It is currently May 1st 2025 6:35 pm




  Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14  Next
Post Posted: August 1st 2006 2:18 am
 

Join: February 17th 2005 9:54 am
Posts: 254
Batman Begins II

http://www.batman-on-film.com/
http://www.batman-on-film.com/batmovienews.html

[hr]
    Ledger confirmed and it's called THE DARK KNIGHT!

    Author: Jett

    Monday, July 31, 2006 - 5:46 AM, 8:24 PM, 10:32 PM CENTRAL TIME: I can now "officially" confirm that Heath Ledger will indeed be The Joker in the next Batman film (which was broke LATINO REVIEW by originally) and it will be titled THE DARK KNIGHT (per Warner Bros.). Take it to the bank boys, it’ll be in the trades tomorrow and we'll have the official annoucement here at BOF. Oh, and another friendly reminder to the "Bat-Powers That Be" to make sure THE DARK KNIGHT has a strong presence at Comic Con next summer...

    A note for you BOF'ers: Guess which title choice won a previous "Bat-Poll" with 1,798 votes and 44% of all cast? You got it, THE DARK KNIGHT...

    This comes in from one of my best sources who previously gave up the scoop Katie Holmes and Ken Watanabe's casting in BEGINS, as well as confirming an offer had made to Ledger). Here goes:

    As you have long suspected, the two main villains in the BATMAN BEGINS sequel will be The Joker and The Penquin.

    I can confirm (as I did a few weeks ago) that while an offer has been made to Heath Ledger, Ledger has not signed any deal, and is reluctant to do so (at the moment.) Ledger is not a lock.

    It seems Nolan has been listening to you guys when it comes to casting his other villain, however. I can confirm that an offer has been made to Phillip Seymour Hoffman for the role. Yet Hoffman has indicated that he may not get involved in the sequel.

    So the scuttlebutt long reported by BOF that The Penguin will be in the sequel looks like it could be true (The rumor is that he'll be a British arms dealer/mob boss with designs on Gotham).

    UPDATED: WB has confirmed to BOF that Ledger has indeed been cast as The Joker in the next Bat-film -- THE DARK KNIGHT.

[hr]


Post Posted: August 1st 2006 3:18 am
 
User avatar

Join: November 14th 2003 6:06 am
Posts: 818
I like the title so long as it's 'Batman: The Dark Knight' as opposed to just 'The Dark Knight.'

But the casting of Ledger is horrible, just terrible. You've got Bettany out there and you've got Buscemi. And yet this, this is what we get? :roll:

The only saving grace is that it's not Depp. Thank the heavens.


Post Posted: August 1st 2006 7:09 am
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
I like it. I love it being called "The Dark Knight". I don't need to be told it is Batman (people who don't understand should be able to tell when they see the trailers; if they don't get it then, they probably didn't get the first movie either).

Heath Ledger doesn't bother me. Since I have never really seen him play a villain (to my knowledge, he hasn't played one), I think there is a lot he could do with the role. Chris Nolan hasn't made a bad move with this franchise yet and, just like Raimi, until he does I'm not going to second guess him.


Post Posted: August 4th 2006 12:10 am
 

Join: April 30th 2005 9:16 pm
Posts: 25
I wish people wouldn't despise Heath Ledger, I mean, sure he played in Brokeback Mountain, but does that make him a bad actor?


Post Posted: August 4th 2006 2:36 am
 

Join: April 28th 2005 2:18 am
Posts: 154
Location: Dallas
Hiring Ledger on is a means of free publicity as everyone will be talking about him


Post Posted: August 5th 2006 11:53 am
 

Join: September 20th 2004 6:33 pm
Posts: 376
Location: Southern California
or chris nolan thinks he's right for the part, which is probably very true.

anyone who discriminates against ledger or gyllenhaal as actors for staring in brokeback mountain are ignorant assholes.


Post Posted: August 6th 2006 4:57 am
 
User avatar

Join: November 14th 2003 6:06 am
Posts: 818
As unbelievable as it sounds, Ledger might not be the worst thing about the sequel. :what:

There are some rumors going around that Ryan Phillippe might play Harvey Dent.

Yep, you read it right. It's Reese Witherspoon's arm candy/hubby/bad actor.


Post Posted: August 6th 2006 8:15 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 22nd 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1493
Location: Deep Space Nine
Longtime_Sunshine wrote:
anyone who discriminates against ledger or gyllenhaal as actors for staring in brokeback mountain are ignorant assholes.


What if we discriminate against Ledger for every other turd he's starred in?


Post Posted: August 6th 2006 8:28 am
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
ETAndElliot4Ever wrote:

What if we discriminate against Ledger for every other turd he's starred in?


This is very true. Especially the movie about the Knight who wears Nike armor and dances to modern music in the 16th Century or something. That was pure shit. Still can't believe Paul Bettany was involved in that shit.


Post Posted: August 6th 2006 10:34 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
Ledger is a horrible cast. Nothing about him works.

I can't picture him in the role in any capacity.


Post Posted: August 6th 2006 1:17 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
I can't wait until the script leaks.

Obi-Wan Starkiller wrote:
Chris Nolan hasn't made a bad move with this franchise yet and, just like Raimi, until he does I'm not going to second guess him.

I agree.


Image

Image


Post Posted: August 9th 2006 4:39 am
 
User avatar

Join: November 14th 2003 6:06 am
Posts: 818
I have two words for that:

Katie Holmes

Was she terrible? No. Were there better choices out there? Absolutely.
______________________________

A couple of the Ledger manips that are making the rounds.

ImageImage


Post Posted: August 9th 2006 5:25 am
 

Join: April 1st 2005 4:48 pm
Posts: 39
Well I won't say Nolan has made only good choices since I hate Katie Holmes and her mongoose face, but I definitely love the direction the franchise has taken since he got on board. I am not going to say "this actor's performance will be crap" as long as I haven't seen the movie, and I remain optimistic. And frankly, we all know an actor's performance greatly depends on who's directing them. I haven't seen a single Ledger movie, I don't know him, but he may be a very good Joker. For now anyway, he looks more faithful to the DC Joker than Nicholson (age, height, little details like those, but it all counts in the general picture. Though I'd say he should lose a little weight for this part, based on pictures I've seen so far. His face looks a bit too stuffed).

I think a lot of people are making a mistake (not talking about these boards, but in a general way). They all think that "It's going to be impossible to be as good as/better than Nicholson". Well people, it's certainly going to be hard to be a better actor than him, but as far as his portrayal of the Joker is concerned, I don't get it. He was good, but that was all, nothing that can't be beaten. First of all, he was the Burton's Joker, and that changes a lot. I think the guy portraying the Joker has everything on his side to deliver a performance that will completely renew the character : a good director, an atmosphere closer to the comics than ever, other good actors interacting with him

I don't want to see Nicholson Joker II, I want to see something else, something better, and I say it's definitely possible.

Now on an unrelated side note, I don't really like the fact that Penguin may be involved in the movie as well. I think the Joker should completely steal Batman's attention and no lesser enemy should interfere. Or perhaps Scarecrow as a sidekick, since his fate after B.B is undetermined.


Post Posted: August 9th 2006 7:08 am
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
I'm not really sure what Nolan has in store for the Batman villains. I mean, Scarecrow could kind of get away with looking weird because he uses a drug to get the desired fright from his enemies. Ra's Al Ghul can be played as just a regular guy with extraordinary fighting abilities. So really Batman Begins villains were based in reality. What will Nolan do with the Joker or the Penguin (if he is in this movie)? Will Nolan put white makeup on Ledger and turn his hair green and wear purple clothes? Or will he give him a normal appearance but with psychotic tendencies? Will the penguin look like Danny DeVito in 'Returns' or will he just be some kind of mob boss who is fat and short? So far, Nolan has based everything (for the most part) in reality. I don't know if he will go so far as to make the villains look like freaks. Just a thought....

Anyway, about Holmes. I'm not sure what Nolan thought about putting her in the movie before Tom Cruise dipshit came along, but I'm sure he regretted it after the fact.


Post Posted: August 9th 2006 8:58 am
 
Fat Bastard

Join: September 27th 2005 8:01 pm
Posts: 1550
Location: In hell
Everything at this point for the film is pure speculation. Don't get me wrong it's cool to speculate, I'm just saying we should wait for the film to come out.

By the way I think Ledger looks pretty cool with the make up for the Joker.

I to have never seen any films with Ledger in it so I can't judge him and I won't be seeing Brokeback Mountain any time soon.


Post Posted: August 17th 2006 10:59 pm
 
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
User avatar

Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm
Posts: 4265
uh oh Philipe as Two Face with talk of The Penguin.

Joker, Two-Face, and now Peguin.

http://imdb.com/news/wenn/2006-08-16
    Ryan Phillippe may be set to take over from Tommy Lee Jones after reportedly landing the role of Harvey Dent/Two-Face in the upcoming Batman Begins sequel. Reese Witherspoon's husband will join Heath Ledger, who has signed on to play The Joker, and new Batman Christian Bale in The Dark Knight.

    Crash star Phillippe beat Liev Shreiber and Josh Lucas to the role of the scheming district attorney, played by Jones in 1995 movie Batman Forever, according to internet reports.

    Academy Award winners Sir Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman have also joined the cast, while fellow Oscar winner Philip Seymour Hoffman is in talks to play The Penguin in the new film.


Post Posted: August 17th 2006 11:13 pm
 
User avatar

Join: November 14th 2003 6:06 am
Posts: 818
Ugh!

This is bad mojo.

The last thing this needs is three villains, maybe four if we count Scarecrow. I hope they don't let that whole arc drift away without resolution.

I'd love to see the sequel's opening sequence be Scarecrow running from Batman in the Narrows. The Batman falls behind in the chase only to come upon a dead Scarecrow with a playing card of a Joker on his chest.

And we need to find out why Nolan can't get his boy Guy Pierce to play Dent.


Post Posted: August 18th 2006 10:10 am
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
Well, we don't know how significant the role of Harvey Dent will be in this movie. They might just be throwing in a cameo to say "Hey! Look! It's Two-Face! Yeah, he'll be in the next movie!" or something like that. Same with Penguin. Might just show up at the end or something. Warners knows better after Forever and Batman and Robin to be throwing 2 or 3 at a time for no reason.


Post Posted: August 18th 2006 5:49 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
I don’t have a problem with an abundance of villains. The comic books and animated series’ have both dealt successfully with these types of scenarios. Hell, one of my favorite books is Arkham Asylum: A Serious House on Serious Earth and it featured a number of Bat villains.

Image

Image


Post Posted: August 18th 2006 8:26 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
Remember, one of the main comics Batman Begins relied on for inspiration was The Long Halloween. It was packed with villains and remains one of the best Batman stories ever told. I wouldn't expect Dent to become Two-Face in this next movie. He was a good friend of Gordon's AND Bruce and his character needs time to bond with the both of them to be correct. They really should have included Dent in Batman Begins as maybe the assistant DA.


Post Posted: August 18th 2006 10:37 pm
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
Any assistant DA is better than Katie Holmes. Especially after getting knocked up by Xenu Cruise.


Post Posted: August 19th 2006 12:03 am
 
User avatar

Join: January 29th 2004 7:10 pm
Posts: 425
Darth Hade wrote:
A couple of the Ledger manips that are making the rounds.

ImageImage


Someone needs to do up this one:

Image


Post Posted: August 19th 2006 2:23 am
 
User avatar

Join: August 18th 2006 2:46 am
Posts: 214
Location: Unknown
Regardless of who is gonna play the Joker, it gonna be hard to do better than Jack's performance back in 89.


Post Posted: August 19th 2006 2:53 am
 
User avatar

Join: November 14th 2003 6:06 am
Posts: 818
Quote:
"The next one would have Batman enlisting the aid of Gordon and Dent in bringing down The Joker... but not killing him. In the third [movie], The Joker would go on trial, scarring Dent in the process." - David S. Goyer, BATMAN BEGINS screenwriter, 2005


Interesting.

Quote:
"I want to see The Joker, because I think it will be a very different kind of Joker than people have seen before, I think even the card that you see at the end of (BEGINS) shows that it is a darker, more sinister-looking Joker than anything I have seen depicted before. I think it would be a good adversary." - Christian Bale, 2005

Agree 100%, Mr. Bale.
Quote:
"Like BEGINS, one clear cut villain isn't the plan. The studio isn't interested in Robin. We're not either." - Christopher Nolan, BATMAN BEGINS director, 2005

I love you, Chris.


Post Posted: August 20th 2006 7:33 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
How's this?

Image


Post Posted: August 20th 2006 11:18 pm
 
User avatar

Join: January 29th 2004 7:10 pm
Posts: 425
nice! :heavymetal:


Post Posted: August 21st 2006 10:03 am
 

Join: March 21st 2004 7:11 am
Posts: 124
Streen wrote:
Regardless of who is gonna play the Joker, it gonna be hard to do better than Jack's performance back in 89.


As a kid I might have agreed with you, but since then Jack's performance has grated with me. He fit with the general feeling of Burton's world but it was not the Joker, just as in the end Keaton wasn't really Batman (though he was a great Wayne).

I think that Ledger can do it, and Nolan would be the one to bring it out. He'd have to loose a little of the "Hollywood" muscle he's put on, but he looks good enough for the role to be believable. As does Phillipe. He's got looks that are on par with Bale's which is fitting as they are supposed to be two of the upper echaeleon of Gotham society, and showed he can do a decent manipulative turn in Cruel Intentions all those years ago.


Post Posted: August 23rd 2006 9:21 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
New interview from Nolan.

Quote:
Q: Batman Begins dealt with a range of themes from revenge to how we confront fear. What themes will you be exploring in The Dark Knight?

Nolan: I suppose in loose terms I can say it’s about things having to get worse before they get better.


Q: It’s that note the first film ends on of escalation?

Nolan: Very much.


Q: : Is there anything to be inferred from the name you’ve chosen for this film, The Dark Knight?

Nolan: Ultimately yes. [Laughs] But I’ll leave that for people to infer.


Q: This is the cryptic portion of our chat.

Nolan: Yeah. [Laughs] The title has been chosen very specifically. It’s quite important to the film.


Q: I take it [the Joker] will be less Cesar Romero and Jack Nicholson than the Joker we saw portrayed in a comic like The Killing Joke?

Nolan: Yes. I would certainly point to The Killing Joke but I also would point very much to the first two appearances of the Joker in the comic. If you look at where the Joker comes from there’s a very clear direction that fits what we’re doing very well.

Here is a link to an article on the Joker, which includes a detailed account of his first appearance in Batman #1. I find this item interesting:

Quote:
In the Joker’s first appearance, he’s not quite the wacky loon he would become in later appearances; however, he’s murderous as ever.

On this board, a user descibes the story of Batman #2 (where the Joker makes his second appearance):

Quote:
[The Joker Meets the Cat-Woman] by Bill Finger, Bob Kane and inks and backgrounds by Jerry Robinson and George Roussos. The Joker lives and is abducted from a hospital by a gang so he can be their leader. The gang plans to steal "The Pharoh's gems." Unfortunately so does Cat-woman, pitting the two villains against each other and Batman. Bats, of course comes out on top with Joker recaptured and Cat-woman leaping to a death/escape from the Batplane. An interesting story, but the art on this story left much to be desired. Random Thoughts: Batman plans to abduct The Joker himself and have a doctor operate on his brain to "cure" him. Bats again allows Cat-woman free reign to escape. The Joker, ever unpredictable, poisons that gang that took him out of police custody.


Post Posted: August 23rd 2006 10:25 pm
 
Bush Pilot
User avatar

Join: March 23rd 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 1483
I think it would be cool to see a more serious, badass Joker. Even when I was a kid, he was always my least favorite villain because he seemed so cartoony.

And Bearvomit - that pic is just creepy.


Post Posted: August 30th 2006 12:38 pm
 
User avatar

Join: April 1st 2004 3:56 pm
Posts: 248
Location: London, UK
Dingo is right in suggesting that the TV/film versions of The Joker are rather distant from the comic book villian. Jack was an awesome character in the original Batman, and gave every line with a slick delivery.

The I-made-you, you-made-me circular theme in the original Batman worked very well, however I'm glad that they are moving away from that with the return of the Joker. I think Ledger will work well as something totally different, but extremely effective.




Oh, and if anyone is interested, as far as I am aware I won't be on set of this movie, so no sneaky set shots :(


Post Posted: August 30th 2006 4:35 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
Wait till they get a load of me!

Image


Post Posted: August 30th 2006 5:40 pm
 

Join: February 17th 2005 9:54 am
Posts: 254
http://www.latinoreview.com/news.php?id=915

LatinoReview was promising a script review. Still havent seen anything about that materializing.

In any case keep an eye out for the actual TDK script, who knows we could get lucky it leaks out like it did with BB :monocle:


Post Posted: September 12th 2006 9:07 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
Quick blurb from Ledger:
Quote:
"It's definitely going to stump people. I think it'll be more along the lines of how the Joker was meant to be in the comics, darker and more sinister."

"I wouldn't have thought of me, either. But it's obviously not going to be what Jack Nicholson did. It's going to be more nuanced and dark and more along the lines of a Clockwork Orange kind of feel. Which is, I think, what the comic book was after: less about his laugh and more about his eyes."

Image


Post Posted: October 21st 2006 8:19 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
Per a Newsarama interview, Jerry Robinson may be a consultant on The Dark Knight. Robinson came up with the concept design for the Joker.
Quote:
Q: What do you think of the Batman movies?

Robinson: I was more impressed with the last one [Batman Begins] than the others. I didn’t care for most of the others, mostly the writing and not necessarily the acting. I hope the next one [The Dark Knight] will be good. I might be acting as a consultant on that.

Q: Oh really?

Robinson: Possibly. That’s being discussed. So if that’s true, then I hope it’ll be the best one.


Post Posted: January 26th 2007 6:52 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
latino review story

Harvey Dent is in. Katie Holmes is out but the character is still in. Oswald Cobblepot / Penguin is out. Matt Damon PASSED on playing Dent, would've been epic. Josh Lucas, Jamie Foxx, and ED NORTON are being considered for Dent.


Post Posted: January 26th 2007 8:02 pm
 
User avatar

Title: Mortician
Join: May 26th 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 1923
Location: Progress City
Katie Holmes is busy doing the Stepford Wives reality tv show, isn't she? When is that coming out (of the closet XD) I wonder.


Post Posted: January 27th 2007 2:23 am
 
User avatar

Join: November 14th 2003 6:06 am
Posts: 818
Personally, I'm glad Damon won't be in this thing. Can't stand him. Norton can do it...and he should take it.

Foxx is a horrible choice.

But the Holmes thing bothers me. I hate recasting. If her part is that small, I say write her out. Don't recast for a part that is smaller than bird shit anyway. That's ridiculous.


Post Posted: January 27th 2007 7:25 am
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
I say very first sceen of the film, super impose Katie's face on a body double, and have the Joker blow her up. That takes care of it! Then again, does that make Joker a villain or hero? Who would we root for in this film?!?!?!


Post Posted: February 6th 2007 8:02 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
Per latinoreview.com, Aaron Eckhart is currently first in line for Harvey Dent. Considering that he has extensive range, I think this would be a great choice. He can play good, bad, and several shades in between. Watch Thank You for Smoking or In the Company of Men and you’ll see what I mean.

Image

The site also states that Maggie Gyllenhaal, Rachel McAdams, and Emily Blunt are all in the running for Rachael Dawes.


Post Posted: February 6th 2007 8:51 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
Image


Post Posted: February 6th 2007 11:12 pm
 
I am Jack's bowel cancer

Join: May 2nd 2005 4:19 pm
Posts: 444
Location: NorCal
Eckhart is a fantastic choice, second only to Norton imo. I agree with the Katie Holmes thing, if her part is that small, write her out of the script. They should have known that there were going to be multiple sequels and signed said characters up for at least 2 or 3. That would have been planning ahead. But it is what it is, write her out, but make it believable.


Post Posted: February 8th 2007 12:30 am
 
User avatar

Join: November 14th 2003 6:06 am
Posts: 818
hypertext wrote:
Eckhart is a fantastic choice, second only to Norton imo.


Ditto. Eckhart is an underrated talent. And he won't "ham it up" either. An excellent choice.

Now let's just hope they rethink the whole Rachel thing.


Post Posted: February 8th 2007 9:15 am
 
User avatar

Title: Mortician
Join: May 26th 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 1923
Location: Progress City
He bugged the fuck out of me in The Core, though. 99% of his performance was okay, but the scene where he "emotes" about his buddy getting shut out of the airlock makes me cringe. That said, he should make a decent Dent, as long as there isn't any "Hilary Skank makes me cry" scene in this.


Post Posted: February 15th 2007 9:52 pm
 

Join: May 21st 2006 8:13 pm
Posts: 122
Aaron Eckhart is playing Harvey Dent/Two-Face.

http://www.variety.com/article/VR111795 ... id=13&cs=1


Post Posted: February 16th 2007 12:51 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
Image


Post Posted: February 22nd 2007 6:23 am
 

Join: February 17th 2005 9:54 am
Posts: 254
i'm pretty happy with Eckhart as Harvey Dent/ Two Face, i know he'll do a good job.

i'm just waiting for them to confirm Maggie Gylenhaal as Holme's replacement and we're good to go.


Post Posted: February 27th 2007 6:44 pm
 
I am Jack's bowel cancer

Join: May 2nd 2005 4:19 pm
Posts: 444
Location: NorCal
From IGN: Eckhart talks about being Two Face, but not for the Dark Knight...

Quote:
February 26, 2007 - Now that Aaron Eckhart has been cast as Gotham City district attorney Harvey Dent, a.k.a. Two-Face, in The Dark Knight, the actor is expressing his enthusiasm for the project.

"Batman is a complex character, and Two-Face comes a little bit from the same world," Eckhart told MTV.com. "But [at the same time] he's apart from it. ... I'm looking for the tension between the two, the similarities between the two."

He added, "I want to find what's similar to Batman and then find what's opposite to him."

Eckhart confirmed that he will only play Dent in Dark Knight but will portray Two-Face in the next Bat-film. He would not, however, comment on the rumor that The Joker (Heath Ledger) is responsible for Dent's scarring and transformation from good guy to bad.

The thesp added that he will film his scenes in both London and Chicago.


http://movies.ign.com/articles/767/767839p1.html

So does this mean that the Joker is the only villain for the next movie??


Post Posted: February 28th 2007 2:21 pm
 

Join: February 17th 2005 9:54 am
Posts: 254
well it is The Joker, he gotta have all the attention y'know ;)

but there should be an interesting subplot with Harvey Dent, if all goes to plan he will be our villain for Batman 3, and TDK has got to set that up.


Post Posted: February 28th 2007 4:41 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 22nd 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1493
Location: Deep Space Nine
hypertext wrote:
So does this mean that the Joker is the only villain for the next movie??


Hopefully.


Post Posted: February 28th 2007 4:45 pm
 
I am Jack's bowel cancer

Join: May 2nd 2005 4:19 pm
Posts: 444
Location: NorCal
:lol:

The more I think about it, this is a great way to go. They (the writers and director) can spend more time with character development on both the Joker and Two-Face, and not have to rush things with either character more than they would were both villains present in the movie.


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14  Next



Jump to:  
cron




millenniumfalcon.com©
phpBB©