Star Wars movie.
But I didn't think all of the execution was bad. There were clearly some narrative beats and set pieces that were more well-developed, and that JJ was really passionate about nailing. The entire sequence on Death Star ruins is the highlight of the film for me. We get stellar production design, great performances from Ridley and Driver, a unique lightsaber battle, and a more emotional resolution than anything else in the film. Ridley really sold it with the final exchange: "I did want to take your hand. Ben's hand." I even welled up during the Han Solo scene: "Dad..." "I know." The Kylo-Rey ForceTime lightsaber encounter is another well done sequence but there's nothing else in the film that comes close to the Rey-Kylo drama, largely because the characters are too busy hopscotching around the galaxy for a compass to allow us to invest in their emotional journey.
There was some really well-written/performed comedic beats, which would have been more fun if the story were more engaging on a dramatic level. This is as funny as Threepio has been, maybe ever; Poe smashing the Falcon against the cave wall and apologizing to Chewie for it was a pure Star Wars moment; and Babu Frik - who would have thought this little thing could steal the show.
Unfortunately, there's also a bunch of potential that went completely wasted. Force healing is an ancient Jedi power that hasn't been used in the 8 previous movies - cool, so tell us why this is so special, and why that makes our hero(es) all the more impressive for using it? Imagine there were Sith acolytes who were loyal to the resurrection and maintenance of the Sith Order - great, so tell us about them! Maybe these were the same kind of folk who surrounded the Emperor in ROTJ? Rey and Ben form a "Dyad in the Force" - cool, so develop this concept if you think it's so key to their connection. The Knights of Ren seem cool - nope, they're just stormtroopers. This film is meant to be the resolution of 9 movies and a millennia-long battle between the Jedi and the Sith - so tell us more about what "Balance" to the Force means since nobody seems to be able to agree on it. You might have even saved the film from the biggest sin, which I'll get into later. In other words, if you're going to bring new lore to the saga in its final instalment, why not bring depth to what's come before versus adding brand new layers to this already unwieldy stacked cake? And, lightspeed-skipping - sounds like a fun concept, but it's short-changed as an action sequence and never comes back to play a role in the plot the way we expect it to.
I cannot stand poor technical filmmaking, and what breaks these films for me is when John Williams' music is butchered or poorly edited into the final mix. Next to AOTC, TROS might be the worst offender in this regard. There are entire motifs from the OST that are completely absent from the movie. There are sequences where music from previous films is used instead of original music. There are moments that need the music to be at a 10 to deliver emotional impact and the volume is at a 5. This kind of stuff breaks my heart, and it tells me that this film was being edited until the last minute. Rushed production impacted the final product.
WHO IS LUKE SKYWALKER?"Who is Luke Skywalker?"
This is the question that Kathy Kennedy used to lure JJ to the Star Wars franchise and direct Episode VII. Apparently, there was a giant mystery or further story to be explored about the "Son of Suns," the hero of the Rebellion to helped his father bring Balance to the Force (whatever that means).
Based on the events of this trilogy, I gather that Luke is the following:
A) a disgraced Jedi Master who got his mojo back in time to help a small group of resistance fighters escape
B) the spark that tried to light the fire to bring the First Order down, but was unsuccessful
B) an inspiring armorer who powered up our hero on her quest to defeat the bad guy
Based on the above, I would say that Kathy Kennedy was not seriously interested in answering this question. In fact, I honestly couldn't tell you what question the sequel trilogy was actually interested in asking, never mind answering.
In the end, TROS doesn't settle any lingering story threads and doesn't add anything of real value to the lore or canonical story of the Skywalker family. Unfortunately, it takes the third of my expected routes: it undoes the narrative impact of Vader's fulfillment of the Chosen One prophecy and effectively minimizes the entire resolution of the Galactic Civil War. The sequel trilogy ended up being a less dramatic, less cohesive and less coherent retelling of the original trilogy.
The Rise of Skywalker itself is a title that bears little relevance to the actual film. What is Skywalker rising from or aspiring to? Are we meant to take the title literally as Ben Solo emerging from a pit, recalling the "The Dark Knight Rises"? Or is this a way of saying that Rey, as a now adopted "Skywalker" has risen from her dark origins as a Palpatine? I'm not sure Kathy Kennedy knows the answer to that either.
I KNOW WHAT I HAVE TO DO, BUT I DON'T KNOW IF I HAVE THE STRENGTH TO DO ITI imagined quite a few outcomes for this trilogy but what took me most by surprise is that there would be no vision, no roadmap, no plan for how this narrative would play out. For those alleging that this is a Disney problem, look no further than the studio next door who in 2012 released their first of several "team up" films and was preparing for the second phase of their interconnected cinematic universe. In 2019, Kevin Feige had put the finishing touches on the 22nd film in the MCU's third phase, a crown jewel picture that culminated the major storylines of the films that preceded it. The nearly two-dozen films were written and directed by 15 different directors and more than a dozen writers. Meanwhile, at Lucasfilm, the creative team was focussed on producing six pictures between 2015-2020. The sequel problems didn't have to do with the Mouse House: they had to do with creative mismanagement at Lucasfilm Ltd.
There is a fundamental misunderstanding about what makes Star Wars special by this team. This franchise thrived when content was sparse, not excessive. When the movies were cinematic events, not flavours of the month. When they stood for universal themes and allegories, not overly politicized message platforms. They are modern myths that need room to grow, not pander to broken fandoms or recycle story beats.
"It's all connected" was a popular saying back in 2012, when the expanded universe was washed away in favour of a new canon. But Episode IX, and the sequel trilogy as a whole, have undone that a fair bit. There's been so much investment by fans for the past seven years into absorbing everything new canon. So much work that book writers, TV producers, game developers, and comic writers have put into this universe that has been marginalized. What the hell was the point of the (now defunct) story group if not to make sure this universe was cohesive?
I JUST GOT A FUNNY FEELING I'M NOT GONNA SEE HER AGAINI'm not sure how TROS will impact my love for Star Wars. I still love the OT. I love Clone Wars and Rebels. I enjoyed the Mandalorian's first season. I even love certain aspects of this trilogy, which I still believe on the whole delivers a higher quality of production than what the PT did; it just has the opposite problems.
I am grateful for Rey, Finn, Poe, Kylo Ren, BB-8, "Chewie, we're home," Rey's theme, "that's not how the Force works!," Carrie Fisher's return, Luke's and Artoo reunited, Captain Canady, "I will not be the last Jedi," seeing Lando again, seeing Wedge again, and "send Leia my love."
Whatever the future of Star Wars brings, it's time the fandom accept that there will never be Star Wars content that can replicate or approach the magic delivered by the original trilogy. Expectations for this franchise need to change, or fans will risk being perpetually disappointed. I do really hope that toxicity in the fandom finds a way to cool and accept the product for what it is: one with strengths and weaknesses, still capable of delivering joy, albeit not in the way it used to.
The reality is that nothing is ever as good as it used to be and the OT truly was lightning in a bottle. Remember, once upon a time, a can of Coke cost 50 cents and they served free meals on airplanes. Now we have to take our shoes off at airport security.