It is currently May 2nd 2025 8:22 am




  Page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 14  Next
Post Posted: December 18th 2007 12:36 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
yes he does, and has already been seen at that comic convention. the description of the scene was he was seen from behind, sitting at a bar getting a drink when the bartender recognized him. he said something like, "Dent? I thought you were dead?!" and Harvey replied, "HALF" and slams his drink down and they could see the back half of his face from behind and it was burnt.

I color corrected these two pics to match the bottom one.

Image
Image
Image


Post Posted: December 18th 2007 8:15 pm
 
User avatar

Join: July 31st 2004 8:45 am
Posts: 428
My room mate saw Alvin and the Chipmunks with his niece and nephew. Of course it was lame, and he mentioned that Dave only yelled "ALVIN!" twice.

In that vain, any one think that we'll only hear the Joker laugh only twice, or worse - once?


Post Posted: December 18th 2007 10:08 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
Very cool.

I think I'm the only person alive that thought the first one was overrated. I never really bought Christian Bale's Bruce Wayne.

I do like the look of the Joker especially love the laugh - very dark. When Ledger speaks though he sounds very 'try hard' (and gay) especially the "Why so serious!?" and the latter exchange with the chick.


Post Posted: December 18th 2007 10:51 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
CoGro wrote:
Very cool.

I think I'm the only person alive that thought the first one was overrated. I never really bought Christian Bale's Bruce Wayne.

I do like the look of the Joker especially love the laugh - very dark. When Ledger speaks though he sounds very 'try hard' (and gay) especially the "Why so serious!?" and the latter exchange with the chick.


yes, yes you are. No film will ever capture completely a comic book hero. There are just too many years of stories, tens of thousands of words describing their character, to faithfully do any of them justice. But Batman Begins was quite a good attempt!


Post Posted: December 18th 2007 11:44 pm
 
User avatar

Title: Mortician
Join: May 26th 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 1923
Location: Progress City
bearvomit wrote:
yes, yes you are.


Well, not exactly. While I agree with most of what bearvomit just posted, I wasn't as amped as everyone else seems to be about the first one. I liked it, sure. It was definately the best Batman movie ever. But I still haven't bought it on DVD. And I buy just about everything I remotely give a shit about on DVD. TDK looks like a bad-ass sequel, though. I like it better than Batman Begins allready.

I thought the first one was mildly over-rated. I didn't buy Bale's Wayne 100% either, however I think that had more to do with what I thought Bruce Wayne was supposed to be like than the actual performance. But that's just me being nit-picky. Now I'm going to have to get Batman Begins on DVD at some after Christmas sale. I just talked myself into it. Fuck.


Post Posted: December 19th 2007 12:13 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
I just liked Keaton's Wayne a lot better.

He seemed haunted, yet much more likeable. I didn't like Bruce Wayne or Batman in Batman Begins, which is really the point if he's supposed to be a super hero. He was a punk.


Post Posted: December 19th 2007 2:22 am
 

Join: July 27th 2004 5:49 pm
Posts: 212
I think what Nolan is nailing perfectly is the evolution of the characters. This is certainly embodied by Gordon, who we'll see promoted over time. I think Wayne will mature into the business savvy guy we all know and like. Plus, we'll get to see Batman evolve into the detective and hero we're familiar with.

These movies aren't out to set up all the characters in one film, as it clearly states in the title of the first Batman BEGINS. I think there was a hope to tell the story over several films, rather than put a one shot out there and hope to make a sequel like most other comic book films do lately.


Post Posted: December 19th 2007 8:18 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 22nd 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1493
Location: Deep Space Nine
I'm a huge fan of Burton's Batman and Batman Returns. Virtually everything that's comprised in those two films I prefer over all the subsequent films. That said, I do think this one looks pretty bitchin'.


Post Posted: December 19th 2007 8:27 am
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
I love Batman Begins, but I'm hoping these two films will compare well to Xmen/X2: Xmen United. The first was a good start, the second was amazing. I just hope the third movie isn't like X3.


Post Posted: December 19th 2007 9:27 am
 
User avatar

Join: January 23rd 2004 3:13 pm
Posts: 592
Location: Finland
Old images, bigger resolution:

[align=center]
Image Image Image Image
[/align]


Post Posted: January 2nd 2008 11:06 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
Here are a couple of articles you may or may not have seen. The first is a decent Wizard interview with Nolan. Basically, he recaps many points which have already been discussed and denies that Harley Quinn makes an appearance. The second item is quick blurb from Mark Hamill to MTV about his positive reaction to the TDK trailer.

Wizard wrote:
CHRISTOPHER NOLAN ON ‘DARK KNIGHT’ By Rickey Purdin

The director explains the terrifying reality of Heath Ledger’ joker and addressed the Harley Quinn rumor

[spoil][align=left]Even with the investigative skills of the Dark Knight Detective, it might be tough to track down Christopher Nolan these days.

The director hasn’t been in a fixed city—or even the same continent—for more than a few weeks at a time since filming began in April 2007 on “The Dark Knight,” the highly anticipated sequel to the $371 million-grossing “Batman Begins.” With that kind of high-dollar return, Warner Bros. pretty much opened the globe to Nolan and star Christian Bale for the follow-up. By filming everywhere from Chicago to London to Hong Kong, Nolan’s broadened the scope of the Bat-verse as he readies for a July 18 opening. And that wider vision includes a hyper-creepy take on Batman’s greatest rogue, the Joker—played by Heath Ledger—and backup baddie Aaron Eckhart as Harvey Dent, the district attorney-turned-scarred killer Two-Face.

Nolan finally stayed put long enough to give away his filming location in England—by the time you read this he’ll have moved again, this time to the editing bay—and chat about the new villains, the appearance of Harley Quinn and why he might not return for a third Bat-movie!

WIZARD: Obviously, fans can’t wait to see the Joker onscreen, but why add Two-Face as a major villain in “Dark Knight”? Are you worried it may take the edge off Joker a bit?

NOLAN: Certainly there’s always a danger in a sequel by introducing more characters. You can wind up with a very large story. But at a certain point, you start to think that that’s partly the purpose of a sequel—to expand the story that you started telling and carry it on. It expands, too, for all of the characters. You’re doing it in all different directions, and so I think you quite naturally end up with quite a larger story. It’s going to be a tricky balance keeping everything in proportion, but the challenge is what it’s all about.

What challenge do you think the Joker poses for Batman as a character?

NOLAN: The Joker, in his own way, is as much an icon as the Dark Knight is and that presents us with just a tremendously exciting opportunity in terms of how we carry on our story and continue to explore the point of view of the character because, as I said, he is as almost as much an icon as Batman himself. It’s a pretty terrifying spectacle, and he’s a really fascinating character.

When casting a “terrifying spectacle” of a character like the Joker, why choose Heath Ledger?

NOLAN: I was looking for someone who was fearless. knew that I needed a fantastic actor, but I also knew that I needed someone who wasn’t going to worry about comparisons to any other actors who had played the role. I met with Heath before we even actually had a script. We talked about ideas for who the character would be in this movie as opposed to his previous appearances in movies, and we both saw it in the same way. He’s just an incredible, incredible actor, and if you see “Brokeback Mountain,” it’s an amazing performance from a young actor. It’s just this sort of youthful energy that he has and the kind of intensity that he brings to this process has been pretty extraordinary to watch.

How early on did you start to think that you wanted Heath for the role?

NOLAN: I think that it was before we even had a finished draft of the script. I had actually met with Heath a couple of times over the years for different projects, but nothing that seemed to work for us. Then this came up, and he heard that I was going to be doing the character in the next movie. He asked about it and we got together.

Initially, the announcement of Heath as the Joker seemed to polarize fans. Were you worried at all about that reaction?

NOLAN: Oh, not particularly. Jack Nicholson did a very definitive portrayal of a type of Joker; a version of the Joker in the [Tim] Burton film that has lasted as an icon. We were always going to come up against that so I didn’t particularly worry about it. Also, Heath is one of those actors who, in his best work, completely transforms himself and that sort of consumes his star quality. He’s creating something that’s entirely original for himself and so he’s never done anything like this before. I can’t say that I was hugely surprised or worried about the reaction because whoever we would’ve cast, it’s going to be tough for people to know how the palette is going to work. Particularly with Heath, who’s dredging something up from a side of himself that you’ve never seen before.

You portray Batman as a feasible character in your films. In that sense, in a practical Batman world, how is the Joker going to operate?

NOLAN: We worked on a particular tone to the way we were capturing Batman, Gordon [and] all the people that appeared in the film. So then it’s about how you view the icon of the Joker. How do you put him into that world? For me, he immediately becomes a more realistic character. He becomes more, I guess, “realistic” is the word I come back to. We want to create a villain who, as colorful and eccentric as he is, it’s still coming from a place of psychological reality. It’s coming from a recognizable, everyday reality. So the notion of the Joker as the most extreme form of anarchist, the most frightening form of anarchic, chaotic presence in Gotham, that’s very much the starting point for the character and very much what the character has become.

Is that where the scarred look of the Joker comes from? It’s more along the lines of the practical aspect of the movie.

NOLAN: Yeah! Things have to fit in tonally with the other elements of our world. I know that there are certain elements from the comics that don’t fit and some that do. The advantage that we had in writing the script for this film is we just have this great body of work from 65 years of all these different talented writers and artists who’ve tried different interpretations and different ways of looking at these characters.

Heath sounds terrifying when he speaks in the trailer; was that what you expected?

NOLAN: It’s nothing like we expected at all, which is just fantastic. It’s very hard to describe and very hard to pin down. He’s just got an incredible range to the voice and the way in which he uses it. It goes from being quite high-pitched and eccentric to having these sort of moments of extraordinary anger and power where you just feel this guy’s anger at things. He’s very charismatic, but really quite frightening.

Do we get to see the origins of that frightening character in the film?

NOLAN: Without giving too much away, the way that I can describe it is that we don’t show the origin of the Joker, we show the rise of the Joker. It’s slightly a different thing. The whole movie is founded quite strongly on the basis [of an idea] at the end of “Batman Begins” when Ra’s Al Ghul talks about escalation. He talks about the increasingly bizarre and criminal reaction to Batman and the extremity of what Bruce Wayne is doing as Batman.

I’ve heard you say you and the writing team went back to the Joker’s first appearances to capture that essence of the character in the new film. What about that version of the Joker did you like?

NOLAN: It’s really a bit of everything. Funnily enough, we didn’t go back to the origins consciously. I’d probably looked at them years before we were working up the story, and what we found was that we had a lot of very similar elements. There is a murderous quality to him. He’s a criminal, but he has this great delight in his murderous nature and there’s the great siege of a massively destructive, anarchic force in the way that guy looks at the world which is quite amazing, I think. He’s very much the absolute. That’s what we’ve presented in the film. He is an absolute.

Word is we see the Joker’s sidekick and girlfriend Harley Quinn make an appearance in the film. Or is that just all a rumor?

NOLAN: It’s all a rumor, yeah. [Laughs]

Now, how has Bruce Wayne and Batman evolved since “Batman Begins,” and what’s changed about Christian Bale’s actual portrayal of the character?

NOLAN: The basic difference obviously is that he’s now a more fully formed character. We tried to get there by the end of “Batman Begins.” Now we just jump into it with Batman as a more fully formed Batman. So the story moves on from Bruce Wayne and the death of his parents and the tragedy that happened to him as a child. This is much more about how he and his actions are influencing the world around him, how Gotham is changing because of Batman and how Batman is responding to that.

Maggie Gyllenhaal replaces Katie Holmes as Rachel Dawes in the sequel. What makes Maggie so perfect for the role?

NOLAN: I’ve always loved Maggie’s work. I’ve always looked for an opportunity to cast her in something, and when Katie dropped out it seemed like a perfect match because we needed a character for our story. I think Maggie brings a lot of very attractive qualities to the character and has a great maturity. You really believe her in this role.

As a teaser, can you tell us who the first and last characters to speak in the film are?

NOLAN: I’m trying to think if I can answer that…to be honest, the first person to speak is an unnamed character and the last person to speak…I don’t think I should say. I’ll be honest. I hope that doesn’t screw you completely.

Fair enough. In terms of existing teasers, though, you guys have been great about doing viral marketing on the Internet. Why haven’t there been more traditional trailers?

NOLAN: I’m never comfortable with people seeing things until they’re really ready. I don’t like showing footage, whether it’s the studio, whether it’s to fans, whether it’s to family members. I don’t really like showing people things until I know they’ve been worked on and finished.

Speaking of “finishing,” is this film the last for you on the Batman franchise? It’s been a big part of your life for the last half decade.

NOLAN: [Laughs] That’s right! It’s really tough for me to ever talk about future projects. Films particularly of this scale are such mammoth propositions. I never thought that I would do a second “Batman” film. Let me put it that way. I had no thought of doing a second one when I was doing the first one, but obviously you never say, “Never.” Every film I’m working on, however, to me is generally the last film I’m ever going to make. That’s my approach to making film. It’s one of the reasons actually that I’m not comfortable putting footage out or early trailers because I’m engaged in making one thing at a time. I’m very single-minded and very focused on the task at hand and I do focus on just this movie. I really don’t have anything in my head about what’s next or doing another one or whatever.

So it’s not just you being evasive? You’re not trying to say nothing?

NOLAN: Yeah. It’s a tricky thing. I’m always terribly evasive when I’m talking about [Heath] and it’s not that really. It’s just actually very difficult to describe really, that this youthful, energetic, anarchic portrayal is quite frightening. It’s complicated. I think it’s getting out there slowly and people are getting the idea of it, which is fun. It’s as exciting for me because I’m watching it play itself out. But until we actually put it all together, sit there and watch it with my editor, I’m incredibly excited about doing that and I think it’s going to have quite an effect.
[/align][/spoil]
MTV wrote:
Mark Hamill ‘Can’t Wait’ To See Heath Ledger As Joker by Shawn Adler

We recently brought you enthusiastic reactions to Heath Ledger’s portrayal of the Joker from Batman legends like Paul Dini, Adam West and Jeph Loeb.

Stand aside, boys: the Clown Prince himself wishes to make a statement.

“For all those fans that dreamed of an adult approach to the material, ‘Batman Begins’ got nearly everything right,” Mark Hamill wrote to MTV News upon first seeing the trailer for Chris Nolan’s “The Dark Knight.” “I have no doubt this one will be just as good or better.”

Hamill, of course, is often credited with helping to craft the most definitive take on the character yet, in Dini’s “Batman: The Animated Series.” As voice of the Joker, Hamill brought to the Gotham knave a delicate mix of psychosis and manic glee, just as ready with a gun as he was with a gag.

Hamill, like Dini, sees very little of that approach in Nolan’s take on the character — but what he does see has him smiling from ear to ear.

“The balls-out debauched psycho approach seems like a great way of reinventing everyone’s favorite scary (and scar-y) clown,” he enthused. “Can’t wait to see it!”


Post Posted: January 3rd 2008 8:26 pm
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
I don't like to hear Nolan talk about stepping away from this franchise. IF/When that happens, Warners will fuck it up with a 3rd movie.


Post Posted: January 3rd 2008 11:42 pm
 
User avatar

Join: September 15th 2006 11:25 pm
Posts: 136
I really don't get that.

It was always my understanding that he planned to do a trilogy from the beginning.

Also, Two Face is setup as sort of a cliffhanger, so I find it hard to believe Nolan would just walk away from that.


Post Posted: January 4th 2008 12:01 am
 
Fat Bastard

Join: September 27th 2005 8:01 pm
Posts: 1550
Location: In hell
Actually in an article I read (can't remember where) Nolan had not planned on doing a second movie at all. He was just going to leave things at Batman Begins but with the fan base of the reboot series he decided to go ahead and make the second film. It would be a bad idea for him to leave the project now because as Starkiller said, if he leaves now then the third movie will be totally fucked.


Post Posted: January 4th 2008 10:31 am
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
Here are reasons why I think so.

1. Too many franchises start with one director and once that director is done, the films go to shit. Examples: Joel Schumacher, Brett Ratner, Richard Lester.
2. The feel of the movies really came from the original director. When Joel Schumacher took over Batman, he wanted to make it his own. And any director that comes after Nolan will most definitely want to change the look and feel of these movies.
3. Bye bye Christian Bale. Bale is in these movies because he believes in Nolans ability as a writer/director. If he leaves I can't see Bale touching another Batman. And if Bale goes, you might as well count out Freeman, Caine and Oldman.
4. Warner Brothers is an idiot studio. Just like all of them. For every Batman Begins and Superman, we get Superman III, Superman IV and Batman and Robin. If Nolan leaves after TDK, the studio will fuck it up, guaranteed.


Post Posted: January 4th 2008 2:53 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
the example I can give you that contradicts your theory is the Harry Potter series. They've had several different directors, but by maintaining the same cast they've kept the series uniform to some extent while adding new styles and perspectives. I'm not saying I WANT Nolan gone, I'm just saying It's possible for it not to become a train wreck. And HP is Warner Brothers too


Post Posted: January 4th 2008 3:39 pm
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
bearvomit wrote:
the example I can give you that contradicts your theory is the Harry Potter series. They've had several different directors, but by maintaining the same cast they've kept the series uniform to some extent while adding new styles and perspectives. I'm not saying I WANT Nolan gone, I'm just saying...It's possible for it not to become a train wreck. And HP is Warner Brothers too..


But there is also a reason that Harry Potter can work with different directors: Source material. It all comes from the same place. J.K. Rowlings (I don't know HP so I don't know if that is her name or not) A director for Harry Potter will stay somewhat close to the material from the books because of the popularity. The Batman franchise will change much more based on director because it will be a new story each movie and because Nolan has been involved in the writing process. Sure, they'll work from the comics, but after 70 years of stories they have some room to create as they wish. The problem for me is this franchise is Christopher Nolan's world. If he isn't involved, I don't see it working as a franchise. I say reboot if Nolan leaves.


Post Posted: January 4th 2008 5:21 pm
 
Bush Pilot
User avatar

Join: March 23rd 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 1483
Obi-Wan Starkiller wrote:
I say reboot if Nolan leaves.

Or let the character rest like what most superhero franchises should be doing. Nice attempt, Studio Execs, but let's retry in about a decade.


Post Posted: January 4th 2008 5:32 pm
 
Fat Bastard

Join: September 27th 2005 8:01 pm
Posts: 1550
Location: In hell
Obi-Wan Starkiller wrote:
Here are reasons why I think so.

1. Too many franchises start with one director and once that director is done, the films go to shit. Examples: Joel Schumacher, Brett Ratner, Richard Lester.
2. The feel of the movies really came from the original director. When Joel Schumacher took over Batman, he wanted to make it his own. And any director that comes after Nolan will most definitely want to change the look and feel of these movies.
3. Bye bye Christian Bale. Bale is in these movies because he believes in Nolans ability as a writer/director. If he leaves I can't see Bale touching another Batman. And if Bale goes, you might as well count out Freeman, Caine and Oldman.
4. Warner Brothers is an idiot studio. Just like all of them. For every Batman Begins and Superman, we get Superman III, Superman IV and Batman and Robin. If Nolan leaves after TDK, the studio will fuck it up, guaranteed.


I agree with those points. The comparison from Harry Potter is okay I guess but those are films I could never get into. I've tried but to me their boring as shit.


Post Posted: January 4th 2008 10:59 pm
 
User avatar

Join: November 14th 2003 6:06 am
Posts: 818
Topeka wrote:
Or let the character rest like what most superhero franchises should be doing. Nice attempt, Studio Execs, but let's retry in about a decade.

I'm starting to agree. :(


WB looks to be fucking up a Superman sequel. WB trying to do a Justice League film is borderline retarded.

20th Century Fox fucked up both Fantastic Four movies and Daredevil. They don't know what to do with X-Men. Ghost Rider was painfully bad.

I liked the Hulk film, but that is probably dead. I can't see Norton changing anything especially against the competition of Iron Man, The Dark Knight and Indy 4.

The Watchmen could go either way and it's a one and done thing anyway.


Hopefully, we'll get three films total from Nolan and Bale and I'm hoping for two Wolverine movies, but that thing has been a fucking debacle so far. After that, a break is probably in order.


Post Posted: January 4th 2008 11:24 pm
 
Fat Bastard

Join: September 27th 2005 8:01 pm
Posts: 1550
Location: In hell
I guess I'm in the minority here. I enjoyed both Fantastic 4 films and love all three X-Men films, all though I will admit X-3 could have been a bit better.

I watched Ghost Rider the other week and I actually enjoyed it. Like I said that's just me and I seem to be in the minority.


Post Posted: January 5th 2008 5:06 am
 
User avatar

Join: November 14th 2003 6:06 am
Posts: 818
I'm definitely a fan of the three X-Men films. I really loved the first two. I can live with the third as well. I'll always wonder what Singer's would've been like though.

I just hope Nolan does three Bat flicks. The third one often seems to be when the wheels come off.


Post Posted: January 5th 2008 10:23 am
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
Darth Hade wrote:
I can live with the third as well. I'll always wonder what Singer's would've been like though.



It would be nice for Marvel to get Singer, Dougherty and Harris to make a 4 part comic book mini series based on their ideas for the 3rd X-Men Movie. I believe that would sell pretty well.


Post Posted: January 5th 2008 2:49 pm
 

Join: July 27th 2004 5:49 pm
Posts: 212
It really seems all comic film are going down the toilet.

Comic films that rock are:

SUPERMAN RETURNS
BATMAN BEGINS
X-MEN & X-MEN UNITED
DAREDEVIL
SPIDER-MAN & SPIDER-MAN 2

Other than that, I think they missed quite a bit on the others.


Post Posted: January 5th 2008 9:46 pm
 
Bush Pilot
User avatar

Join: March 23rd 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 1483
Out of those, Batman Begins is the only one I care to watch more than once. Maybe I'm just picky.


Post Posted: January 6th 2008 7:29 am
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
OH I'll be honest, I own all of those except Daredevil. I'll watch BB and the X-Men movies and SP2 over and over again. The more I watch SR, the more flaws I find with it.


Post Posted: January 6th 2008 9:43 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
BATMAN: Gotham Knight DVD info: http://www.wizarduniverse.com/magazine/wizard/006675886.cfm?page=1
[align=center]
Image
[/align]
Quote:
Holy animated feature films, Batman! Before the Dark Knight returns next summer, a Batman animated DVD created in the form of Japanese art stylings swoops from the rafters to bat-grapple a line between “Batman Begins” and “The Dark Knight.”

“What you’re going to get from [“Batman: Gotham Knight”] is an animated Batman you’ve never seen before,” enthuses Gregory Noveck, DC Comics’ senior VP of Creative Affairs who helped put the project together, “both from a storytelling standpoint and a stylistic animation standpoint.”

Through six short stories—each penned by an acclaimed writer from the world of comics and Hollywood—the film explores facets of Batman often seen in the comics but never really explored in animation and film. And although each chapter can be viewed independently, they all link together thematically. One of three Japanese animation studios—Studio 4ºC, Production I.G and Madhouse—handles each segment, thereby differentiating the film from the “Bruce Timm universe” and opening up a brand-new artistic interpretation for the character.

“The idea is that, just like in the comic books, the DC Universe is full of infinite and varied stories, so we shouldn’t be locked into one animation style,” says Noveck. “You will definitely get different visual versions of Batman. There will be a range of looks—for Bruce [Wayne] and Batman and the different characters.”

The DVD treks the world of the Christopher Nolan-directed films and explores the overall mythology presented while refraining from casting a bat-like shadow on the film’s continuity.

“We tried not to set up too much for ‘The Dark Knight’ because it certainly stands on its own, but this is kind of like an added accent to that whole universe,” informs Noveck. “If you’ve seen ‘Batman Begins’ and you’ve seen ‘The Dark Knight,’ [this] is something that may have happened in between.”

Look for the “Batman: Gotham Knight” to swing into stores sometime before the July 18, 2008, release of “The Dark Knight.”


IMDB has Christian Bale doing the voice work for Batman/Bruce Wayne in this :heavymetal:


Post Posted: January 6th 2008 10:44 pm
 
Bush Pilot
User avatar

Join: March 23rd 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 1483
Batmanime. :what:


Post Posted: January 6th 2008 11:20 pm
 

Join: April 25th 2004 8:34 pm
Posts: 577
I'm about done with hack online writers/journalists using the "Holy insert inane thing batman" spiel with every fucking batman story...that gripe aside...

bearvomit wrote:
IMDB has Christian Bale doing the voice work for Batman/Bruce Wayne in this :heavymetal:


Fucking Sweet! That'll be awesome. Hopefully something as kick arse at the Animatrix was, or at least certain bits were but not the let-down of the movies of course. But cool, that's awesome. No doubt it'll be included in a mega-box-set release when the movie comes out on DVD but I'll buy it like the batman shill I am.


Post Posted: January 8th 2008 3:49 pm
 

Join: July 27th 2004 5:49 pm
Posts: 212
Nice. I like it a lot.


Post Posted: January 8th 2008 10:39 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
Image

toy pic up


Post Posted: January 9th 2008 6:11 pm
 

Join: September 10th 2004 9:15 pm
Posts: 170
I am so excited for this film. The hype from the viral campaigns and the way they are handling the marketing for this movie is awesome. I ran around with some friends in the first scavenger hunt at Comic Con 2007. I have some pics in my Flickr Account


Post Posted: January 10th 2008 1:57 am
 

Join: April 25th 2004 8:34 pm
Posts: 577
bearvomit wrote:
Image

toy pic up


The Batman figures are ALWAYS decidedly average, I wish Hasbro could get their hands on this franchise...the stuff they put out for StarWars is just spectacular, I can only imagine what they'd do for the Batman franchise....

Alas, we're stuck with shitty figures for kids....


Post Posted: January 10th 2008 4:16 am
 

Join: September 10th 2004 9:15 pm
Posts: 170
I wonder how cool a Sideshow statue of the TDK suit would look


Post Posted: January 11th 2008 3:29 am
 

Join: February 17th 2005 9:54 am
Posts: 254
bearvomit wrote:
Image

toy pic up


bah, looks like the Mattel figure with better colors


Post Posted: January 11th 2008 4:02 am
 
User avatar

Join: November 14th 2003 6:06 am
Posts: 818
I'm sure you all heard the rumor of the script getting out. Unfortunately, the whole story seems to be bogus. However, I've noticed that people seem to be chatting about what was in it.

I haven't read it.
I don't have it.
I don't know if there is anything to have anyway.

But since people are chatting about it, I did come across what can best be described as a condensed spoiler report of it. I'm tagging it, but it sounds like b.s. Draw you own conclusions and we'll look back on it come July.

[spoil]
Quote:
[align=center]The Dark Knight[/align]

The movie begins by showing the goings on in Gotham City. Despite the Caped Crusader, it's still a real mess. It seems that copycats are running around pretending to be Batman. They show up at crime scenes, involve themselves in the situation in some way, and often end up getting killed. This is an unforeseen dilemma for Gordon and the real Batman.

But the true Batman is always in action, and he's not alone. Gotham City has a new District Attorney running the show. He is a brash, talented prosecutor named Harvey Dent. On the personal side, Dent has begun dating Rachel Dawes, the childhood friend and confidant of Bruce Wayne (a.k.a. Batman).

Together, Batman and Dent seem poised to face the criminals of Gotham. When Gambol, the new mob boss in the city, decides to pool all the mob money (we're talking billions of dollars) and put it in China, he sends Lau (a crooked accountant) to Hong Kong. It seems he wants to launder the money through investments in the Pacific Rim. The Batman is able to follow Lau, capture him, and bring him back to Gotham. Dent uses the information taken after his capture to round up a lot of criminals including the notorious Sal Maroni. It is a great victory for Dent, for Batman...and for justice.

Unfortunately, the peace does not last. The Joker, a new criminal madman, reveals himself to the people of Gotham City. He demands that Batman must remove his mask and reveal his identity or he'll start killing innocent civilians. He states that he works for the mob. He wants all of their seized funds back. It seems he's been promised half the cash if he gets it back. The Joker kills some people, but decides to set his sights higher and kidnaps both A.D.A. Rachel Dawes and Harvey Dent.

As part of his plan, Joker gets captured by Gotham's Finest. He reveals the location of his prisoners. They are in different places and Batman can’t get to both in time. The Batman has to decide which one to save. He rushes to rescue Rachel, but the Joker has lied. Batman ends up saving Harvey Dent instead while Rachel dies. Dent loses his mind when he discovers that not only has the woman he was falling in love lost her life, but the Joker has escaped. To add insult to injury, the Joker has set fire to both the money and Gotham Police Headquarters. Clearly, the Joker is only interested in mayhem. He was never interested in the money. The mob is now involved with someone they cannot control.

Filled with confidence, the Joker announces that the Mayor has to go or he'll blow up Gotham Hospital. Dent decides to hunt down anyone who was involved in Rachel's kidnapping. He loses all control and starts killing people. He finds Sal Maroni and kills him soon after Maroni (now worried about Joker's craziness) informs Batman where he can find the Joker. During this time, The Clown Prince of Crime does indeed blow up the hospital.

The Joker reaches a point where he feels that it is he who runs Gotham City. He tells the citizens of Gotham that they have to deal with him or leave. Two big ships set out from the metropolis: one filled with dangerous criminals and the other filled with ordinary citizens afraid to live in Gotham City anymore. The Joker stops the ships in the harbor and announces that he'll blow up both the boats at midnight. However, he gives them a choice. Each ship has a controller capable of blowing up the other ship. If one ship’s passengers choose to blow up the other vessel, the remaining ship will not be destroyed. The Joker wants the innocent to kill in order to save their own skin.

Meanwhile, Harvey Dent finds Jim Gordon, who may have become corrupt. Dent feels this is what led to Rachel's kidnapping and subsequent murder. He threatens Gordon with a gun, but Batman arrives in time. He dives at Dent, knocking him through a hole in the floor and apparently to his death. At this point, Batman decides he must go on the run. It seems he wants to take the blame for all those that Dent has killed. He feels that Gotham City needs to have its ex-D.A.'s image untarnished for the people to believe in law and order again. As for the Joker, he is captured and sent back to prison or possibly to Arkham Asylum.

The End.
[/spoil]


Post Posted: January 12th 2008 4:41 am
 
Fat Bastard

Join: September 27th 2005 8:01 pm
Posts: 1550
Location: In hell
I'm gonna call B.S. on that too. Guess we'll find out this summer if it's true or not.


Post Posted: January 13th 2008 3:38 pm
 

Join: July 27th 2004 5:49 pm
Posts: 212
Sounds like BS to me too. The cut and paste of Two-Face's "choice" for which person to have Batman save is a bit too much a retread for Nolan. I think the story will end up being much more original.


Post Posted: January 14th 2008 1:48 pm
 
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
User avatar

Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm
Posts: 4265
New action figga shots from SuperheroHype. The Batman's new suit looking good. Return of the Tumbler with the new addition of the BatPod. Bottom row are The Dark Knight LEGO.

http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=6680
http://www.superherohype.com/news/topnews.php?id=6684


[align=center]ImageImageImageImageImage[/align]

Image

[align=center]ImageImage[/align]


Post Posted: January 16th 2008 10:51 pm
 

Join: July 27th 2004 5:49 pm
Posts: 212
Zoom Blast Batman oh FFS.


Post Posted: January 16th 2008 11:33 pm
 
User avatar

Join: November 14th 2003 6:06 am
Posts: 818
The cowl bothers me. It is too Robocop. The cape should hide the neckline from the back.

I'm not referring to the toy pic, but it did make me think about the new swivel-head thing they got going on now.


Post Posted: January 16th 2008 11:38 pm
 

Join: April 25th 2004 8:34 pm
Posts: 577
I'm not gonna judge the film, based on the shitty figures that look like the same sculpts have been used for the last 100 "Batman" films...


Post Posted: January 17th 2008 4:59 am
 
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
User avatar

Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm
Posts: 4265
Yeah the Zoom Blast Batman and the Batman Ultimate reek of the 1990's Batman figures. The first two black suit Batmans images look alright at least me. Although the suit is beginning to look a little too Power Ranger-ish for my tastes. :what:

Also the Bat Pod appears to be small and out of scale to the real life movie version. :(


Post Posted: January 21st 2008 10:23 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
new pic. hey, it's a slow news period, I'll take what I can get!

Image

it's being sold on ebay as a signed pic


Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 12:40 am
 
Fat Bastard

Join: September 27th 2005 8:01 pm
Posts: 1550
Location: In hell
That's a signed picture? :lol:

I think someone was doing a little too much weed. :mrgreen:

There's no way in hell that's a real signed picture. Looks like just a bunch of squiggly lines to me.


Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 4:37 pm
 

Join: February 29th 2004 6:19 am
Posts: 243
Has all shooting and voice work been finished for the movie?

Cause Heath Ledger has been reported dead.


Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 4:50 pm
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
Wow, just saw that on CNN and thought to myself "Well, I guess the Joker won't be getting past this movie"

RIP Ledger.


Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 5:03 pm
 

Join: October 25th 2005 2:12 pm
Posts: 508
Raveers wrote:
That's a signed picture? :lol:

I think someone was doing a little too much weed. :mrgreen:

There's no way in hell that's a real signed picture. Looks like just a bunch of squiggly lines to me.


Well, I guess you've not seen Lucas' signature. :p


Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 5:09 pm
 

Join: April 28th 2005 2:18 am
Posts: 154
Location: Dallas
Why do these guys not just stick w/ the :weed: ?


Post Posted: January 22nd 2008 5:28 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
.... just shocked. DAMN. now they're saying it looks like a suicide. over the counter sleeping pills were found all over the bed.


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 14  Next



Jump to:  
cron




millenniumfalcon.com©
phpBB©