CoGro wrote:
I consider myself to be pretty well versed in comic lore and I had no memory of ever hearing about the Watchmen until I saw the trailer before The Dark Knight.
Alexrd wrote:
Sorry for the little dig: Those two statements make no sense. Watchmen is considered the King of comics.

The zombie-like twitching of this seemingly dead thread piqued my interest. And I gotta' tell you, as a comics fan from way back Pre-watchmen, I understood what
Watchmen was, so I was not as oblivious to it as Mr Gro, whom you have chosen to "dig" at, apparently was.
However, after flipping through it as a kid and realizing the art kind of "sucked", I never picked it up again. Too long too, for what it was. The artistic style didn't lend to me being interested long enough to sit through it all.
The Dark Knight graphic novel, however, was dope as all getout around the same time. In a contest to be "King of comics", for that era of releases or any non-chronilogical comparrison/battle, old man Bruce Wayne stomps the Watchmens heads into a collective and brutal post appocalyptic mud puddle. Ronald Reagan, half naked Amazon Nazi breasts, and Iron-Bat Vs. Blue guy and something that looks like my eight year old cousin colored the newspaper comic strip in and pasted it together. No contest really.
So the idea that some folks hadn't heard about it doesn't surprise me much
Myself, as a kid I wanted the five minutes I spent flipping through it back, out of principal. The cover logo was so cool. And the inside such shit. Even the story, it's kind of "not so groundbreaking" to me, then and now. I had hoped the film would be a better fit for me to try and squeeze some enjoyment out of this property after all these years. Y'know what? Nope. Still shit. Really pretty, fantastically shot, somewhat visually interesting pile of wtf in my mind. Sorry.