It is currently May 1st 2025 12:58 pm




  Page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Post Posted: March 29th 2009 4:40 pm
 
Fat Bastard

Join: September 27th 2005 8:01 pm
Posts: 1550
Location: In hell
E_CHU_TA! wrote:
I’m tired of reading other people’s interpretations.


I say that about all movies, hence why I reserve judgment until I see a certain film myself.

All though for the new Star Trek movie PASS. Just from the trailers the film looks like garbage and I'm a Trekkie but this just doesn't suit me.


Post Posted: March 29th 2009 7:33 pm
 
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
User avatar

Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm
Posts: 4265
from the previous page

COBRA COMMANDER REVEALED
bearvomit wrote:
Cobra Commander toy revealed. He's a burn victim in a breathing mask. Sound familiar?


ImageImage


Post Posted: March 30th 2009 2:13 am
 
User avatar

Join: November 14th 2003 6:06 am
Posts: 818
E_CHU_TA! wrote:
It seems that the movie is aligning with the cartoon for Cobra Commander's origin. The first G.I. Joe movie revealed that the Commander was originally an blue-skinned scientist. During an experiment, the Commander face came in contact with a strange spore. This accident caused him to grow additional eyes. In these terms, it seems that the fire explanation is a little more practical.

Image

Ahh, Cobra-La. That's when it started to go off the beam. Still, I loved that Nemesis Enforcer. :heavymetal:


Post Posted: March 30th 2009 3:56 am
 
User avatar

Join: May 2nd 2005 7:26 am
Posts: 1998
Location: Down the rabbit hole
It was a draw between him and pythona for me. Golobulus could jump off a cliff for all I cared. The other two were pretty keen though.


Post Posted: March 30th 2009 5:25 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 19th 2004 1:27 pm
Posts: 1703
i watched that movie the other day! Cobra Commander turning into that damn snake still creeps me out to this day. "Wasss a mannn, WAAASSSSS A MAAANNN!" :o

[flash width=425 height=350]http://www.youtube.com/v/Kkcgj8ac9P0[/flash]


Post Posted: March 30th 2009 8:04 am
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
Raveers wrote:

All though for the new G.I. Joe movie PASS. Just from the trailers the film looks like garbage


Fixed that for ya. No charge.


Post Posted: March 30th 2009 10:47 am
 
Fat Bastard

Join: September 27th 2005 8:01 pm
Posts: 1550
Location: In hell
Sorry Starkiller, but G.I. Joe I'm interested in seeing. The new Star Trek film I'm not. So don't "fix" my posts next time.


Post Posted: March 30th 2009 1:32 pm
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
Oh I'm sorry, I thought you were joking about the GI Joe movie looking good. Looking at the trailer I would have thought it was a joke. Again my bad.

I just watched the trailer again :lol: Are you sure you're not joking?


Post Posted: April 30th 2009 10:31 pm
 
User avatar

Join: November 14th 2003 6:06 am
Posts: 818
GI JOE: THE RISE OF COBRA International Trailer.

[s]http://www.allocine.fr/blogvision/18886097[/s]


Post Posted: May 1st 2009 7:46 am
 
User avatar

Join: October 31st 2003 7:00 am
Posts: 956
It's down but youtube has it. [s]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oaTLVHzfjQ&hl[/s]

I'm still liking what I see of this, moreso than Transformers Blew or Terminator Stagnation.


Post Posted: May 1st 2009 8:58 am
 

Join: November 16th 2008 3:10 pm
Posts: 317
Really? I was a huge fan of all 3 franchises as a kid and this one is scaring me the most. I thought Resolute was awesome... the last episode might have been a bit slow, but Im not sold on this movie yet.


Post Posted: May 1st 2009 12:27 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 31st 2003 7:00 am
Posts: 956
I wasn't a fan of any of these shows as a kid, not GI Joe or Transformers- although I probably watched a few GI Joe 'movies' around the holidays. Granted, how many times and how many ways can the threat of destroying the world be depicted in every fucking movie, but this GI Joe movie has that "cool" factor to me that I'm not seeing in Transformers 2 or Terminator 28.

I mean dumping Megatron in the ocean for fucks sake? Are you serious? Like nothing or no one will be curious? Charging out of a helicopter with your buds and shooting a terminator that's already been killed and crushed by the helicopter you rode in on? Really?

I think what it comes down to for me is:

robots-check
terminators-check

GI Joe-hmm haven't seen that one turned into a movie yet. And it has the appeal of Ray Park as Snake Eyes, sexy-ass Sienna Miller and bringing back Dennis Quaid to the big screen.


Post Posted: May 1st 2009 1:52 pm
 

Join: November 16th 2008 3:10 pm
Posts: 317
Im just worried about the look right now... its a little "nipple Batman" to me. I like the darker edgier look... Megatron with starfish on his face... Dirty "Ill rip your f**king lights down" Bale with desolation in the background. Every thing in these Joe previews are too clean IMO. Ill see it regardless. If they dont make Snake Eyes a BADASS!!!!, I will be miffed.


Post Posted: May 7th 2009 6:38 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
New blurb about the Commander from MTV.
[spoil]
[hr][align=left]
Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s Cobra Commander Voice Is ‘Respectfully Inspired’ By The Cartoon

Actor Joseph Gordon-Levitt shared with MTV News that, while his take Cobra Commander in this summer’s “GI Joe: The Rise of Cobra” may not match the cartoon exactly, it was certainly influenced by it.

“I think that it’s respectfully inspired by the cartoon voice,” Gordon-Levitt explained during an interview promoting his soon-to-be-released Sundance hit “500 Days of Summer.” “But it’s just like how in ‘[X-Men Origins:] Wolverine’ you don’t want to see Hugh Jackman dressed up in a yellow jumpsuit like the Wolverine in the comics.”

Incidentally, “X-Men Origins: Wolverine” is the first of the big summer blockbusters out of the gates, while “G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra” is set to hit at the tail end of the season on August 7th. We’ve seen official pictures of just about the entire cast, but Levitt’s Cobra Commander has so far only appeared on a leaked action figure cardback.

This matches Levitt’s older claims, that his costume is intensely heavy on prosthetics and that he’ll be wearing a mask for much of the film. We may have to wait a little bit longer to hear the voice itself.

Children of the 80’s will remember Cobra Commander’s distinctive screech, as voiced by the late Chris Latta. Gordon-Levitt, who grew up with both the cartoon and the action figures, has been very up front in the past about his enthusiasm for Latta’s work. Even if the live action film doesn’t head in the cartoon’s direction exactly, fans can take comfort in the fact that the late voice actor’s delivery was very much on Gordon-Levitt’s mind throughout the production.
[/align]

[hr][/spoil]
Image

The pic above shows the face of the Cobra Commander toy.


Post Posted: May 7th 2009 7:00 pm
 
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
User avatar

Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm
Posts: 4265
E_CHU_TA! wrote:
Also here is the 2nd trailer in HD.

[flash width=425 height=360]http://mediaservices.myspace.com/services/media/embed.aspx/m=56665658[/flash]

Some of the hate towards this film I don't understand, it's GI Joe not Saving Private Ryan. I mean, we are getting a GI Joe and Transformers movie in the same summer. Also the trailer wisely focused on Baroness. :nerd:


Post Posted: May 8th 2009 8:05 am
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
DP I guess if I was a GI Joe fan in the 80s I would feel differently about it. But everything I see about this movie looks embarrassing. The funniest thing for me is that it's like Trey Parker and Matt Stone made the parody of this movie years ago with Team America. If I want to see guys in Iron Man suits jumping around I'll watch Iron Man. This just looks like more Stephen Sommers crap. Has that guy made anything good? Really? And what is with the nanobot/rust-eeze weapon that Cobra is using? And when did the government start recruiting ninjas for special ops? How is this movie any different than kids movies like Spy Kids?


Post Posted: May 8th 2009 8:11 am
 
User avatar

Join: March 22nd 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1493
Location: Deep Space Nine
I have no desire to see this. The trailer offers nothing but more of the same old thing we've been seeing for years in films now, including obligatory CGI overload bullet time shots. I also was not a fan of G.I. Joe at any point in my life so a live action movie doesn't appeal to me particularly.

Obi-Wan Starkiller wrote:
Has that guy made anything good?

I thought the first Mummy movie was decent for what it was. That's about it.


Post Posted: May 8th 2009 4:35 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
I think this movie looks like a joke, personally. The Team America/Spy Kids references are the most spot on. This film looks like a parody.

As a kid that watched the cartoon and had all the toys, I don't think GI Joe translates to an interesting movie and if it could, it definitely wouldn't involve that much terrible CGI. If anything, I would see it being made more as a stunt movie, but this incarnation looks to be more of the same garbage Sommers puts out. He's a horrible filmmaker.


Post Posted: May 9th 2009 5:56 am
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
I agree that some of the movie’s elements seem highly derivative, the CG is mainly subpar, and that Steven Sommers is an average to not-to-great director. However, due the source material (i.e. the G.I. Joe universe), I’m sill keeping an open mind.

For the most part, I’ve not seen anything in the trailers to convince me that this is in fact an overall bad or great movie. Moreover, the spoilers don’t provide help as the script itself has been both praised and panned. Like any other film, TROC has the potential to go either way depending on the treatment of story and characters.

For me, G.I. Joe was a pretty significant part of my life. The toyline was my favorite as a child and the Marvel series was one of the first comics I collected.

After revisiting the cartoon series and the comics, I am convinced that there is a lot of good material that can translate into to a smart film. For instance, the comic book series itself cleverly and objectively interwove themes about third world strife, the Cold War, Vietnam, and inter-military politics.

In general, I am viewing TROC as an analogous to original Batman film. I don’t completely agree with Burton’s approach, but I liked the movie nonetheless. Hopefully, someone will come on longer at a later time and make a Batman Begins equivalent for the franchise.

Obi-Wan Starkiller wrote:
The funniest thing for me is that it's like Trey Parker and Matt Stone made the parody of this movie years ago with Team America. If I want to see guys in Iron Man suits jumping around I'll watch Iron Man. This just looks like more Stephen Sommers crap. Has that guy made anything good? Really? And what is with the nanobot/rust-eeze weapon that Cobra is using? And when did the government start recruiting ninjas for special ops? How is this movie any different than kids movies like Spy Kids?


• I agree with the Team America: World Police analogy, but I don’t think that similarities are a negative.
Does Spaceballs make the OT, Alien, Planet of the Apes, Transfomers, ect. seem like lesser films?

• I’ve not seen any of the Spy Kid’s movies. So, I’m not sure if the analogy applies or not.
I know TROC was been compared to the series by a number of people.

• In defense of the power suits, they originated back in '05 with the G.I. Joe Sigma 6 series.
So, they’re not an off-the-wall addition.

• I think the nanobots are a pretty clever McGuffin.
I’ve heard about these devices being used for healthcare, but never conceived that they could be weaponized.
Why didn’t I think of that?

• I don’t think it’s too much of an overreach for a military unit to employ a ninja.
After all, aren’t Special Forces the modern day equivalent?

Still, I would have preferred the Marvel comic’s approach wherein Snake Eyes wasn’t a ninja when he first joined the military. TROC chose to go the Sigma 6 route and have Snake Eyes raised as an orphan with Storm Shadow. Oh well.


Post Posted: May 17th 2009 6:05 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
A few new interesting action figures are below.

ImageImageImageImage

Arctic Snake Eyes, Destro, Destro’s Ancestor, The Doctor


Post Posted: May 17th 2009 6:26 pm
 
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
User avatar

Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm
Posts: 4265
The Doctor image seems to confirm the previous reports of the combination of Cobra Commander and Dr Mindbender into one character.


Post Posted: May 18th 2009 4:10 am
 
User avatar

Join: May 2nd 2005 7:26 am
Posts: 1998
Location: Down the rabbit hole
For those collecting, the Resolute battlepack is hitting shelves. It's got the red cobra troopers, and a Black/crimson BATs trooper in it.


Post Posted: May 18th 2009 8:29 pm
 
User avatar

Join: November 14th 2003 6:06 am
Posts: 818
CoGro wrote:
I think this movie looks like a joke, personally. The Team America/Spy Kids references are the most spot on. This film looks like a parody.

I agree. My expectations really went down after that trailer. But I'll still go to see Ray play Snake Eyes.

In terms of quality, I think it is going to be a bad summer for movies.


Post Posted: May 27th 2009 11:39 am
 
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
User avatar

Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm
Posts: 4265
Image

New GI Joe poster featuring Baroness


Post Posted: May 27th 2009 3:53 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
Like the film itself, the poster is not so subtle: www.bestweekever.tv /gi-joe-the-rise-of-sienna-millers-ass/


Image

Why isn't Destro included if he's the main villian?


Post Posted: May 28th 2009 5:51 am
 
User avatar

Join: May 2nd 2005 7:26 am
Posts: 1998
Location: Down the rabbit hole
They're trying to be sly?


Post Posted: May 29th 2009 7:23 pm
 
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
User avatar

Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm
Posts: 4265
Baroness-centric video (after these commerical messages)

[flash width=499 height=306]http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:uma:video:mtv.com:395908[/flash]


Post Posted: May 31st 2009 7:08 am
 
User avatar

Join: May 2nd 2005 7:26 am
Posts: 1998
Location: Down the rabbit hole
She may be the only reason I see this movie.


Post Posted: May 31st 2009 12:07 pm
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
This will be the greatest movie of all time.


Post Posted: May 31st 2009 7:42 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
The full Paris clip is below. (MTV)

[flash width=512 height=319]http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:uma:video:mtv.com:396026[/flash]

It makes sense that the Baroness is key to the film's promotion. The marketers probably feel that the character will attract both men and women to the movie.


Post Posted: June 1st 2009 2:56 pm
 
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
User avatar

Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm
Posts: 4265
E_CHU_TA! wrote:
Also, here is a new trailer for the videogame.

[flash width=560 height=340]http://www.youtube.com/v/fEKRplzqv2w&hl=en&fs=1[/flash]


GI Joe's Halo-esque suitss and bullet-time doesn't bother me. The cartoonish effects such as the green laser do. Miller's Baroness again the main focus of the MTV trailer steals the show. Storm Shadow needs to dressed as ninja not as a hospital employee.


Post Posted: June 3rd 2009 6:42 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
New TV spot with new footage: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3NBLZOr_xg&fmt=22

[spoil]
[align=left]
[hr]
Q: For the majority of comics readers, when they think GI Joe they think Larry Hama. How did the opportunity to write GI Joe first come about?

Hama: I’ve answered this in every single interview. I was the last person they asked. Everybody else had turned it down. I couldn’t get any other writing work, so I took it. If they had asked me to write Barbie, I would have done that, too.

Q: When approaching GI Joe, did you have a concept in mind going in, or did Hasbro have a direction they wanted to take? What was the initial process of creating the back-story and story arcs for this series?

Hama: Hasbro had no idea what story was. That was why they brought in Marvel. Knowing what you can’t do is the best talent to have. Then, you can get somebody who knows how to do it to do it, and you can concentrate on what you do know you can do. I made up the back-story as I went along, mostly as retcon. I never submitted a single story arc beforehand because I never knew how any one given issue was going to end until I got to the last page. When I started drawing/writing “Silent Interlude” (“GI Joe: Real American Hero” #21) I had no idea that both Snake Eyes and Storm Shadow were going to have matching hexagram tattoos.

Q: You wrote the majority of the file cards for the Hasbro toys. What was that process like? Did Hasbro show you figure designs and ask you to create a name and history for the toy? How much input, if any, did they have in the process?

Hama: They supplied me with a concept drawing of the figure and some sort of job description. “Missile Specialist” or something like that. Sometimes I changed that as well. They pretty much let me do my thing. I always based the characterization on real people, mostly people I knew or still know, so I had a reference point for nuances and for consistency. In any given circumstance, I knew how my cousin Randy would react, so the touchstone was always there to keep me from bending the character to the will of the plot.

Q: Many of your characters created for the comics saw their way into the toy lines. Was that a rewarding experience to see your characters expand beyond the page into the toys, cartoons, and later film? How did the rights on those characters work out?

Hama: Hasbro owns everything. But that was the deal from the getgo. That’s fine. It’s called “business.” I had to create new characters for the comics to hold the stories together or to facilitate storytelling. The Baroness came about because there wasn’t a single Cobra character with a visible face! It’s sort of hard to have acting going on when nobody has any agents of expression. It was very cool to see the Oktober Guard and Kwinn finally get their figures. I’m still waiting for Bongo The Balloon Bear, though.

Q: GI Joe” featured soldiers from all areas of combat and expertise from land, sea, air and beyond. Did you have to do extensive research into the different military aspects to try to keep the book somewhat realistic in terms of weapons, combat physics, etc.? Did you have any military consultants you consulted regularly? Any films or documentaries you used for inspiration?

Hama: Marvel at that time was a short walk away from a store called Sky Books that was the military book store in New York. The staff there was knew their stuff backwards and forwards. For the current SOPs I usually called the US Army PIO in New York. My friend, the late Lee Russell helped me a lot. He was a vet who a member of the Company of Military Historians and the Association of American Military Uniform Collectors. He wrote a number of books for Osprey Publishing including the terrific “Uniforms of the Vietnam War 2.”

Until fairly recently, movies got everything wrong. I saw “Jarhead” with an ex-Marine who complained through the whole show. “They should spread out and keep their intervals! Why are they silhouetting themselves on the ridgeline?” “Bravo Two Zero” is amazingly right on and very detailed, down to poop-disposal in the field. It’s about Brit SAS scud-hunters in Iraq during Desert Storm. An older SAS (Aussie) movie that’s pretty good is “Odd Angry Shot.” Book-wise I would recommend everything ever written by Stephen Ambrose and John Keegan.

Q: One would imagine that the characters of GI Joe must be near and dear to you. Do you have a personal favorite Joe? How about a favorite villain? Is there a character you relate to personally?

Hama: Snake-Eyes. Easiest one to write. I like Destro but he’s hard to write. I can’t say I identify with any of them actually. As a kid, I identified with Huey, Dewey and Louie.

Q: The popularity of characters such as Snake Eyes owe a large part to your giving the characters life through story. What do you think makes Snake Eyes such a fan favorite?

Hama: A total bad-ass with a sword and an Uzi -- what’s there not to like?

Q: Did you help at all creatively on the cartoon series? Or the upcoming feature film?

Hama: Had nothing to do with the animated series. Never actually seen an entire episode. I was on board as a consultant on the movie. I’m seeing the latest cut at the end of May, but I really liked the rough cut I saw in December. Stu Beattie wrote a killer screenplay. Marlon Wayans rocks. Ray Park owns Snake-Eyes. ‘Nuff said.

Q: Looking back on the Marvel “GI Joe” series, is there one story in particular you produced that is your absolute favorite?

Hama: I liked the two stories that I drew in entirety that were both inked by Steve Leialoha. Other faves are the Mike Golden yearbook story, Ron Wagner’s space shuttle story, the Russ Heath issue, Mike Vosberg’s Snake-Eyes and Kwinn in the Avro Lancaster story, Mark Bright’s Snake-Eyes parachutes into Borovia and kicks butt story, Trimpe’s original Oktober Guard two-parter and Don Perlin’s Kwinn story (“Real American Hero” #2).

Q: How far ahead did you plot out storylines for “GI Joe” when you were writing the series?

Hama: About two or three pages at the most.

Q: Was there any pressure to have the continuity of the comics series of “GI Joe” match the cartoon continuity? Were there any stories or characters in the cartoon that made you cringe?

Hama: Not really—until the Cobra La movie. Then, they forced me to kill off Cobra Commander to match up to the movie. I was ready to quit at that point. I mean, how stupid was that?

[hr]
[/align]
[/spoil]

ABOVE: The text above is an exert from an interview with Larry Hama about G. I. Joe. If he’s happy about the rough-cut then I’m optimistic about the final print.


Post Posted: June 4th 2009 10:15 am
 
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
User avatar

Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm
Posts: 4265
ImageImage

SDCC 12" Baroness ($29.99) (hasbro.com)

Supposedly done in the likeness of Sienna Miller. Perhaps it will look better with glasses on.


Post Posted: June 4th 2009 4:36 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
Here are a few new hi-res photos which I enjoy, but you may not.

ImageImage

ImageImage

ImageImage


Post Posted: June 4th 2009 5:02 pm
 
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
User avatar

Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm
Posts: 4265
Those are actually pretty :cool: especially Baroness. Hopefully the next batch of video will feature Dennis Quad, Ray Park, Cover Girl, and Scarlett as we really haven't seen a lot of them so far.

Again this is a situation where it's sorta screw up this movie:

1. Prominately feature Snake Park, Storm Shadow, and Baroness.
2. Blow stuff up.
3. Profit.


Also in that Hama interview (which is only hidden for length) it's interesting to read some of the behind-the-scenes dramz regarding the :quote: Cobra-La movie :quote: Hama said the fate of Cobra Commander almost led to his leaving the series. For me, I didn't mind it so much as the inclusion of the Slaughter character.


Post Posted: June 4th 2009 7:37 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
In general dp, we’ve not seen a lot of the movie. The promotion footage mainly revolves around the Paris sequence, which is just one piece of the larger story. Personally, I’d like to know more about Destro. I don’t suspect we’ll get more Covergirl as

[spoil]
[align=left]
... she has a really minor role and gets offed in the first half.
[/align]
[/spoil]

The dispute was not so much about the content of the movie, but the decision to intercede.

As the interview indicated, Hama understood at the start of the project that the comic would used to promote the toyline. As such, there were two main rules. For one, the book had to feature new characters which had been created for the shopping seasons. Second, no major characters could be killed as this could hurt the deceased’s character's action figure sales. Barring these two items, Hama could pretty much do anything he wanted with the storylines.

Therefore, when Hasbro made their demand, it seemed like they were assuming more control over Hama. Moreover, the timing of the request was pretty unfortunate. Hama had recently focused several issues on the Commander. He was spending a significant amount of time making the character more complex and interesting. To Hama, it probably seemed like Hasbro was erasing all his hard work.

In the end, it all worked out for the best. Hasbro’s decision forced Hama to get even more creative and, in turn, he came up with one of his more interesting plot twists. Hama had the Commander murdered by a confidant who then assumed the Commander’s identity. With the help of the opportunistic Baroness, the usurper is able to gain control of Cobra.

A few years after his death, the original Commander made a comeback. He returned to do-in his phony predecessor and retake command. It turns out that the Commander hadn't really been murdered - it had just appeared that way. (Recon heals all wounds I suppose.)


Post Posted: June 11th 2009 10:56 am
 

Join: March 15th 2005 9:39 am
Posts: 934
Location: Nashville, TN
Latino Review they have found a forum poster named Endtimes from Producer Don Murphy's site that includes on what might have happened with GI Joe:

[spoil]
[align=left]After a test screening wherein the film tested the lowest score ever from an audience in the history of Paramount, the executive who pushed for the movie Brad Weston had Stephen Sommers, the super hack director of the film fired. Removed. Locked out of the editing room.

Stuart Baird, a renowned "fixer" editor was brought it to try to see if it could be made releasable. Meanwhile producer Lorenzo whose turkey IMAGINE THAT explodes this weekend as the new bomb in theatres (also championed by Weston) was told his services were no longer needed on the film either.

Sommers was then forced by his William Morris agents to pretend that he was working on Tarzan over at Warner Brothers doing design work, even though that film doesn't even have a good script yet. When word of the firing started to be whispered about in Hollywood, Sommers was summoned back to the editing room- but only to save appearances, Baird is still editing the movie with studio input.

Hasbro CEO Brian Goldner, who turned down other offers from the property to go with the script that was rushed in 8 weeks by Stuart Beattie because of the writer's strike is frantic that this will destroy the brand and is distancing himself from the pending catastophe.

NONE of this needed to happen, except someone who did not know the mythology, Lorenzo was in charge of the film and never contradicted Sommers on anything. Lorenzo, so you know, was Chairman of Warners and had GI JOE under option there (not as a producer) for SEVEN years and he refused to greenlight the film, stating that because he gre up in Italy he had no knowledge of it. If you google enough, at one point you will see he wanted the film to be about an action hero named MANN (Action Man, get it) and he clearly had no clue what the GI Joe world really was.

And the hapless hack Sommers? Where did he come from? The confused Jon Fogelman at William Morris, who signed Hasbro away from CAA, had to find a director in a hurry for his new clients and gave him the only guy who he repped who would do it. A sad end to what COULD have been a great franchise. Acceleration suits indeed.[/align] [/spoil]

LR is saying that their sources confirm the story. Then they go on to talk to Producer Lorenzo di Bonaventura later and, of course, he says the story is bullshit. Take from this what you will.


Post Posted: June 11th 2009 11:29 am
 
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
User avatar

Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm
Posts: 4265
That is the seconrd thread this week on the donmurphy.net forums which was deleted over a Hasbro movie.

The first one was by a poster who saw the Transformers II screening in Japan. From the LR.com link:


Post Posted: June 11th 2009 8:04 pm
 
User avatar

Join: November 14th 2003 6:06 am
Posts: 818
Hollywood actually deserves this. It has really been a summer shitfest so far.

These studios never learn that the three most important things are script, script, and yes, SCRIPT! It doesn't matter how good the actors are if you don't have a decent screenplay. Why is this so hard to understand? I don't get it.

And when you constantly hire people like Sommers, Ratner, McG, and even the Michael Bay's of the world to direct, well, you pretty much get what you deserve. :what:


Post Posted: June 11th 2009 9:06 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 12th 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 2577
Location: Toronto, Canada
This movie has looked terrible from the very beginning. It doesn't even deserve a thread this long.


Post Posted: June 11th 2009 10:11 pm
 
User avatar

Join: March 22nd 2005 11:53 pm
Posts: 1493
Location: Deep Space Nine
Stephen Sommers should have been ejected from Hollywood after Van Helsing.


Post Posted: June 12th 2009 10:08 pm
 
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
User avatar

Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm
Posts: 4265
New Poster

Image

To the left of Baroness T&A that is a Cobra Trooper and the character known as The Doctor (Cobra Commander).


Post Posted: June 15th 2009 6:55 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
[spoil][align=left]Test Screening Review: G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra

Last week a post appeared on producer Don Murphy’s message board claiming that director Stephen Sommers had been fired from G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra. Producer Lorenzo di Bonaventura later provided damage control, calling the accusation “ridiculous,” refuting claims that the movie is a disaster by saying that “The movie tested very well…” I had also heard from a couple friends that Sommers had been thrown out of the editing room, but was unable to find anyone who would go on record. And bottom line is that Sommers supposedly has final cut. But is the movie the disaster that the anonymous message board posting eluded to? Or is it something more?

Back in March I received an anonymous email from someone calling himself “Dr. Drew” (we’ll assume this isn’t the same Dr. Drew who is on Love Line or Celebrity Rehab). Drew told me that he had just seen a test screening of G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra, and would like to submit a reader review. I told the Doctor that I was interested and made a comment on Twitter about having one of the first GI Joe reviews. A rep from Paramount contacted me and was quick to verify that a test screening had taken place the night before, in the same location my tipper claimed to screen the movie.

But before I had a review in hand, Dr. Drew stopped responding. I sent him a bunch of e-mails, but he vanished into the darkness. I joked with other journalist friends that Paramount somehow killed the story. When the Sommer news hit last week, I thought I’d reach out to Dr. Drew once again. I was curious… is the film really THAT bad? Or is Lorenzo telling the truth? Did the film actually test really well?

The Doctor got back to me and explained that he had never gotten my previous emails (intercepted by Paramount? probably not… Lost in the Internet? more likely). What did Dr. Drew think of the movie? Full details after the jump.

First I want to warn you that this is one man’s (not even a movie critic) thoughts on an early unfinished print of the film. Visual effects were not complete, sound not finished, and the final film could be entirely different. Some films have tested horribly, only to be reedited/finished, and released to acclaim. My point is, a lot could be changed from the time this screened in the time this screened in March up until the August theatrical release. Now that I’ve given you the context, here is the reader review:

“As far as Sommers’ being shit-canned, I wouldn’t be surprised after seeing the rough cut; it’s not exactly on par with the Paramount/summer blockbuster standard established with Iron Man, Transformers, and Star Trek. Quite frankly, I’d be embarrassed to have Transformers 2 be released, G.I. Joe two weeks later, and both with the Paramount Mountain opening up the credits. I hope you find something interesting to pull out of this, I don’t exactly write reviews and tried not to spoil too much…

As far as summer blockbusters go, you could say I’m a aficionado of the kind. Although I’m well-read in the history of film and seek out indies, oscar fare, and of the such, blockbusters are where my heart’s at. I loved Star Trek; I saw it 3 times, I think it’s magical, I think it has that special something that blockbusters rarely hit (although I do think Iron Man and Transformers found it last summer). I thought Wolverine lacked a well thought out narrative and it might have been fun but I couldn’t get past the mess of character organization and lack of direction from one action to another. But I’d watch it again. And Terminator Salvation I didn’t find nearly half as bad as everyone else; I can acknowledge the criticism it received but I really enjoyed it, nothing I can really rave about but it entertained me enough that I wasn’t able to pay attention to the flaws.

The thing with G.I. Joe is that it tries to have the same spirit and flavor as Transformers–it’s really evident… but an ultimate failure. And people can talk shit about Michael Bay until the cows come home but when you watch something like G.I. Joe it does go to show the talent, craft, and attention to quality Bay can bring to an otherwise silly idea.

The movie has extremely cartoonish and, at times, theatrically silly aspects; for example, over-the-top characters, endless one liners, and visually farfetched technology and set pieces. However, it tries fiercely to ground itself in reality and in society’s current global climate. It’s with that grounding that the movie actually redeems itself quite a bit–but not too much. The G.I. Joes–as an organization–veer off from the hyper Americana reputation that it’s known for; G.I. Joe is a top secret branch of NATO that recruits members from all over the world. Within that aspect, a handful of somewhat interesting ideas are produced that could interpret somewhat interesting commentaries of our world as a global community… The only thing I got out of it was a debate with the person I went to the screening with about the state of government and the world; but not exactly tied with the movie. Really though, it’s not worth the brain stretch as essentially the movie’s purpose is to sell toys (and I’m guessing it will as many characters have different costumes throughout the film, along with various vehicles).

As far as the story goes, there’s not much to be told. G.I. Joe clings to dear live on a MacGuffin of a suitcase containing warheads filled with self-replicating, destructive nano-bots, which continuously shifts ownership between the G.I. Joes and the soon to be Cobra Command. And that’s the story, “who’s got the nano-bot warheads?” And that starts immediately as the film begins, right after a 1700’s(?) era backstory explaining James McCullen Destro XXIV / Destro; we’ve all seen this before (Wolverine) and it does little but two things–jack and shit.

Anyways, even though the CG was incomplete in my screening, the action is pretty great. The chase scene with Tatum and Wayans in the Iron Man suits is particularly well done. But rest assured as I’ve noticed a fear online that those suits play a big role; they don’t, they’re used in that scene and that scene only. Basically the biggest drain on this picture is the acting; even Dennis Quaid is cringe-worthy. But the worst has to be Sienna Miller—do not be surprised if anyone (or everyone) in the cast get’s Razzie noms. But with Miller’s character, she wears sunglasses half the movie, delivers normal lines as if they’re one liners, and just cheeses everything up. Snake Eyes may be the best part of the movie (not because he doesn’t have any lines, that’s only a coincidence) as whenever he’s onscreen, he’s doing something interesting.

Really, I don’t know how half the shit (lines delivered) made it to the editing room. Cobra Commander (or “The Doctor” as he’s known the entire movie) may be the most laughable part of the movie. I love Joseph Gordon-Levitt but I’ll be god damned if this character isn’t the most ridiculous thing to come out since Lord Zedd of Power Rangers fame and (spoiler follows, highlight the invis-o-text to reveal) doesn’t actually become Cobra Commander (with the full-head mask) until the last five minutes.

All in all, it’ll be interesting to see how this movie reacts with audiences because it is a high quality production but the talent involved doesn’t match up, and the “toys” aren’t exactly believable.

There were laughs (some at jokes, some at sight gags, and of course at the expense of Snake Eye’s silence), a few cringes from older audience members (like I said before, the one-liners don’t stop), and a general engagement (but not really any type of energy or excited in the air). When the picture ended, there wasn’t really any chatter about the movie. We were given surveys questioning the film in great detail but most people just flew through them and left. It was a so-so experience from the audience perspective. There wasn’t much excitement from the audience afterward.”

It doesn’t sound like the epic disaster that was painted in that post on the Don Murphy message board, but it also doesn’t sound good…[/align][/spoil]

ABOVE: Early test screen review from Slashfilm.


Post Posted: June 17th 2009 12:30 pm
 
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
User avatar

Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm
Posts: 4265
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPErY-0YNeA&fmt=22
(higher quality, embedding disabled by request)


[flash width=560 height=340]http://www.youtube.com/v/Ezkq3M4aTPU[/flash]

(lower quality)


Post Posted: June 17th 2009 3:58 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
New posters to go with the extended trailer:

ImageImageImageImageImage

Despite all the flack, I'm still up for this movie.


Post Posted: June 18th 2009 1:46 pm
 
User avatar

Join: October 31st 2003 7:00 am
Posts: 956
Fuck, that Snake Eyes poster burns.

BELOW: Trailer II

[spoil]
[flash width=560 height=340]http://www.youtube.com/v/d2KyfY-Bmyw&hl[/flash][/spoil]

[spoil]
[flash width=560 height=340]http://www.youtube.com/v/FOyYoK4W7Q4[/flash]
[/spoil]


ABOVE: Japanese Trailer


Post Posted: June 20th 2009 5:26 am
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
A new pic and a newish pic from the NY Times.


Image

Image

I'm starting to like the Storm Shadow trench.
UPDATE: The run time is currently around 107 minutes. That seems pretty brisk.


Post Posted: June 25th 2009 6:19 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
BELOW: Here are the first few pages of issue #1 of the comic adaption. It's on stands 07/01/09. The entire movie will be revealed via the comic over the next few weeks.

ImageImageImageImageImageImage

ABOVE: Here are the first five pages of issue #2 of the comic adaption.
UPDATE: Two new posters. One features Scarlett (:monocle:) and the other consists of classic and modern-era card images.


Post Posted: July 1st 2009 5:56 pm
 
darthpsychotic@gmail.com
User avatar

Join: July 3rd 1971 6:59 pm
Posts: 4265
ImageImageImageImageImage

HI-RES versions of some previously posted images.


Post Posted: July 6th 2009 9:06 pm
 
User avatar

Join: August 4th 2004 8:00 pm
Posts: 1235
Based on spoilers, it appears that the movie follows the sequence below. I could have a few things out of order.

[spoil]
[align=left]I. Prologue: Destro and the Nanomites are introduced.

II. Convoy Intercept: Duke and Ripcord’s convey is destroyed by Cobra. G.I. Joe intercepts and obtains the Nonomites.

III. The Pit: G.I. Joe and company fly back to the headquarters. Duke and Ripcord are introduced to the team and receive training. Cobra unexpectedly invades and steals the Nanomites. Covergirl is killed by Storm Shadow and Hawk is crippled.

IV. Paris: The Joe team intercepts Cobra, but not before the Eiffel Tower is destroyed and Duke is captured.

V. Antarctica: The Joe team launches an all out assault on the M.A.R.S base as missiles are being launched. During the attack, Destro’s mask becomes permanently affixed to his face and Doctor Lewis is irreparably scarred. Storm Shadow vanishes into the ocean after a battle with Snake Eyes.

VI. Epilogue: Duke and Ripcord officially join the team. The Baroness is jailed; Zartan is President; and Rex anoints himself Commander.


Overall, the story is pretty symmetrical. Everything wraps up in just over an hour and a half, which coincidentally, is about the individual length of the first two cartoon miniseries.[/align]
[/spoil]
Image
Image

A new toy version of Cobra Commander is below. Today, I got a good look at the figure in package. Under the mask, it appears that his face is a combination of Freddy Krueger and Two-face.


Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next



Jump to:  




millenniumfalcon.com©
phpBB©