It is currently May 2nd 2025 8:11 am




  Page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 14  Next
Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 5:54 pm
 
Site Admin
User avatar

Join: May 25th 1977 7:00 am
Posts: 1669
R.I.P Heath


Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 6:14 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
I guess the Joker isn't in the sequel too soon?


Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 6:52 pm
 

Join: July 27th 2004 5:49 pm
Posts: 212
Here's to hoping they tie up this end real nice in the film.

If not, or his pick ups and voice over isn't finished I wonder if they would postpone the release of THE DARK KNIGHT or even recast the role? I know its late...but shit, this sucks.


Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 7:01 pm
 
User avatar

Join: September 15th 2006 11:25 pm
Posts: 136
Seeing as how Nolan was previously hesitant to make a 3rd Batman, I'd say it's very unlikely now.

Seems like watching this movie is going to be pretty odd now; seeing as how it will be Ledger's last performance and he plays a crazy guy.


Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 7:37 pm
 
User avatar

Title: Mortician
Join: May 26th 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 1923
Location: Progress City
Sad to see someone go out like that. My condolences.


Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 7:53 pm
 

Join: April 25th 2004 8:34 pm
Posts: 577
Madness.

I guess they're going to have to change tack on the whole marketing campaign for TDK I've heard rumours they're going to delay the release of the movie, but that would just be ridiculous I know if I was a member of his family, I'd want to honor his memory with what sounds like, one of the all-time great performances.


Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 8:13 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
Quote:
Hey folks, Harry here... There's a lot of rumors swirling around right now in regards to Heath and where his involvement with THE DARK KNIGHT was. I got it confirmed from a source involved in Post-Production on THE DARK KNIGHT. Heath's post work was complete. He had indeed finished it, as to not interfere with the production of the film he was doing with Gilliam. We're now working to find out what's going to happen there. The last known photo of Heath was as a clown in that film. Will Terry re-cast? What will happen? We'll try to find out for all of you. But there will be no-dubbing on Heath in THE DARK KNIGHT - his performance was finished.


from AICN..


Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 8:30 pm
 

Join: May 21st 2006 8:13 pm
Posts: 122
RIP Heath


Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 9:46 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
now the latest is he was sick with pneumonina at the time. and it WAS accidental. very, very sad


Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 10:22 pm
 

Join: April 25th 2004 8:34 pm
Posts: 577
Why did he not go the doctor odd that sleeping pills would have that kinda effect


Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 10:41 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
odd that sleeping pills would kill? dude, sleeping pills are big time dangerous. they can stop your heart. they slow everything down. people od on those all the time.


Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 10:55 pm
 

Join: July 27th 2004 5:49 pm
Posts: 212
Verboten wrote:
Seeing as how Nolan was previously hesitant to make a 3rd Batman, I'd say it's very unlikely now.

Seems like watching this movie is going to be pretty odd now; seeing as how it will be Ledger's last performance and he plays a crazy guy.


Actually, his last performance was Bob Dylan in I'M NOT THERE.

maybe not. I thought I'M NOT THERE was filmed after principle filming wrapped on THE DARK KNIGHT but I guess I am mistaken.


Post Posted: January 23rd 2008 12:56 am
 
User avatar

Title: Mortician
Join: May 26th 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 1923
Location: Progress City
Well, sure, sleeping pills can kill you. But pnuemonia itself can kill you too. In fact, I'd think it's more likely. I guess the autopsy will reveal the actual cause. I had pnuemonia once, and the Doctor told me that the fever I had because of it was more dangerous than the not being able to breathe right part. Having a fever over 102-103 is pure hell. The increase in body heat makes your head feel like it's going to burst open and the excruciating pain from that alone makes you want to vomit, a lot. It did make me feel quite disoriented too, which in the wrong circumstances can itself also be pretty dangerous.

I don't know if this is at all like what happened here. I'm just pointing out some of the effects I'm familiar with, to illustrate the fact that just having pnuemonia can be life threatening. Hope for the deceased's sake it wasn't quite that bad.


Post Posted: January 23rd 2008 1:04 am
 

Join: April 25th 2004 8:34 pm
Posts: 577
Hmmm, wow. That sounds really horrible.

I think if he did have pnuemonia then I guess it's possible with that plus taking a whole lotta sleeping tablets would finish you off. I mean, just putting two and two together it sounds like a logical conclusion.

If it was pretty bad I guess he just wanted to sleep the sickness off or something speculation of course. I'm just hoping it wasn't something like suicide. Because the guy seems like he had more of a clue than to do that.


Post Posted: January 23rd 2008 1:20 am
 
User avatar

Join: June 29th 2004 7:46 pm
Posts: 189
They were saying on CNN that he had a prescription of Ambien, which is a prescription sleeping pill. I don't know if anyone here has ever taken it, but it can really fuck you up. If it's true he had it, it could have easily been an accidental overdose, especially if he was sick with pneumonia.

So sad. I hope that if they do a third movie, they don't bring back the Joker.

RIP Heath Ledger.


Post Posted: January 23rd 2008 2:02 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 20th 2004 11:57 pm
Posts: 523
Location: Southern California
The news is starting to really sink in for me today although it's still pretty hard to believe. The fact that this may have been accidental makes it all the more difficult to accept.


Post Posted: January 23rd 2008 5:14 pm
 
User avatar

Join: June 29th 2004 7:46 pm
Posts: 189
http://wwtdd.com/post.phtml?pk=3428

http://wwtdd.com/post.phtml?pk=3425

This makes me sick.


Post Posted: January 23rd 2008 7:16 pm
 
Bush Pilot
User avatar

Join: March 23rd 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 1483
CoGro wrote:
I guess the Joker isn't in the sequel...

Unfortunately the first thing I thought, too. This news is very, very sad. The man had so much potential.


Post Posted: January 23rd 2008 11:45 pm
 
User avatar

Join: November 14th 2003 6:06 am
Posts: 818
Unfuckingbelievable. :o

As bizarre as this will sound, I'll wager this will add many millions to the b.o. take of TDK.

This is like when Dean died before 'Giant' was released. People who wouldn't necessarily have gone to see TDK will now go. It's morbid, but it's true.


Post Posted: January 24th 2008 12:25 am
 

Join: April 25th 2004 8:34 pm
Posts: 577
I don't know about that. The thing is, TDK had good buzz to begin with, everyone has been saying for months how outstanding Ledgers performance was and from what I've read on the 'net there hasn't been many negative opinions in general, save the odd little tweak here and there from the purists. Nolan seems to have done the unthinkable and appeased even the core Batman freaks and the general fans alike he's crafted, from the marketing, teasers, posters and online viral stuff a really exciting, interesting and amazing Batman film he's casted some pretty incredible actors to boot!

I mean, no disrespect but TDK was more a sum of it's parts, than JUST hanging on Heath Ledger although, an absolulte integral core of the film will be built around the Joker character and his portrayal Nolan has said many times HIS vision of Batman is ALWAYS about the Bruce Wayne/Batman dynamic and at the core of his Franchise vision has always been Batman as the central focus.

So taking all of this into consideration, I don't think Heaths death is going to change the Box-Office results, and we're too far out from the movies release , if it was released tomorrow I think it would open to a massive audience, but I still think regardless of his death, it's STILL going to open big I think the media and if the unthinkable happens and it's a shit film (which I can't possibly see it being anything less than brilliant at this stage) I think the media WILL say his death brought in the dollars, which is a horrid thing for anyone to even think, let alone be true.

So I honestly can't see his death affecting the movie financially, either beneficial or in a negative way especially as it's release date is still months away.

There are possibilities though that his death IS going to force WB to change tack on the Viral marketing stuff, which is solely focussed around the Joker I think you'll see the film change tack on the Posters and Main-stream marketing (think Trailers and TV-Spots) which I think will turn towards a more "Batman/Bale" focus and holding back on the "edgier" parts of Heaths Performance.

That's just common sense and to be honest, the best marketing for 'Begins' was the Bale/Batman stuff anyways.

I don't think any of that will hurt the film, it was Bale's protrayal of Batman that MADE Batman Begins and what GAVE us the sequel I think in all this, if anything will happen is that Bale's fine work will be pushed to the side and made a mere anecdote, which WILL be a shame, because he's a fine actor in his own right.

and to take anything away from his performance, would not be something i'm sure Heath would've wanted to happen regardless of his 'Joker' stealing the show!


Post Posted: January 24th 2008 12:30 pm
 

Join: April 2nd 2005 4:05 am
Posts: 157
ki adi moonshine wrote:
They were saying on CNN that he had a prescription of Ambien, which is a prescription sleeping pill. I don't know if anyone here has ever taken it, but it can really fuck you up. If it's true he had it, it could have easily been an accidental overdose, especially if he was sick with pneumonia.

So sad. I hope that if they do a third movie, they don't bring back the Joker.

RIP Heath Ledger.


Actually, non-benzodiazepine drugs like Ambien and other "Z"s are supposed to be pretty safe when taken as prescribed. Unfortunately, people seldom take things by themselves. As for the true cause of death, we really need the report from his medical examiner.

My bro and I were talking about this yesterday and I just think that TDK will be indelibly linked with Heath's death, like watching The Crow and Brandon Lee. It's not how things were supposed to go, but that's life... :(


Post Posted: January 24th 2008 2:45 pm
 
Bush Pilot
User avatar

Join: March 23rd 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 1483
I'm getting tired of seeing CNN and others constantly running footage of Ledger's body being wheeled out of his apartment. A little respect please?


Post Posted: January 25th 2008 12:44 am
 
User avatar

Join: November 14th 2003 6:06 am
Posts: 818
Biggs, the problem with my belief is that nobody will ever say, "Oh, I just came out of a morbid curiousity to see this guy's last performance." It's like when people bottleneck at accidents on the highway. Few admit to it, but pretty much everyone does it.


A classy move. :heavymetal: (Click on the bat symbol)

http://thedarkknight.warnerbros.com/


Post Posted: January 25th 2008 5:40 am
 

Join: April 25th 2004 8:34 pm
Posts: 577
That's really a classy, simple tribute from WB.

they've also put up an image of a black-ribbon on the whysoserious.com site as well. Which, I think speaks volumes in itself. You gotta admit, WB's gotta be given some good kudos on this, and Chris Nolan.

Goes to show, there's a heart in a faceless money-making corporate organisation sometimes!


Post Posted: February 8th 2008 2:22 am
 

Join: April 2nd 2005 4:05 am
Posts: 157
cnn.com sad-lessons-from-heath-ledgers-death.html

Sorry to hijack the thread again, but the cause of death: a combination of six prescription drugs. Ledger "died as the result of acute intoxication by the combined effects of oxycodone, hydrocodone, diazepam, temazepam, alprazolam, and doxylamine." i.e. OxyContin, Vicodin, Valium, Xanax, Restoril, & Unisom. Ambien (zolpidem) wasn't on the list.

Since I'm in health care, I just want to implore everyone not to mix your meds. Please tell your doctor what you're taking. They can always attempt to find better/safer combinations and advise on potential dangers. More than anything, we just want you to be alive and well. R.I.P. Heath


Post Posted: February 8th 2008 11:51 am
 

Join: July 27th 2004 5:49 pm
Posts: 212
Holy crap that's quite the cocktail.


Post Posted: February 15th 2008 7:30 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
Gotham Knight preview now online:
[flash width=425 height=350]http://www.youtube.com/v/yuSwj5ok24k[/flash]


Looks Beautiful!! :o Killer Croc and Scarecrow and glimpses of what looks like ManBat !

Edit: updated with new link, old one taken down.


Post Posted: February 17th 2008 10:27 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
new Bust picture of Ledger as Joker. This seems to be a makeup test and not an actual product.

Image

toyfair 2008 pics of Bats are up.

Image

he distracts you with his bra and then pounds you in the head with his giant golden beer mugs.

Image

this one would fan you to death if his costume wasn't XXXL

Image

or you might prefer this matching orange and black ensamble with moth eaten cape and giant pincher claw


Post Posted: February 20th 2008 2:56 am
 
User avatar

Join: June 29th 2004 7:46 pm
Posts: 189
Two Face from the toy fair:

http://www.darkhorizons.com/news08/tf1.jpg
http://www.darkhorizons.com/news08/tf2.jpg

ImageImage


Post Posted: February 20th 2008 3:31 pm
 

Join: July 27th 2004 5:49 pm
Posts: 212
That Two-Face rocks but how hard is it to focus a picture really. Those Batman figures suck ass. I don't understand why they always create these lame ass figures.


Post Posted: February 20th 2008 8:58 pm
 

Join: April 25th 2004 8:34 pm
Posts: 577
They look even WORSE than the last lot produced.

Think I'll be skipping on all of them.


Post Posted: February 26th 2008 8:33 am
 
User avatar

Join: April 16th 2004 2:12 am
Posts: 157
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Full Batman: Gotham Knight Press Release
Source: Warner Home Video February 25, 2008


Here is the official press release from Warner Home Video about Batman: Gotham Knight:

[hr]
DC Comics, Warner Premiere, Warner Home Video and Warner Bros. Animation have collaborated to create a unique Batman experience in Batman: Gotham Knight. The all-new, original movie will arrive July 8, 2008 on DVD and Blu-ray Disc. Order due date is June 3, 2008. The original movie will also be available OnDemand and Pay-per-View as well as available for download on the same day as release date, July 8, 2008.

Batman: Gotham Knight is a fresh and exciting new entry into the Batman mythos, spinning out of a 40-year history in animation including the Emmy®-winning Batman: The Animated Series, widely considered a pivotal moment in American animation. A cross section of distinguished creators, award winning producers, and acclaimed writers weave six interlocking stories that reveal Bruce Wayne’s journey to Dark Knight, each with stylish art from some of the world’s most revered animation visionaries.

Batman: Gotham Knight was headed by an impressive list of directors who have brought their distinctly different anime styles to the classic Batman character. The production was divided among three renowned studios – Studio 4ºC, Production I.G and Madhouse – and included the truly inimitable visions of directors Shojiro Nishimi, Futoshi Higashide, Hiroshi Morioka, Yasuhiro Aoki and Toshiyuki Kubooka. With stories written by several of the most talented writers of film, comic books, and animation, including Academy Award®-nominated screenwriter Josh Olson (A History of Violence), David S. Goyer (Batman Begins), Emmy®-winner Alan Burnett (Batman: The Animated Series), Jordan Goldberg (Associate Producer, The Dark Knight), and award-winning comics writers Greg Rucka and Brian Azzarello, Batman: Gotham Knight presents thrilling new adventures of Batman that spotlight several of Gotham City’s most dangerous villains, including the fearsome Scarecrow, the freakish Killer Croc and the unnerving marksman known as Deadshot. Batman: Gotham Knight is produced by Emma Thomas (Batman Begins, The Dark Knight), Michael Uslan & Benjamin Melniker (Batman Begins, The Dark Knight), Toshi Hiruma and Bruce Timm (Batman: The Animated Series).

Batman: Gotham Knight will be available on DVD for $24.98 SRP. There will also be a 2-disc Special Edition DVD available for $29.98 SRP which contains additional bonus features. All the content from the 2-disc Special Edition DVD will be available on Blu-ray Disc for $34.99 SRP.

Batman: Gotham Knight DVD will feature incredible extras including:

“A Mirror for the Bat: The Evil Denizens of Gotham City” - A stimulating documentary covering Gotham City’s most nefarious of characters, combined with a look into the symbiotic relationship Batman shares with his enemies.

“Sneak Peek: Wonder Woman” - DC Universe animated original movie
Audio Commentary - Featuring the filmmakers of Gotham Knight.

Widescreen (1.78:1)

5.1 Dolby Digital

The 2-disc Special Edition DVD will feature even more incredible extras including:

“Batman and Me a Devotion of Destiny: The Bob Kane Story” - The comprehensive chronology of the remarkable life of the creator of Batman.

“Batman: The Animated Series” Bonus Episodes - Bruce Timm selects his favorite episodes from Batman: The Animated Series.

“Batman: Gotham Knight explores an exciting moment between Batman Begins and The Dark Knight,” said Paul Levitz, DC Comics President and Publisher, “and takes our fans on a very different visual trip through Gotham and Batman’s life. We’re extremely proud of this project, and look forward to adding to the momentum our DC Universe Animated Original Movie program has been building.”

“Batman: Gotham Knight is a perfect example of the type of release that Warner Premiere is becoming known for and that audiences are hungry for,” said Matt Bierman, Vice President, Production, Warner Premiere. “With incredible production values, a top-notch creative team and compelling, iconic characters from the DC Universe, Batman: Gotham Knight really raises the bar in the Direct-to-DVD arena and we’re proud to be a part of this production.”

“To date, over 13.5 million units of Batman animated titles have been sold and we are thrilled to release Batman: Gotham Knight, the next installment of the DC Universe animated original movies, which will be a hit with Super Hero and comic book fans alike,” said Amit Desai, WHV Vice President, Kids and Sports Marketing.

Batman: Gotham Knight Marketing Support

Batman: Gotham Knight will be supported by a massive media campaign including primetime TV spots, national print and online coverage. Marketing support will also include strong promotional support as well as a grassroots viral campaign.

DC UNIVERSE ORIGINAL MOVIES

DC Comics, Warner Premiere, Warner Home Video (WHV) and Warner Bros. Animation (WBA) began the production and distribution of “DC Universe,” a series of original, animated PG-13 movies in July 2006. This original made for DVD movie is part of the DC Universe series of animated PG-13 films written and directed by acclaimed comic book creators and animators and featuring recognizable talent. WHV will be the exclusive worldwide home entertainment distributor for all DC Universe movies, which will include a slate of 2-3 action-packed films per year. Superman Doomsday and Justice League: The New Frontier were the first DC Universe original animated movies. Other DC properties with films in development include Justice League, Green Lantern, Flash and Wonder Woman.

BASICS

Street Date: July 8, 2008
Order Due Date: June 3, 2008
Languages: English, Spanish
Subtitles: Spanish

Run Time: 75 minutes

Aspect Ratio: Widescreen (1.78:1)
Audio: 5.1 Dolby Surround Stereo
Color / Closed Captioned
Rating: PG-13

Batman: Gotham Knight (DVD)

Price: $24.98 SRP / No MAP
UPC: 085391123323

Batman: Gotham Knight (2 Disc Special Edition DVD)

Price: $29.98 SRP / No MAP
UPC: 0883929011155

Batman: Gotham Knight (Blu-ray Disc)

Price: $34.99 SRP / No MAP
UPC: 085391179511


[hr]


Post Posted: February 29th 2008 11:37 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
they're starting a new viral campaign centered on Harvey Dent now. http://www.ibelieveinharveydent.com has been updated. there's talk of a new trailer attached to 10,000 BC


Post Posted: March 1st 2008 4:59 pm
 

Join: July 27th 2004 5:49 pm
Posts: 212
I wonder if this will finally reveal Two-Face for us!


Post Posted: March 5th 2008 1:14 pm
 
User avatar

Join: May 10th 2005 11:51 am
Posts: 382
Location: Mon Calamari
Image


Post Posted: March 5th 2008 4:34 pm
 

Join: July 29th 2007 3:01 pm
Posts: 47
Jesus, this costume looks like fucking shit. What's the obsession of over designing something like that leg section?


Post Posted: March 5th 2008 5:29 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
He looks like a robot.

I didn't see a reason to re-design or evolve the suit to begin with.


Post Posted: March 5th 2008 9:17 pm
 

Join: April 25th 2004 8:34 pm
Posts: 577
That looks like a drawing/comic or a exceptionally over-photoshopped version of Bale-in-Suit

I actually think it looks pretty badass...


Post Posted: March 5th 2008 9:52 pm
 
User avatar

Join: May 10th 2005 11:51 am
Posts: 382
Location: Mon Calamari
Yeah Biggs, it does. Probably from the style guide for promotional use. It kind of reminds me of the promo art from the first Spider-Man film that was a hybrid of photography and rendered art. That art was all we had early on to promote Spider-Man, far before the CGI suit was rendered in the film. We were working on it almost a year before the release. I can't imagine why this would apply to the Batman costume, when we've already seen it in the last film. Regardless, I think it looks badass too.


Post Posted: March 5th 2008 10:16 pm
 

Join: July 27th 2004 5:49 pm
Posts: 212
CoGro wrote:
He looks like a robot.

I didn't see a reason to re-design or evolve the suit to begin with.


I agree. I think the only reason to make changes to the costume is to continue to make new toys. Um shitty new toys. But even then they has never stopped them from coming up with dumb costume toys.


Post Posted: March 6th 2008 9:06 am
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
With most of the Batman action happening in darkly lit areas, I don't think it really matters.


Post Posted: March 6th 2008 9:31 pm
 

Join: April 25th 2004 8:34 pm
Posts: 577
tlbauerle wrote:
CoGro wrote:
He looks like a robot.

I didn't see a reason to re-design or evolve the suit to begin with.


I agree. I think the only reason to make changes to the costume is to continue to make new toys. Um shitty new toys. But even then they has never stopped them from coming up with dumb costume toys.


I think you guys are LOOKING for negatives considering theres been absolutely perfection so far! Lighten up.

It's an over-photoshopped promotional still either for toy boxes, magazine's or calendars. I think it'll look completely different in the correct "movie" setting. Either way, he looks armoured and ready to fight. Looks awesome.


Post Posted: March 6th 2008 10:18 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
still, the best Batman costume on film so far has in my opinion been Batman: Dead End. yeah, it's cheesy with predators and aliens and a weird Joker, but Batman works in that one. He just looks believable and kick ass at the same time. simple works dammit

[flash width=425 height=350]http://www.youtube.com/v/Hjp0I_okX0w[/flash]


Post Posted: March 7th 2008 12:39 am
 

Join: April 25th 2004 8:34 pm
Posts: 577
:lol:

You're kidding right?


Post Posted: March 7th 2008 8:42 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
http://www.filmthreat.com/index.php?section=reviews&Id=4789 Kevin Smith and Alex Ross agree with me!

Quote:
It was an instant hit when it screened at the San Diego Comic-Con this past weekend and it’s had Batfans all across the net pissing themselves silly over what Kevin Smith has called “Possibly the truest, best Batman movie ever made” and what has brought Alex Ross to cry, “Batman the way I’ve always wanted to see him.” “Batman: Dead End”




edit* I just got a phone call from Harvey Dent! he talked about taking back Gotham and allowing him to take back the streets. It was Dent himself, very clear and athoratative, sounded great. He said to go to http://www.ibelieveinharveydent.com which has just been updated! :heavymetal:


Post Posted: March 10th 2008 8:17 am
 
User avatar

Join: April 16th 2004 2:12 am
Posts: 157
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Interesting article this: nytimes.com

[align=center]ImageImageImageImage[/align]

[spoil]
[hr]
[align=left]
Batman’s Burden: A Director Confronts Darkness and Death

A DREARY office plaza at Wabash Street and the river, late afternoon. A mist blows in from Lake Michigan. Producers and idle actors huddle under a flimsy canopy; grips hastily unfold another over their high-priced gear. A few stories overhead, a stunt double in a familiar black-caped costume swings from a hoist, slamming into a window in a Mies van der Rohe tower that we shall imagine is Gotham City Hall. A noose is around his neck, a knife plunged into his heart.

The meaning is clear: Batman, or at least his döppelganger, is dead.

Christopher Nolan, the director of “The Dark Knight” — the follow-up to his 2005 franchise reboot, “Batman Begins” — is unperturbed by the rain, but a tiny detail irks him. “Hey, buster!” he shouts to the stuntman, craning his neck skyward and raising his voice for the first time all day (politely, as ever, but enough so he can be heard). “Could you turn yourself a little more to the left?”

In so many ways this isn’t what you’d expect of a $180 million Hollywood comic-book movie sequel with a zillion moving parts, a cast of thousands and sets from here to Hong Kong. Anyone else would shoot indoors, use digital effects or wait for clear skies; Mr. Nolan rolls with the weather’s punches, believing that the messiness of reality can’t be faked. Another filmmaker would leave a shot like this in the hands of a second-unit director, but Mr. Nolan doesn’t use one; if it’s on the screen, he directed it, and his longtime cinematographer, Wally Pfister, worked the camera. Stars on any other movie would have fled to their trailers to wait in comfort until needed again. Here, Gary Oldman is watching and shivering along with everybody else, cracking jokes to keep warm.

Yet Mr. Nolan, 37, has barely changed his approach to filmmaking since his 2000 indie-smash “Memento,” the film noir in reverse starring Guy Pearce that Mr. Nolan’s brother, Jonathan, dreamed up, and Christopher Nolan made for $5 million. “A movie is a movie,” he says. So he’s still scribbling new dialogue on the set, improvising camera moves as he goes, letting his actors decide when it’s time to move on and otherwise racing through each day as if his money might run out. It’s just that his jazz combo of a crew has mushroomed into a philharmonic — with whole new sections of prosthetics artists, special-effects wizards and so on. “But we’re still all riffing off of him,” Mr. Pfister says.

That kind of maestro is just what Warner Brothers wanted five years ago when it hired Mr. Nolan to restore a jewel of a property that had become a laughingstock with Joel Schumacher’s 1997 reviled “Batman and Robin,” best remembered for George Clooney’s nipple suit.

But any risks inherent in giving over such a huge franchise, with so much history and potential, to an auteur untested at making blockbusters were outweighed by the need to re-establish credibility with Batman’s alienated fan base. “If the people who make the film aren’t taking it seriously,” Mr. Nolan said, summarizing fans’ view of the 1997 movie, “why should we?”

Now the question is whether Mr. Nolan’s vision of Batman can not only maintain its hold on the imaginations of comic fans and critics, but expand its reach to a wider summer moviegoing audience, even as the death of Heath Ledger, who played the Joker in “The Dark Knight,” has added unanticipated morbidity to the film’s deliberate darkness.

But if Mr. Nolan was feeling any stress on the set in Chicago last year, his easygoing reserve concealed it. Dressed, as always, in his own somewhat formal uniform — dark blazer, waistcoat, French cuffs; a thermos of tea in hand; a wireless video monitor around his neck — he also seemed a bit of a throwback. While many filmmakers watch in seclusion on television screens, he stood next to the camera, always on his feet unless he was kneeling to whisper in someone’s ear. “Acting is such a vulnerable thing, you don’t want to be told in front of others that you’ve made a mistake, or ‘Try this,’ ” said Aaron Eckhart, who plays Harvey Dent, a district attorney. “Chris understands that.”

But then, it hasn’t been so long since Mr. Nolan bootstrapped himself into the film business, cobbling together bits of 16-millimeter film stock with $6,000 to make his first feature, “Following” (1998), over a year’s worth of weekends. “Memento,” which came next, was a critical smash, and with Steven Soderbergh’s endorsement, he landed his first studio assignment: directing Al Pacino and Hilary Swank in “Insomnia” (2002) on a $50 million budget.

That fall, after slaving over a screenplay about Howard Hughes only to have Martin Scorsese beat him to the punch, Mr. Nolan put together a passionate 45-minute pitch for rewinding the Batman saga to its beginning. Alan Horn, Warner’s president, approved it on the spot. “Besides his excitement about the story he wanted to tell, he just brings a certain weight and credibility,” said Jeff Robinov, the studio’s No. 2 executive, who had first tried to interest Mr. Nolan in “Troy.”

Three times the cost of “Insomnia” and far greater in scope, “Batman Begins” catapulted Mr. Nolan into the top tier of mainstream filmmakers. Critics mostly loved it, though some seemed to resent him for leaving the indie world behind. While not an overpowering blockbuster, with $205 million in domestic box office, it expanded the audience for Batman well beyond comic fans. And it gave Warner Brothers a superhero who could hold his head up next to Sony’s Spider-Man and Fox’s X-Men.

His Caped Crusader, Christian Bale (who also starred in Mr. Nolan’s entr’acte between the Batman films, “The Prestige”), recalls how “people would kind of laugh” when they heard that he and Mr. Nolan were taking Batman seriously. But when they finally saw the film, the same people “would say, ‘What a surprise,’ “ Mr. Bale said. “I believe that even the most popcornlike movie can be done incredibly well, and can have something that you really have to work at. That was what attracted me to doing it the first time, because I felt I’d never seen that done, and I didn’t understand why.”

It’s enough to make a marketing executive cringe, that the word “dense” pops up in conversations with Mr. Nolan and his actors. But it’s true: “The Dark Knight,” which will be released on July 18, is jammed with characters, plot and action. It picks up where “Batman Begins” left off, with Mr. Oldman’s police lieutenant, Jim Gordon, warning about the perils of escalation: that Batman’s extreme measures could invite a like response from the criminal element. And sure enough, a deadly new villain, the Joker, emerges to wreak havoc.

In a political context this would politely be called an “unintended consequence.” (Gotham as Baghdad, anyone?) Mr. Nolan doesn’t deny the overtones. “As we looked through the comics, there was this fascinating idea that Batman’s presence in Gotham actually attracts criminals to Gotham, attracts lunacy,” he said. “When you’re dealing with questionable notions like people taking the law into their own hands, you have to really ask, where does that lead? That’s what makes the character so dark, because he expresses a vengeful desire.”

In Mr. Bale’s view “The Dark Knight” is an even lonelier outing for his character, who once naïvely thought his crime fighting could be a finite endeavor. “This escalation has now meant that he feels more of a duty to continue,” he said. “And now you have not just a young man in pain attempting to find some kind of an answer, you have somebody who actually has power, who is burdened by that power, and is having to recognize the difference between attaining that power and holding on to it.”
Skip to next paragraph
Multimedia
Following NolanSlide Show
Following Nolan
Related
Filmography: Christopher Nolan Video Trailer: 'The Dark Knight' Video Clips: 'The Prestige' Video Clips: 'Batman Begins' Video Trailer: 'Insomnia' Video Trailer: 'Memento' Review: 'Following'

It may not be too much of a stretch to see another analogy here for Mr. Nolan: Rebooting the Batman franchise may be behind him, but he still has to improve upon it. Sequels are always trickier. And now he must also navigate the aftermath of the Jan. 22 death of Mr. Ledger.

It came well into editing, and only after the studio had introduced Mr. Ledger’s Joker through posters, trailers and a six-minute Imax short. But it automatically raised the stakes: the acclaimed actor’s final role would be ... a comic-book grotesque? Worse, though Mr. Ledger had finished work on “The Dark Knight” in October and was already halfway through another film, news that the prescription drugs that killed him included sleep aids — along with narcotics — prompted Internet chatter about whether his intense performance as the Joker, styled after Malcolm McDowell’s in “A Clockwork Orange,” had been a factor in his demise.

Mr. Ledger, however, also called it “the most fun I’ve ever had, or probably ever will have, playing a character.” But his fatigue was obvious, said Michael Caine, who briefly overlapped with him. “He was exhausted, I mean he was really tired. I remember saying to him, ‘I’m too old to have the bloody energy to play that part.’ And I thought to myself, I didn’t have the energy when I was his age.”

Mr. Pfister, the cinematographer, said Mr. Ledger seemed “like he was busting blood vessels in his head,” he was so intense. “It was like a séance, where the medium takes on another person and then is so completely drained.”

Will Mr. Ledger’s death cast a pall over “The Dark Knight,” whose tragic plot turns already make it much darker than “Batman Begins”? “We’ll see,” said Mr. Robinov, of Warner Brothers. Mr. Nolan, for his part, said he felt a “massive sense of responsibility” to do right by Mr. Ledger’s “terrifying, amazing” performance.

“It’s stunning, it’s iconic,” he said. “It’s going to just blow people away.”

All the talk of darkness obscures what may come as an aesthetic surprise in “The Dark Knight”: the creepy shadows and gothic Wayne Manor are gone, replaced by sleek towers, shiny surfaces, bright lighting and the vistas of a city with shoulders bigger than Batman’s. “I’ve tried to unclutter the Gotham we created on the last film,” said Nathan Crowley, Mr. Nolan’s production designer. “Gotham is in chaos. We keep blowing up stuff. So we can keep our images clean,” setting a solitary hero against the vastness of Chicago.

Mr. Nolan said he tried to make “Batman Begins” realistic by taking Wayne out of Gotham for portions of the story. For “The Dark Knight” he wanted Gotham to seem straight out of the news. “We just let everyone know up front: this is a location movie,” he said.

Mr. Nolan does his planning in his own tricked-out lair: a converted garage behind his home near the Hollywood hills (and just down the street from the Batcave entrance in the campy 1960s television series). There he and his producer-wife, Emma Thomas — who gave birth to their fourth child last September — gathered with Mr. Crowley, Mr. Pfister, the costume designer Lindy Hemming and other department heads to brainstorm. It’s where Mr. Crowley designed the tanklike Batmobile known as “the Tumbler,” where Ms. Hemming came up with a uniform that finally let Mr. Bale turn his head at the neck and where she first pitched the idea of the Joker as Johnny Rotten.

If he barely uses storyboards, let alone the computer-animated “previsualization” wizardry common to effects-heavy films, Mr. Nolan is on the cutting edge with one technology. He used the unwieldy Imax cameras to shoot about 30 minutes of “The Dark Knight,” including the entire opening.

“We’ve been trying to talk filmmakers into doing this for nearly 40 years,” said David Keighley, an old Imax hand. And even after a Steadicam collapsed under the weight of an Imax camera, Mr. Nolan held firm. “If David Lean could carry a 65-millimeter camera through the desert,” he said, “why shouldn’t we be able to do this?”

“It scares people a bit,” Mr. Nolan says of what could be called his planned-out impulsiveness. “We just go and shoot the stuff, and see what looks the best and what works. But on a big movie, you actually have more freedom. You can say, ‘O.K., it’s 3 in the morning — can we get the police to close down that street?"


[hr]

[/align][/spoil]


Post Posted: March 18th 2008 7:29 pm
 

Join: December 30th 2004 7:13 am
Posts: 223
Two interviews from EW regarding the Dark Knight

'Dark Knight' Director: My Responsibility to Heath Ledger

http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20184781,00.html
[spoil][align=left]'Dark Knight' Director: My Responsibility to Heath Ledger
At ShoWest, Christopher Nolan explains how working to finish the new Batman movie helped him deal with the actor's death

'I felt very lucky to have something to do,'' says director Christopher Nolan, when talking about the sudden death of Heath Ledger, who plays the Joker in his upcoming Batman movie The Dark Knight (opening July 18). ''I felt an enormous amount of responsibility to him.''

For months now, Nolan has been working to finish his film — something that he says has allowed him to better cope with the abrupt loss of his friend and colleague. Movie-industry dignitaries who attended the annual ShoWest convention in Las Vegas last Thursday got an early glimpse at what the filmmaker has created. Nolan presented a brief scene from the beginning of the movie, in which a group of thieves rob a bank wearing Joker masks and unleashing a startling amount of carnage. It was enough to pique Bat-appetites, but, without any extended look at Ledger's performance, it didn't answer many lingering questions. So when EW.com caught up with Nolan later, we asked him how the tragedy affected the movie, as well as what's next for him and the Batman franchise.

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: Where are you now in the post-production process on the film?
CHRISTOPHER NOLAN: I just finished my first cut, showed it to the studio last Friday. It's pretty exciting, actually: It's always one of those pretty nervy occasions, and it was really kind of fun.

Have you had the opportunity to take a moment and grieve for Heath Ledger?
Not really.

Sometimes they say that being able to work through tragedy helps you deal with it.
For me, for my process, just working straight through it and wrestling through it and working was actually — I felt very lucky to have something to do. Because for most of the people who knew him far better than I did, who were around him, it was very difficult for his family and everyone. I was very fortunate: I had something very specific to be getting on with — I felt an enormous amount of responsibility to him. So I've really had something to be doing. You always feel a sort of responsibility to an actor that you've clicked with and seen him do something great for you on set. As a director, you can really screw that up in the end; there's no two ways about that. So [I've been focused on] just getting on with trying to preserve the great performance that I knew he had given us.

Have you had to change a lot or do much differently?
No, not at all. You know, he was very proud of what he had done. [His interpretation of the Joker is] very much a character, an iconic character, and very much not [Heath]. So to watch it is actually enthralling and captivating and exciting — all those positive things. I know how proud he was of the part and I'm actually very, very excited to show it to people and have them see it.

When you presented footage from the film at ShoWest, you said that when Batman Begins came out in 2005 you were surprised to have won converts to the franchise — in many ways, I'm one of them. It was not a movie that I was expecting to enjoy.
That's the comment I've most frequently heard about the movie, very often from women: ''I did not expect to enjoy this. It is not the kind of film I normally enjoy. But I really loved it.'' And I was very blown away by that, because that was beyond my wildest expectations for the movie. I figured, Maybe we please the fans or we please the critics or maybe we please the general public — to kind of get all three, more or less, that was something that I never really expected.

People always use the phrase ''raising the bar'' — were there goals you set for yourself on this movie that you were trying to meet?
Yeah, very much. I'd never done a sequel — kind of never imagined I would; it's not something I had really seen myself doing. Even, on completing the first one, it has a great tease for the Joker, but I just wanted to send the audience out with a sense of possibility for what we might see, not specifically as a sequel. It took me a long time to come around, talking to [Batman Begins cowriter] David Goyer and Jonathan, my brother [and frequent collaborator], to figure out that, actually, there's something very compelling there. So what I've tried to do with this film, the only reason was to try and make the best film in the first place. And the great sequels that I've enjoyed and looked up to over the years have managed to do that — there aren't many of them. You know, whether you're looking at The Godfather Part II or The Empire Strikes Back — those are sequels that I think built on what the first ones did really amazingly well. And that's what we're aspiring to with this film.

Will there be another Batman movie?
I have no clue, I mean, I just...

Well, but you leave it open at the end of this one for there to be another one.
[Conspiratorially] Do we? How do you know?

One of your actors might have mentioned it.
[Laughs] Oh really? [Laughs]

Or hinted at it.
Well, he hasn't seen the film. [Laughs] The ending of the film is, we're trying for a similar sense of excitement that we had with the first film. But for me it's always about this movie. It's always about: I want people, when the credits come on this movie, I want their heads just spinning with excitement about what this thing we've seen was and what it might be. But it's very specific to this movie. Without sounding pretentious about it, I really do try and put everything I've got into the film I'm making at any one time, and, you know, see what's left in the end. [Chuckles][/align][/spoil]

Christian Bale: Up for a Third 'Batman' Movie?

http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20184780,00.html
[spoil][align=left]Christian Bale: Up for a Third 'Batman' Movie?

''I would like very much to complete a trilogy,'' the actor tells EW.com at ShoWest. Plus: his reaction to seeing Heath Ledger footage

CHRISTIAN BALE ''It gave me goose bumps throughout, looking at Heath [Ledger] up there. And I just hope that this [movie] can celebrate him, celebrate his work''

Christian Bale may move seamlessly between genres better than any actor around, but you can be sure he loves doing the big blockbusters as much as artier fare like last year's I'm Not There and Rescue Dawn. Take Batman, the franchise that he reinvented with director Christopher Nolan in 2005's Batman Begins and returns to on July 18 in The Dark Knight. The Caped Crusader films may be loaded with special effects and based on comic books, but when EW.com caught up with the actor last week at the ShoWest convention in Las Vegas (where footage of the film was shown), he sounded as jazzed as ever about playing the part. And then he dropped this little Bat-bomb: ''Knowing the Dark Knight story, I would like very much to complete a trilogy.''

Whoa. So does that mean that this sequel leaves the door open for another movie? Would they really do it? In a wide-ranging interview, Bale talked about why he returned to the world of Batman, what it was like to work with his late costar Heath Ledger, his plans to do a similar franchise reboot with The Terminator, and where he wants to go from here.

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: What brought you back to the part of Batman? Was there something that you didn't get to do in the first one that you were looking forward to doing this time around?
CHRISTIAN BALE: Well, what we didn't get to do was show this man who has now matured, who no longer has the naïveté that he had at a younger age — now it's somebody who has caused change, who has achieved what he had set out to do, but is now seeing consequences that he hadn't anticipated. So it's now somebody with the burden of his power — the difference between the man trying to attain that and the man who finds himself with it, and how very different it is.

Do you feel like the character has changed? Isn't that something that, as an actor, amidst all the effects and everything, you look for?
Yeah, of course, of course. It's one of the major [reasons] I like working with Chris [Nolan].... We manage to have all of the interest that I need as an actor, as well as what you said — what did you say, explosions and stuff?

Yeah.
Yeah, in the midst of that. Chris completely understands that explosions and effects don't make a movie. That ain't a story right there, those are spectacles within the story, but that doesn't make a good movie.

So do you think there will be a part 3 of Batman?
Um, look, let's wait and see...

Or, I guess it'd be part 7.
No, no, no, no, no. [Smiling] Part 3 is what I'd consider it, yeah, I don't say part 7. Batman begins — that was the beginning there, with all due respect to the others. We are re-creating this. You know, obviously the decision is out of my hands. I would, knowing the Dark Knight story, I would like very much to complete a trilogy. And I think that knowing the story of The Dark Knight, it leaves you anticipating something that really can get very, very interesting for a third. Now, the question would be: Is Chris going to be doing it? Because to me I find it tricky to imagine working on it without it being a collaboration with Chris.

Back to The Dark Knight: Can you talk a little bit about what it was like to work with Heath Ledger?
Yeah, I'm absolutely fine talking about him. You know, I don't like kind of trivializing the tragedy in conjunction with an interview to do with the movie, which is clearly far less important. But Heath was a joy. He really was like that, because he was a very unique man. I enjoyed watching him work, working with him — you know, we had a lot of the old gang from the first one together, and then there were new members, Heath obviously included. What was so great to see with Heath is just how seriously he took it. And we don't mean in any way to sound sort of pretentious with that, but just in the fact that if we don't take it seriously, then how can any audience ever take it seriously? And he did one hell of a job. You know, you were out there [at the Warner Bros. presentation earlier in the day] — you saw those clips?

That was my first time, yeah.
That was the first time I'd seen it as well — and it's wonderful, it's fantastic, and, you know, it gave me goose bumps throughout, looking at Heath up there. And I just hope that this can celebrate him, celebrate his work.

ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY: Where are you in the Terminator process right now?
CHRISTIAN BALE: There are some wonderful people who have been brought in, and we are working to re-create that world.

Do you have a script?
We're in the process of doing that, we're working on that, et cetera.

Do you have a sense of when Terminator is going to start or how long it's going to take?
I got a sense of it, but, you know, it's important to make sure that you start a movie when you're ready, instead of just starting it on a date, regardless. And so we'll start when we're ready.

In the meantime, you're working on Michael Mann's Depression-era gangster saga Public Enemies.
Yes, yes, that's actually what I'm doing right now.... I don't actually start until next week, but so far, just loving it, loving working with Michael, the research, the detail, liking it very much.

How do you feel about the way people discuss the projects you pick? You've always done a mix of genres and movies — in the past year or so, for example, you did a Western [3:10 to Yuma], you worked with Werner Herzog [on Rescue Dawn] — but people sometimes focus on the blockbusters. Does that frustrate you?
I certainly don't do that for anybody but myself. I enjoy making all sorts, and it's directors who I very much like working with. I don't really give a damn if it's a low-budget movie or if it's a big-budget movie — it's whatever serves the movie and serves the story best. I certainly enjoy watching both of those kinds of movies, so why don't I go out there and make both? I don't really understand why I'd have any frustration whatsoever. What? Frustration that people can't say, ''Well, you're predictable as hell, aren't you? You just do the big studio ones. You just do the indie ones''? You know? That would be frustrating.

Is there a different mindset that goes into making different kinds of movies?
Listen, I think that there probably is, but I don't really try to articulate that to myself. Because I do think that a story is a story, and I will see many low, low-budget movies that just are way better than some mega-budget movie. So a story's a story, and I'm going to be interested in a story that I want to go see. And I've made mistakes in the past. I hope that that has given me experience, and hopefully I'll make fewer mistakes in the future.

But you had a good time doing the work...
[Smiles] Um, not always! [Laughs]

Don't you seek having a good time at least, or some sort of edification?
Well, that's a funny thing. Everybody considers enjoyment in different ways. Some people would consider ''Hey, every day was a blast on the set, we all got along and went out drinking together after'' [as enjoyable]. And, hey, that can be fun. But also I get a lot of satisfaction out of just nonstop work.... Actually, that gives me the most satisfaction, because I'm setting aside time to work on a movie. I don't necessarily want my life to be the same as it is when I'm not working. I don't really feel the need for hanging out too much or whatever; I enjoy taking it very seriously. And I absolutely can see the ridiculous side of that as well, because, you know, the majority of jobs are ridiculous. [His interviewer raises his hand, jokingly] Exactly! [He raises his hand and smiles] Both of our hands are up in that. But you have to recognize that and say, ''Regardless, I'm telling a story and I take that seriously, and I enjoy that immensely.'' So, to me, that is having fun, when I'm working my ass off. And ultimately, when I'm finished, then I'm really going to enjoy myself in life, because I've actually been satisfied in my work. I mean, if I've done something that I've felt hasn't really worked or that I haven't really had to work at, then I can't enjoy my free time as much because I'm feeling like I have to go answer to myself why the last thing may or may not have gone so well. And I've been very fortunate with directors — literally, in the last five years or so, really fantastic collaborations with people — so I've had that satisfaction for quite some time.

I know — you've got Michael Mann now, you worked with Terrence Malick... You're running out of the big guys.
Well, you know, hopefully...

There'll be new ones, another Christopher Nolan comes along...
Absolutely, Christopher Nolan is a new director who will be around for many years to come, I truly think. He's one of the finest out there. Also, you can revisit working with these same people — hopefully it ain't just a one-time deal and that's the end. I worked with Todd Haynes a couple of times [on Velvet Goldmine and I'm Not There] and enjoyed that. I very much like collaborating with Brad Anderson [on The Machinist], and we're kind of looking to do something else together. Jim Mangold [his 3:10 to Yuma director] as well. It's been very nice. I've been a lucky bastard.[/align][/spoil]


Post Posted: March 19th 2008 4:48 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
Kevin Conroy was just confirmed as Batman in Gotham Knight! :heavymetal:


Post Posted: March 21st 2008 12:45 am
 
User avatar

Join: September 15th 2006 11:25 pm
Posts: 136
Image

It's this shot that has totally sold me on Ledger's Joker. It's almost like seeing a real life version of the animated series Joker.


Post Posted: March 24th 2008 10:38 pm
 

Join: April 25th 2004 8:34 pm
Posts: 577
The suit looks pretty fuckin kickass there as well. No problems for me at ALL with it. Looks realistically armored and stuff. Also can't wait for this interrogation scene either. Looks like it'll be Batman as Bauer Meets Joker


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 14  Next



Jump to:  




millenniumfalcon.com©
phpBB©