CoGro wrote:
I think it's obvious that 7-9 is just the first of a series of sequel trilogies...
Really? I honestly don't think so. I think that's where the 'Anthology' (now 'Story') movies come in.
CoGro wrote:
and I'm not especially happy with this.
Okay, but if it were done really, really well? I'd be happy.
CoGro wrote:
I want the Star Wars saga to have a beginning, middle and an end, not just be a run of a mill summer blockbuster franchise that gets sequeled to death.
I see your point to a degree, but it's likely going to happen. And given the size of the Star Wars Universe, maybe it can take that.
CoGro wrote:
The more of Episode VII I see, the less I believe it will have deep connective tissue to the arc of the first six episodes.
Genuinely - I think exactly the opposite. I'm delighted at how much seems new but familiar - a real feeling of 'next chapter' for me.
CoGro wrote:
Instead, I think Episode VII will start a 6-film arc in much the same way Episode I did with Darth Vader. In that sense, Episode VII really could be considered a "reboot" after all: it's treating the previous 6 films as "myth" as a jumping off point, but re-shaping the conflict and introducing a completely new set of heroes/villains with different motivations under different circumstances.
How can you say it's treating the previous 6 as myth when you've not seen it? And it has our favourite heroes in it? I agree it's a new jumping off point to a degree, but it's keeping the best of the past and giving us 'a new hope' too (wocka wocka, bad pun.) I mean, I love Harrison Ford as Han and Indy, but the guy is 73. If we want more of this, there has to be change, to a certain degree.
I've heard a lot of people saying "Booo!" to the idea of bringing back Palp or Vader - but this is a universe that had a massive clone army. If Kylo Ren is hunting for all those artefacts - why? And they just might have DNA...
If any or all of this is done right - it will be worth it. If it's not, we'll hate it. Time will tell, but for now? I have faith.