It is currently May 1st 2025 2:06 pm




 
Post Posted: June 24th 2005 4:29 am
 

Join: August 6th 2004 6:29 am
Posts: 857
I was really looking forward to this and I'm still stunned by how good it was. Hollywood's doing a lot of bitching about box office grosses being down, but this is turning into a great summer for genre movies.

I came home to find that the NY Times review pretty much echoed what I thought (another surprising development), so I'll take the lazy way out and post it here:

Quote:
Not Just Roaming, Zombies Rise Up

By MANOHLA DARGIS
In "George A. Romero's Land of the Dead," an excellent freakout of a movie, the living no longer have the advantage or our full sympathies. The fourth installment in Mr. Romero's vaunted zombie cycle (which began with his 1968 masterpiece, "Night of the Living Dead"), the new film is also the latest chapter in what increasingly seems like an extended riff on Dante's "Inferno."

In the earlier "Dead" films, Mr. Romero guided us through circles of hell that, despite the flesh-eating ghouls, looked a lot like the exurban world outside our windows. With this new movie, we jump straight to the ninth circle, where Satan is a guy in a suit and tie who feasts on the misery of others, much as the dead feast on the living.

It's a sign of both Mr. Romero's waggish humor and control as a director that the guy in the suit and tie is played by the cult-movie icon Dennis Hopper, an often unrestrained performer who here is right on the money. Mr. Hopper plays Mr. Kaufman, the absolute ruler of a haven called Fiddler's Green, a tower of steel and glass at the center of a city with more than a passing resemblance to Manhattan. The tower, which appears to have been modeled on a Vegas hotel, complete with the usual feedlots, luxury stores and glassy-eyed shoppers, rises above the devastated metropolis like a threat and a promise. Outside its locked doors, amid atmospheric squalor, the huddling masses distract themselves with bread and circuses, while one man agitates for revolution. Beyond: zombieland.

Although they've always had a strong political subtext, Mr. Romero's zombie movies, which also include "Dawn of the Dead" (1978) and "Day of the Dead" (1985), have emphasized praxis over philosophy. To that end, the living hero of this film isn't the agitator, but a no-nonsense tough, Riley, played by the fine young Australian actor Simon Baker. Best known for the television show "The Guardian," he has done exceptional work in both "L.A. Confidential" and "Ride With the Devil," and in this film he holds the center with an attractive lack of fuss. His character is one of those burned-out warriors who says he wants to pack it in, only to be coerced back into action. This may partly explain why Mr. Romero, who hasn't made a zombie movie in two decades, shines such a sympathetic light on him.

There aren't a lot of people in "Land of the Dead" whom the director likes as much as he does Riley, or for that matter, his zombie alter ego, Big Daddy (Eugene Clark). We meet Riley and Big Daddy after an attention-seeking credit sequence that recaps the zombie situation to date ("They kill for one reason. They kill for food.") and brings us straight to "Today." Here, in a wasteland called Uniontown, next to a diner sign emblazoned with the word "EATS," Riley and his sidekick, Charlie (Robert Joy), watch as Big Daddy, dressed in a gas-station attendant's uniform, tries to go through the work motions. Riley is struck by the zombie's commitment to its old rituals; but what gets his attention is that this itinerant corpse seems to be communicating with other zombies.

A pioneer in the slow-zombie movement (think of him as the Alice Waters of contemporary horror), Mr. Romero has not joined the recent fad for zippy corpses, as seen in both "28 Days Later" and the remake of "Dawn of the Dead." Mr. Romero's monsters still move at a relatively lethargic pace, dragging their dead weight as if they were made of lead, not putrefying flesh. What has changed since corpses roamed the cemetery in "Night of the Living Dead" crudely pockmarked with sores and dripping movie blood is the special-effects makeup, which in the new film is alternately frightfully real and obscenely beautiful. Here, Mr. Romero, whose striking parking-lot exteriors in "Dawn of the Dead" looked like they were designed by Ed Ruscha, creates gruesome demons right out of Bosch and Goya.

The story more or less takes the shape of an extended chase scene, in which the living and the zombies alternate between their roles as hunters and hunted. Riley, who's anxious to split for Canada (where the film was actually shot), to find a land without borders and zombies, works salvaging supplies from outside the city. Inside an armored vehicle ordained Dead Reckoning, he and his crew, whose numbers include Cholo (an exceptionally good John Leguizamo), search the zombie-infested badlands for food and medical supplies. For Cholo and some of the others, there's much fun to be had popping wheelies on motorcycles while blowing holes through the zombies, even if the ghouls, still dressed in the clothes in which they died - a cheerleader's outfit, a butcher's apron - look uncomfortably human.

Neither fully alive nor dead, zombies exist between the margins, in a twilight state that makes them among the most unsettling of all man-made creatures. That's the essential paradox of all zombie movies, but it's a paradox that has taken on increasing complexity in Mr. Romero's zombie quartet. In "Night of the Living Dead," the zombies were more or less indistinguishable rotting-meat puppets. Like animals, they were also beyond good and evil, eating simply because they were hungry. (And zombies, of course, are always hungry.) This first film centers on a cluster of people holed up in a farmhouse surrounded by the dead. The hero is a black man who tries to save everyone only to end up dead, shot by a posse that, as Mr. Romero makes clear in the devastating finale, is little more than a lynch mob.

With each of Mr. Romero's zombie movies, the walking dead have grown progressively more human while the living have slowly lost touch with their humanity. One thing that has always distinguished Mr. Romero's films, not only from the horror-genre pack but from so many action flicks, is that the director knows killing is killing. The chilling cackling of the posse at the end of "Night of the Living Dead" reverberates through the bombed-out landscapes in "Land of the Dead" from the start, as one zombie after another bites the dust. Mr. Romero can make you jump out of your seat with the best of them, but the greatest shock here may be the transformation of a black zombie into a righteous revolutionary leader (I guess Che really does live, after all).

With "Revenge of the Sith" and "Batman Begins," "Land of the Dead" makes the third studio release of the summer season to present an allegory, either naked or not, of our contemporary political landscape. Whatever else you think about these films, whether you believe them to be sincere or cynical, authentic expressions of defiance or just empty posturing, it is rather remarkable that these so-called popcorn movies have gone where few American films outside the realm of documentary, including most so-called independents, dare to go. One of the enormous pleasures of genre filmmaking is watching great directors push against form and predictability, as Mr. Romero does brilliantly in "Land of the Dead." One thing is for sure: You won't go home hungry.


BTW -- the "passing resemblance to Manhattan" was actually meant to evoke Pittsburgh, in whose suburbs and outlying areas Romero's first three Dead films were shot (Uniontown and Mt. Washington, both mentioned in the film, are two such areas). But as it turns out, the Pennsylvania film board wanted too much money, so this was shot in Ontario.

This was really great, I hope it makes a boatload of cash.


Post Posted: June 24th 2005 4:57 am
 

Join: January 30th 2005 6:31 am
Posts: 103
IMO there's only been a handful of decent zombie flicks. Night of the Living Dead, Return of the Living Dead, Day of the Dead, and Dead Alive.

I'm getting a little sick of zombie movies. It's definitely a genre that's a little overused these days. Plus Resident Evil just completely sucked on levels that I didn't think possible for a movie of any genre. But Paul Anderson directed it, so the movie was doomed from the start.

Land of the Dead is at least helmed by the great Romero, so it sounds like it stands a shot of being a cool flick. Hope his career gets a kick with this one.


Post Posted: June 24th 2005 11:32 am
 
User avatar

Join: January 14th 2005 4:42 pm
Posts: 278
was never really a big zombie movie fan. to be honest i thought they always looked kinda stupid.

that was until my gf and i didn't make it on time for a show. we had one option and it was Dawn of the Dead (2004) so we risked it. what a great movie. we both had a fucking blast and thoroughly enjoyed it.

i guess the moral of the story is don't be a dipshit and try new things.

i'm looking foward to this one too.


Post Posted: June 24th 2005 4:17 pm
 

Join: August 6th 2004 6:29 am
Posts: 857
I don't read anything from AICN.

The violence is what you have been led to expect from the previous three movies, but it's never (and I almost feel weird saying this) gratuitous. It befits a movie featuring cannibal zombies. You never see more than you need to.


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 



Jump to:  




millenniumfalcon.com©
phpBB©